Bye-Bye Big Mixer

Tips and advice for getting the most from Scope. No questions here please.

Moderators: valis, garyb

h4nc0
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Seoul, Korea

Post by h4nc0 »

yes, and with logic live input monitoring, you can use DX/VST/Logic (aka native) plugins on those live inputs! It's quite amazing.
User avatar
paulrmartin
Posts: 2445
Joined: Sun May 20, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by paulrmartin »

This is from the the first post in this thread:

"You might want to setup a def.pro and def.all so you only have to do this whole setup once. "
I know what a ".pro" is, but I'm at a loss as to what a ".all" might be.

Someone light my lantern please.
Paul

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: paulrmartin on 2001-10-03 05:19 ]</font>
Ora
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by Ora »

the .all extension is Cubase's native format - logic's is .lso (i believe) so just replace the .all in the text w/ .lso & your good to go!

Merry Music Making!
User avatar
paulrmartin
Posts: 2445
Joined: Sun May 20, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by paulrmartin »

Thanks for the info Ora! :wink:
krip
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by krip »

How does one enable "multirecord" in the first place??
algorhythm
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Post by algorhythm »

In Cubase: options>multirecord>active>merge
or something like that.
User avatar
braincell
Posts: 5943
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Washington DC

Post by braincell »

I find that turning on ASIO inputs in Cubase uses a lot of CPU power. Pulsar on the other hand doesn't put any strain on the CPU.
algorhythm
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Post by algorhythm »

On 2001-10-22 12:48, braincell wrote:
I find that turning on ASIO inputs in Cubase uses a lot of CPU power. Pulsar on the other hand doesn't put any strain on the CPU.
yep. but mixing on pulsar puts strain on the dsps. trade off either way (unless you got scope or something).
User avatar
braincell
Posts: 5943
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Washington DC

Post by braincell »

true, I'm lucky enough to have 11 DSPs. I have 4 milliseconds delay in Pulsar 3.0 but 25 in Cubase.
algorhythm
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Post by algorhythm »

you should be able to pull off lower latency than that! I run at 7ms most of the time, and 13 if I push the system more. And 4ms in Pulsar? isn't it realtime? I thought it was sub 3ms or something . . .
freddan
Posts: 115
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Post by freddan »

Don't you have to have the same latency in both Pulsar and Cubase?

On 2001-10-25 08:36, braincell wrote:
true, I'm lucky enough to have 11 DSPs. I have 4 milliseconds delay in Pulsar 3.0 but 25 in Cubase.
[/quote]
algorhythm
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Post by algorhythm »

freddan wrote:
Don't you have to have the same latency in both Pulsar and Cubase?
No. Pulsar devices run around 1-2ms latency; roughly equivalent to hardware synths/samplers. VSTi latency is dependent upon your ULLI setting; ie. 25, 13, 7 ms
ohmelas
Posts: 202
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI USA
Contact:

Post by ohmelas »

I HAD TO DUMP SONAR FOR JUST THIS PURPOSE. I WENT TO CUBASE JUST SO THAT I COULD SWITCH OVER TO XTC AND GET REAL DSP USAGE OUT OF MY SYSTEM. LATENCY IN MIX ISN'T BAD. ITS ONLY A REAL BOTHER WHEN TRACKING.

I USE DIGITAL MIXERS ON THE FRONT END AND AJUST ACCORDINGLY. THEY AUTOMATE COMPELTELY THE CUBASE ENVIRONMENT.

I DON'T HAVE SAMPLE ACCURATE SYNC EVERYTHING BUT CAN KEEP EVERYTHING PRETTY PHASE ACCURATE.

FUNNY THING ABOUT DIGITAL IS THAT THE PHASE THAT EXISTS IN SOLID STATE IS NOW MEASUREABLE WITH DIGITAL AND WE MAKE MORE OF A STINK ABOUT IT!

REGARDS ALL NICE DISCUSSION.

HOWARD
algorhythm
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Post by algorhythm »

we hear you fine.

you do not need to yell! :grin:
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

On 2001-10-04 05:47, algorhythm wrote:
In Cubase: options>multirecord>active>merge
or something like that.
Multi track recording in Cubase: do not take 'merge' for that but use 'Input Split'.
Assign different input on Cubase channels, record enable the tracks.
During recording, I disable ASIO2 monitoring too.
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

...
I only use the BixMixer of the Pulsar. Right now I'm recording the movements I make with the BixMixer in Cakewalk. Works fine with me.

Anyone outthere who can convince me in using Cubase/VST with their mixing environment instead?
...
CWPA is my favorite for midi. I liked the CAL files a lot, these are simple user-programs like the 'Logical Edit' in Cubase. Also remote control seemed more convenient in CWPA.

If I didn't use so many VST fx (which are way faster than Dx and consume less cpu) and Rewire, I'd stick to CWPA. Btw, what audio drivers do you use in Cakewalk?

a t :cool: m i c
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
algorhythm
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Post by algorhythm »

On 2001-11-06 20:17, atomic wrote:
On 2001-10-04 05:47, algorhythm wrote:
In Cubase: options>multirecord>active>merge
or something like that.
Multi track recording in Cubase: do not take 'merge' for that but use 'Input Split'.
Assign different input on Cubase channels, record enable the tracks.
During recording, I disable ASIO2 monitoring too.
actually, I think we are both wrong! I was talking about MIDI. what one really needs to do is activate the ASIO channels on the "VST Inputs" page. . .
algorhythm
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Post by algorhythm »

Cakewalk Sucks! :razz: no Sequencer war here though. Me likes VST FX too. Preach on At :grin:mic

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: algorhythm on 2001-11-06 21:24 ]</font>
kenny
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: ttgroove productions
Contact:

Post by kenny »

On 2001-08-26 06:15, h4nc0 wrote:
yes, and with logic live input monitoring, you can use DX/VST/Logic (aka native) plugins on those live inputs! It's quite amazing.
I'm trying to set up my sts-5000 with logic's mixer. Mabe I'm stoopid but I can't get the DX/VST/Logic plugins to work.

This is what i do:
1.First i set up all my sts outputs in the EASI inputs + EASI output to sound out.
2.Second I set all the audio to "armed" (REC) and Rec the midi channels I've choosen.

I get sound out and everything, but when I start setting up an effect with DX/VST/Logic plugins, <b>I get no effect out of it.</b>
I tried to set the effects on the main output and this works! I can't understand what's wrong.... Has anybody got a clu??
djevo
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2002 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by djevo »

first an ultimate neewbie question: what is automation?

Algorythm >>: would you also 'advice' to don't use the Pulsar mixer that comes with the ProPack?

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: djevo on 2002-05-25 03:14 ]</font>
Post Reply