OK, first of all i would like to make one thing clear: I have NEVER defended these guys/woman (if you think so, please enlighten/quote me). Its probably just that i interpet the issue from another angle. but i like c ontext; i could rip a five-liner from orwell anytime, and if the reader hadn't read the book i could make it soun pretty scary as a "plan".
I have never put muchattention to the "bildenberg connection" i admit (the crown prince of norway married a single mother crfack whore). But i find your way of argument to be a rather self-destructive, mystification and enpowering way of argument. I mean, there IS a long way from the unhealthy commersialisation we have at this moment (halliburton/iraq etc), but to mysstify this into some holy grail secret hocuspocuss stuff ending in a matrix-like power pack is just dumbening down the debate.
Commercial powers have too much power. most of us know that. rich people stick together, as people in need do. its only more vulgar.
So i say fuck all the sensasionalist jibberish, say it for what it actually is, without putting too much revenue-generating marketing for moneymilking cunts in it, elect a proper president (and if that is "not possible", it should be more of an issue than americans not being able to have a colt in their linning).
people will allways strive for power and territory. just ask Cartman.
We all know, the rulers thought is the ruling thought.
