Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
Do you wish that SONIC CORE supports Flexor/Adern for the new Scope 5.0 OS and for xite?
Here the place for your sign.
http://www.adern.com/home/modules.php?n ... opic&t=616
Then we send everything to S|C attention.
Erminardi
Here the place for your sign.
http://www.adern.com/home/modules.php?n ... opic&t=616
Then we send everything to S|C attention.
Erminardi
Last edited by erminardi on Fri Jul 18, 2008 3:40 am, edited 2 times in total.
4PC + Scope 5.0 + no more Xite + 2xScope Pro + 6xPulsarII + 2xLunaII + SDK + a lot of devices (Flexor III & Solaris 4.1 etc.) + Plugiator.
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
signed!
Cyril
Cyril
- FrancisHarmany
- Posts: 1078
- Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Haarmania
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
If I cant use old third-party devices I wont have much use for Xite!
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 7:24 am
- Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
Signed
In my experience, the only way to get the scope environment to sync ( I mean sync - not pseudo sync, quasi sync or almost sync ) with cubase is the Flexor ramp functionality. Without Flexor or some alternative that provides sample accurate sync of sequencer patterns, delays, LFO's etc, Xite-1 + Scope 5 is a NO GO. Period.
In my experience, the only way to get the scope environment to sync ( I mean sync - not pseudo sync, quasi sync or almost sync ) with cubase is the Flexor ramp functionality. Without Flexor or some alternative that provides sample accurate sync of sequencer patterns, delays, LFO's etc, Xite-1 + Scope 5 is a NO GO. Period.
Cheers
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
I don't recall reading antwhere that it's not supported. Have I missed something?
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
Is this related to Assaf's recent post on the Adern forum?
Erminardi, the link you posted isn't working btw.
Erminardi, the link you posted isn't working btw.
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
Sorry Shroomz, updated nowShroomz~> wrote:Is this related to Assaf's recent post on the Adern forum?
Erminardi, the link you posted isn't working btw.
4PC + Scope 5.0 + no more Xite + 2xScope Pro + 6xPulsarII + 2xLunaII + SDK + a lot of devices (Flexor III & Solaris 4.1 etc.) + Plugiator.
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
it would be insane for scope 5 not to support flexor!!!!!!
- Gordon Gekko
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: paname
-
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2001 4:00 pm
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
signed, flexor makes the scope platform into something special. not comparable with all the other software crap around!
-
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: Home By The Sea
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
Hmm maybe I'll sign it when someone can tell me where it is stated that Flexor won't run on the new scope. I thought that Flexor's announcement related to NEW DEVELOPMENT - but since Flexor 1/1.5/2 already works fine, and doesn't need to be fixed, I'm wondering where the problem is. Does Adern need to survive as a company? I can't really blame them for considering these issues.
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
I wonder, what you guys are signing, because when I follow that link, I get to a thread with less participants than this one.
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
did I miss the official statement from S|C that neither flexor will run on xite and/or scope5 nor they will support adern to make it run on xite and/or scope5?erminardi wrote:Do you wish that SONIC CORE supports Flexor/Adern for the new Scope 5.0 OS and for xite?
( assaf did not say "S|C does not support Flexor", he said "FleXor will not support Xite or Scope 5." and that's quite a difference... )
--
I'm sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.
I'm sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
Well, then we turn this petition to Adern.kylie wrote:did I miss the official statement from S|C that neither flexor will run on xite and/or scope5 nor they will support adern to make it run on xite and/or scope5?erminardi wrote:Do you wish that SONIC CORE supports Flexor/Adern for the new Scope 5.0 OS and for xite?
( assaf did not say "S|C does not support Flexor", he said "FleXor will not support Xite or Scope 5." and that's quite a difference... )
What I (we) confirm is that Flexor is fundamental for Scope, also for future developments.
I consider the success and the survival of Scope, also respect the (in)famous insolvency of CW, is due to the worth of Flexor at least to 40-50%.
I really don't desire a Flexor IV VST!!!
I hope that his development continues for Xite & OS 5.x
4PC + Scope 5.0 + no more Xite + 2xScope Pro + 6xPulsarII + 2xLunaII + SDK + a lot of devices (Flexor III & Solaris 4.1 etc.) + Plugiator.
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
If Flexor never got another upgrade I wouldn't mind really. As long as my cards are functioning the sounds I will obtain (or at least try to obtain) from flexor 3 will keep me happy. Streamlined workflow would be welcome but that all depends on SC and their attitude to modular and something tells me that this isn't a major concern for them. I don't see why flexor won't run within the scope 5 environment but time will tell... Fear not I say. How many of us are really pushing the capabilities of flexor anyway
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
Well...that sucks major ass if its true.I am about to pull the trigger on the flexor 1.5>3.0 update but i pass if it does not run on v5.
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
um... why would they make it not support flexor, they even advertise flexor on their site?
and if they dont support it, the problem must be more widespread than just flexor, it must spread to other 3rd party stuff as well.
and if they dont support it, the problem must be more widespread than just flexor, it must spread to other 3rd party stuff as well.
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
Flexor is the cutting edge of sound-design and synth design for Scope.
I don't want to see it go
I don't want to see it go
- FrancisHarmany
- Posts: 1078
- Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Haarmania
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
Why would it go ?
Wasnt it annoucned that old plugins are compatible ? I think this fuzz is for nothing.
Wasnt it annoucned that old plugins are compatible ? I think this fuzz is for nothing.
Re: Pro Flexor for Scope 5 - PETITION
I agree - Flexor is essential. IMO there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING that compares. When I got it I was blown away. I would be gutted if it didnt work on Scope 5 (although I have no intention of upgrading immediately - I will be at some point).
The question, however, is NOT if SonicCore support it. The question is if Adern support Scope 5.
I would go so far as to say that I would be more than happy to pay for an update to Flexor (if thats what it takes) to have a Scope 5 compatible version. Pretty much like I will have to pay for a scope upgrade that is VISTA compatible (not that I intend on using that awful OS until I am forced to upgrade because new hardware isnt compatible with XP-hopefully a long time).
The fact is, we dont know the full details - Assaf has made a vague comment which appears to have got a few ppls knickers in a twist.
Wonder what this means for Grainmiller and Philter though as they are yet to be released - if they ever will be?
The question, however, is NOT if SonicCore support it. The question is if Adern support Scope 5.
I would go so far as to say that I would be more than happy to pay for an update to Flexor (if thats what it takes) to have a Scope 5 compatible version. Pretty much like I will have to pay for a scope upgrade that is VISTA compatible (not that I intend on using that awful OS until I am forced to upgrade because new hardware isnt compatible with XP-hopefully a long time).
The fact is, we dont know the full details - Assaf has made a vague comment which appears to have got a few ppls knickers in a twist.
Wonder what this means for Grainmiller and Philter though as they are yet to be released - if they ever will be?
There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. These are things we don't know we don't know.