Page 1 of 1

Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2002 12:16 am
by DarkDog
HI!

I have a problem with the MasterVerb fx. When I'm load the 5ºth MasterVerb appears a dialog box of "Dsp capability limit reached". But if I use MasterVerb Classic I can load until 10.

I have a Pulsar I Plus + Elektra, Windows Me.

This problem may be because a error on the Masterverb?

Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2002 1:54 am
by garyb
sounds about right................

Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2002 2:07 am
by at0m
What does your DSP load indicate on 4MV's?

Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2002 3:20 am
by borg
i think i read somewhere in the pulsar manual, that MV's eat more DSP than MVC's. or am i wrong?

Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2002 9:24 am
by King of Snake
Well, as the MVC has a fixed early reflections algorythm it's bound to be less DSP hungry than MV (for which you can choose between different algorythms). They didn't make a "classic" for nothing you know.
So indeed your performance sounds about right Darkdog. Ask yourself if you really need those 5 MV's or could you do the same with a few MVC?

_________________


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: King of Snake on 2002-04-19 10:25 ]</font>

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2002 2:18 am
by DarkDog
Hi
The real problem is that when I load the 5ºth MasterVerb fx (with the middle of the Dsp load), appears the error: "Dsp limit reached".
I have done this probe for to know the real performance of my mobo: ECS Elitegroup K7S5A
(with Sis735 chipset).

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2002 5:41 am
by DarkDog
Anyone can tell me the diference between MV's and MVC?. I wan't to know if this error loading the MasterVerb is because of the low bandwith of the PCI slots, or due to some bad programing.

Greetings :smile:

Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2002 9:00 am
by mr swim
As I understand it, it is not that the MasterVerb (the more recent of the two) is badly programmed, but rather that it is far more sophisticated than the classic (MVC). So you would expect the MV to take up more room. With 6 chips, and with the basic sampler/mixer and probably a few other things besides, I seem to remember being able to load up about 5 MV's (not at my music machine for these few weeks boo hoo)

So I wouldn't get too worried, unless you are using many chips and are still getting this problem.

Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2002 9:03 am
by mr swim
By the way, the 'dsp capacity reached' message is a pretty regular occurance (at least for us Luna users), and nothing that in itself should lead you to thiink there is a problem.

Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2002 3:27 pm
by wayne

Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2002 7:03 pm
by at0m
Here's what your manual Pulsar Effects says, p.3:

"The MasterVerb produces a range of
authentic early reflection models, while
the Classic version provides only a single
simulation of early reflections. With
regard to DSP usage, the Classic version
is more economical than the MasterVerb.
The Masterverb’s DSP cost is justified by
a more realistic impression of space,
however. The reverb section is identical
in both versions. Choose the version to
use with respect to the production
requirements. For an accurate sense of
spaciousness, use the MasterVerb. To
save DSP resources, or to produce only
the atmospheric component, use the
Classic version."


It wasn't that hard :wink:

Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2002 9:57 pm
by kimgr
Spoken like a true GURU !!!

Kim.