
Mark
I suppose that's what I've done. I ran with VST32/5.1 for 8 years, skipped all the SX versions and upgraded to 4.5 last year (too soon for the grace period offer of course!). I got 4.5 at a brilliant price too.valis wrote:You know, for people who need stability & reliability it might be best with many software releases these days to pick the last update to the PREVIOUS version as your 'stable' production install to use while working. Wait until they push out the next major update (ie, Cubase 5) then run out and upgrade to the PREVIOUS version before it's no longer available (ie, Cubase4) and run that until that new version hits end of line. Rinse & Repeat.
You'll get the max number of updates under that featureset, and your workarounds for known bugs will stay the same for ages! (I know people that stuck with Logic 5.3 instead of 5.51 due for this very reason, they knew what the bugs were and preferred to live with those instead of new ones for years and years).
When Cubase was first designed, it wasn't actually designed as a 'Virtual Studio' environment. It was a sequencer & that's all. It was midi only as well with no audio recording & multitracking. Just a midi sequencer. It then evolved into a midi & audio sequencer while still on the Atari. It was only when Cubase moved into the PC market that Steinberg began developing it into what could be considered as a 'Virtual Studio' environment. If you develop a midi sequencer & eventually develop it into an application that for all intents & purposes can be considered as a 'Virtual Studio' environment, why on earth wouldn't you market it as such (re- 'VST')?? Yes, it's marketing, but it's not exactly misleading marketing is it??braincell wrote:I remember when Cubase switched to Cubase VST and Greg Ondo from Cubase was giving a workshop. I asked him what VST means and he said "Virtual Studio Technology", so I said "Yes, but what is VST?" Finally he had to just say it is marketing.
Free bus pass...Neil B. wrote:So I'm just getting into the new version, which'll keep me good for another 8 years before I look into upgrading to Cubase 10.6I'll even be able to use my free bus pass by then to go and buy it.
On the other hand, I was using SX3 for everything, and C4 simply didn't work... The following patches etc. never solved the main issues, and the first review that did work well was 4.5.2 - that I installed only this past week - just in time to see a new upgrade coming up...braincell wrote:I have not had any major problems with recent Cubase upgrades other than the sample rate thing which has been fixed and that didn't bother me as I was using 16 bit at the time.