Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 5:24 pm
by petal
Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 6:50 pm
by braincell
yet another expence.
Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:50 pm
by arela
Looks like a "must buy"
(even i'm sure my sx3.2 is moore than enough for me

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:04 am
by H-Rave
3.1.1.944 stop that it builds up my hopes.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: H-Rave on 2006-09-06 11:05 ]</font>
Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:30 am
by petal
Rumour has it that Cubase 4 (not SX'y anymore?

) will be released this year.
Steinberg has announced that there will be a free maintenance update of the official SX3 verison 3.1.1 to 3.1.2 within the second half of 2006:
http://www.cubase.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=47139
Thomas
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: petal on 2006-09-06 11:35 ]</font>
Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:47 pm
by arela
seems i did round off

3.1.1 build 944 is very close to 3.2
Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:51 pm
by braincell
I feel like I am held hostage because I have version 2 and if I fall more behind it will get more expensive to upgrade. Eventually it fails as it will not work on new operating systems nor will I be able to easily work with other musicians.
I just didn't think there was a big enough difference between version 2 and 3 of sx. It was a money grab.
One time I waited so long to upgrade that they almost lost my registration. It turned out to be on a card, in a closet, in a back room.
Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:08 pm
by hubird
Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:15 pm
by astroman
On 2006-09-06 13:51, braincell wrote:
...One time I waited so long to upgrade that they almost lost my registration. It turned out to be on a card, in a closet, in a back room.
if it would have been on a HD file, the motor probably would have refused to spin up...
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: astroman on 2006-09-06 14:17 ]</font>
Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:27 pm
by alfonso
Most of the stuff in my SX3.1 is not used as I do everything in Scope, I'll upgrade only if new audio bitrates are included at least 32bits fixed, otherwise I really don't know what reason to spend more money could I have....
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 7:43 am
by H-Rave
Apparently after Windows Xp and Vista they're going to call it Windows 3.2 ?
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 7:56 am
by Zer
same shit as every year, James.