Go back to where i said yes and no I think you missed the point ,guppy wrote:Ok, I put one masterverb and it seems ok by now, with 44 and 48khz.
I'm so disappointed that I can't use sc verbs !!!!!
because I edited it .
Bear
Go back to where i said yes and no I think you missed the point ,guppy wrote:Ok, I put one masterverb and it seems ok by now, with 44 and 48khz.
I'm so disappointed that I can't use sc verbs !!!!!
Go back to where i said yes and no I think you missed the point ,guppy wrote:Ok, I put one masterverb and it seems ok by now, with 44 and 48khz.
I'm so disappointed that I can't use sc verbs !!!!!
Go back to where i said yes and no I think you missed the point ,guppy wrote:Ok, I put one masterverb and it seems ok by now, with 44 and 48khz.
I'm so disappointed that I can't use sc verbs !!!!!
Go back to where i said yes and no I think you missed the point ,guppy wrote:Ok, I put one masterverb and it seems ok by now, with 44 and 48khz.
I'm so disappointed that I can't use sc verbs !!!!!
Go back to where i said yes and no I think you missed the point ,guppy wrote:Ok, I put one masterverb and it seems ok by now, with 44 and 48khz.
I'm so disappointed that I can't use sc verbs !!!!!
Go back to where i said yes and no I think you missed the point ,guppy wrote:Ok, I put one masterverb and it seems ok by now, with 44 and 48khz.
I'm so disappointed that I can't use sc verbs !!!!!
Go back to where i said yes and no I think you missed the point ,guppy wrote:Ok, I put one masterverb and it seems ok by now, with 44 and 48khz.
I'm so disappointed that I can't use sc verbs !!!!!
Go back to where i said yes and no I think you missed the point ,guppy wrote:Ok, I put one masterverb and it seems ok by now, with 44 and 48khz.
I'm so disappointed that I can't use sc verbs !!!!!
Go back to where i said yes and no I think you missed the point ,guppy wrote:Ok, I put one masterverb and it seems ok by now, with 44 and 48khz.
I'm so disappointed that I can't use sc verbs !!!!!
Go back to where i said yes and no I think you missed the point ,guppy wrote:Ok, I put one masterverb and it seems ok by now, with 44 and 48khz.
I'm so disappointed that I can't use sc verbs !!!!!
Go back to where i said yes and no I think you missed the point ,guppy wrote:Ok, I put one masterverb and it seems ok by now, with 44 and 48khz.
I'm so disappointed that I can't use sc verbs !!!!!
Go back to where i said yes and no I think you missed the point ,guppy wrote:Ok, I put one masterverb and it seems ok by now, with 44 and 48khz.
I'm so disappointed that I can't use sc verbs !!!!!
Welcome here also If there is more to do.guppy wrote:I think everything is ok as it was not a real problem but a limitation that I didn't understood well.
Now I can say I hope I have an efficient system
Wait just one second here.garyb wrote:sure, but the mixer's in the wrong location. you should monitor before going to the asio dest. the mixers have direct outs, so you can record exactly what you hear. also, any output(such as an ADAToutput) can feed multiple inputs although an input can only come from one output. also, the stm2448 has a lot more useful connections, since it's a real recording console.
on a real console in a real studio the control room outs are what the engineer and producer listen to. the studio outs are for the big playback monitors in the other room where the musicians are and the mix out goes to the 2 track machine....
Well Scope is depending on computer processing in terms of sample rate. In that Scope and Host need to be running at the same sample rate. So therefore the higher you push Scope, the more work Host has to do to keep up.niceboy wrote:Scope is not depending on computer processor.
Bear