Fm One not working correctly in v3 or i have destroy the fil

fra77x · Post by **fra77x** » Mon Oct 01, 2001 5:40 am

is there an update version?
u can't see the algorythms and u can make it play polyphonicaly!! ???? and half patches give an exeption error

samplaire · Post by **samplaire** » Mon Oct 01, 2001 6:11 am

looks like... I think they just discontinued fm one (not too impressive sound or so) - but you have new synts in 3.0 which sounds better (or at least different than fm one) and are not so dsp hungry

fra77x · Post by **fra77x** » Mon Oct 01, 2001 6:17 am

Can u point me at an 8 operator fm synth in the new synths? Poor sound??? There isn't other pulsar synth to make different fm algorythms.... (in modular u can't u must save another device for another algorythm)Dx7 had 6 operators... i want fm one.. Poly fm as i know is a part of the scope product

samplaire · Post by **samplaire** » Mon Oct 01, 2001 6:25 am

I only wrote what i think they did. this is not my opinion on fm one. I'm also dissappointed with the fact of fm one lack...

Eurocide · Post by **Eurocide** » Mon Oct 01, 2001 10:19 pm

My FM one is also damaged this way.
But it was already blown in 2.04a
I built a modular synth similar to the DX21.
It is polyphonic and more flexible than FM one.

(BTW: FM rules for EBM

)

PabloFasan · Post by **PabloFasan** » Fri Oct 05, 2001 7:06 pm

It's wonderful to see that there are others that apreciate FM synthesis.

In the opinion of CW's team, for years I was the only user claiming for the polyphonic version of FMOne for Pulsar.

It just exist and is part of Scope's software bundle and only require to have a Pulsar key for to be used.

The FMOne is a perfect clone of a Yamaha DX7 but with 8 operators, is probably the most complex and interesting synth that CW's has ever created (or cloned).

To program FM is not easy and also is not intuitive, but the sounds palette that's possible to get is wider and more interesting than all the substractive synths clones that are everywhere.

To build an FMOne with the Modular II is theoretically possible, but in facts is a so complex work that probably nobody will do it never.

Also it will consume an amount of DSP power that probably could allow only no more than two voices in a Pulsar II.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: PabloFasan on 2001-10-05 20:09 ]</font>