at0m wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2019 12:00 amIn your current setup, Scope OS still gets to choose on which board it loads the mixer, and I suspect that's currently on one of the Scope cards on onboard PCI. At the bottom of Dynamic Mixer, between the name of the mixer and the midi channel, there's a drag-and-select option to force the mixer (and hence, the MV's) onto a DSP card on the PCI extender. In your case, drag the board option to board2.snoopy4ever wrote: Fri Jun 28, 2019 12:43 pmhello at0m.,at0m wrote: Fri Jun 28, 2019 12:03 pm [...] load them in a mixer (dynamixer would do) that's forced to your Pulsar2 [...]
just did what you asked me ... and I think is crazy enough.. Please let me know if this is correct :
I loadded a dynamicMixer and set 10 stereo channels and inserted 20 MV's on the insert slots.... so far no pci problem .. I'm attaching an image, pls letme know if you see something wrong.
The important part here:
I'm trying to devise a way to measure the actual PCI throughput for the extender. Once that is confirmed, such extender would be an option for those motherboards that do not even have any classical PCI slots!
And maybe someone else could give exclusion on this: how can we be sure the MV's send traffic over the extender PCI bus and not the STDM cables to a card that is on onboard PCI?
I think the method I suggest above would be enough, but for a conclusive test, the 2 Scope cards on the extender card and no DSP card on the onboard PCI. I understand physically moving around cards is a tough and annoying job and forcing the mixer on the DSP card on the extender is an easier solution. Or maybe I should just order such an extender card and find out myself. I'm that curious![]()
Hello at0m!!!
again ..another test done. Same old empty project with Dinamyc Mixer , this time I selected the board , on this case as you can see on the image Attached I selected the board 1 , wich is the Pulsar 2 , is the only card with 6 processors , on the Async you can se what dsp's are being used , and the total dsp usage .
Garyb already stated the MV-only test is enough to determine if the extender causes problems ( thanks garyb! )... but Let me know your thougths about this.
I think this proves the extender is a real good / working option , for users who need to expand their pic slots.