Match Equalisation Software Question
-
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Match Equalisation Software Question
Hello,
Anyone out there know of a match equaliser software or match mastering (if such a thing exists), preferably free that they would recommend? If not free, then that's ok too.
Though on the other hand, do they really work?
Just in case some of you don't know what I am on about, the idea is to play a commercial track that you like the sound of, the software makes analysis of the music and you can then copy/apply that setting to your own music.
Thanks
Anyone out there know of a match equaliser software or match mastering (if such a thing exists), preferably free that they would recommend? If not free, then that's ok too.
Though on the other hand, do they really work?
Just in case some of you don't know what I am on about, the idea is to play a commercial track that you like the sound of, the software makes analysis of the music and you can then copy/apply that setting to your own music.
Thanks
- BingoTheClowno
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
Yes, it is available at www.audio-utopia.com
Not free but both extremely powerful:
http://www.har-bal.com/ [only for equalization, I really like it!!!]
http://www.curioza.com/ [for all mastering chain]
http://www.har-bal.com/ [only for equalization, I really like it!!!]
http://www.curioza.com/ [for all mastering chain]
4PC + Scope 5.0 + no more Xite + 2xScope Pro + 6xPulsarII + 2xLunaII + SDK + a lot of devices (Flexor III & Solaris 4.1 etc.) + Plugiator.
the 'link' is an irony....Lima wrote:the link doesn't work here

but there is (or was...) in fact a product that does exactly what's requested above - I just can't remember the context, but it was real (and commercial).
Understandably, if you're in a business and time is money - otherwise an entire contradiction to work and creativity.
If you can't deal with it - leave it, one doesn't have to

cheers, Tom
(hopelessly oldfashioned)
- BingoTheClowno
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
Lima wrote:the link doesn't work here


Seriously, I believe that the requested function is impossible to implement just by analysing the spectrum of a wave. There is no information about the original source amplitude level or equalisation in a WAV file!
There is a VST that extracts IMPULSE RESPONSES to model echo/reverb responses.
-
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 4:00 pm
-
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 4:00 pm
-
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Another question regarding Ozone 3. I went to the website to have a look and I see it is for 64 bit operating systems. Hopefully this isn't too dumb a question, but will it work on my 32 bit machines. If so, seeing it is for 64 bit, will working in 32 bit compromise the quality or efficiency?
Thanks
Thanks
If I didn't remember bad, the IZOTOPE mastering tool has a similar function.astroman wrote:the 'link' is an irony....Lima wrote:the link doesn't work here
but there is (or was...) in fact a product that does exactly what's requested above - I just can't remember the context, but it was real (and commercial).

Welcome to the dawning of a new empire
that 64 bit applies to the 'processing bits' of the calculation - it has nothing to do with a 64bit OS. CWA's old TripleDat (and the respective plugins) had 80 bit precision calculations > 10 years ago 
The company has a good reputation, but it's a 'regular' mastering suite where you choose the tools and how they are applied.
The system I referred to was based (most likely) on a convolution scheme and it analysed example tracks to extract their 'soundprint'.
cheers, Tom

The company has a good reputation, but it's a 'regular' mastering suite where you choose the tools and how they are applied.
The system I referred to was based (most likely) on a convolution scheme and it analysed example tracks to extract their 'soundprint'.
cheers, Tom
Hey man optimaster is a creamware mastering tool, and it has a "wizard" function which has a go at auto mastering for you.Astral Fridge Magnet wrote:No. Never heard of it.wayne wrote:Tried Optimaster wizard?
Although it won't make Bach out of Laibach, or vice-versa, it has presets, and it makes your mix sound good.
- ChrisWerner
- Posts: 1738
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: Germany/Bavaria
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 4:00 pm
- Location: london
I use har-bal, masterverb pro, optimaster, waves stereo imager, psyq and waves L3 for my mastering chain.
Before I was using all waves tdm plugins, but I think that Optimaster, despite his 3 bands, sounds better (less "software") than waves LinMB/C4 (5 bands).
I'm looking for UAD Precision Multiband & Precision Limiter but actually I'm ok with Creamware.
Har-bal is really amazing as comparison lin EQ and/or simply as EQ...the auto gain feature is very useful when U compare your work with any other audio reference.
Before I was using all waves tdm plugins, but I think that Optimaster, despite his 3 bands, sounds better (less "software") than waves LinMB/C4 (5 bands).
I'm looking for UAD Precision Multiband & Precision Limiter but actually I'm ok with Creamware.
Har-bal is really amazing as comparison lin EQ and/or simply as EQ...the auto gain feature is very useful when U compare your work with any other audio reference.
4PC + Scope 5.0 + no more Xite + 2xScope Pro + 6xPulsarII + 2xLunaII + SDK + a lot of devices (Flexor III & Solaris 4.1 etc.) + Plugiator.