Cubase 4

Please remember the terms of your membership agreement.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
petal
Posts: 2354
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Copenhagen
Contact:

Post by petal »

I was surfing around the cubase forum, and found this (for some of us) interesting thread:

http://forum.cubase.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=53664

well, actually the most interesting part about that thread was gone, but I did some more searching, and found these:

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

I thought it might interest some of you guys as well :smile:

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: petal on 2006-09-05 18:25 ]</font>
User avatar
braincell
Posts: 5943
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Washington DC

Post by braincell »

yet another expence.
arela
Posts: 858
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Norway

Post by arela »

Looks like a "must buy"
(even i'm sure my sx3.2 is moore than enough for me :smile:
H-Rave
Posts: 569
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Toulouse, France
Contact:

Post by H-Rave »

3.1.1.944 stop that it builds up my hopes.
:smile:


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: H-Rave on 2006-09-06 11:05 ]</font>
petal
Posts: 2354
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Copenhagen
Contact:

Post by petal »

Rumour has it that Cubase 4 (not SX'y anymore? :wink: ) will be released this year.

Steinberg has announced that there will be a free maintenance update of the official SX3 verison 3.1.1 to 3.1.2 within the second half of 2006:

http://www.cubase.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=47139

Thomas :smile:



<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: petal on 2006-09-06 11:35 ]</font>
arela
Posts: 858
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Norway

Post by arela »

seems i did round off :smile: 3.1.1 build 944 is very close to 3.2
User avatar
braincell
Posts: 5943
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Washington DC

Post by braincell »

I feel like I am held hostage because I have version 2 and if I fall more behind it will get more expensive to upgrade. Eventually it fails as it will not work on new operating systems nor will I be able to easily work with other musicians.

I just didn't think there was a big enough difference between version 2 and 3 of sx. It was a money grab.

One time I waited so long to upgrade that they almost lost my registration. It turned out to be on a card, in a closet, in a back room.
hubird

Post by hubird »

:lol:
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8455
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by astroman »

On 2006-09-06 13:51, braincell wrote:
...One time I waited so long to upgrade that they almost lost my registration. It turned out to be on a card, in a closet, in a back room.
if it would have been on a HD file, the motor probably would have refused to spin up... :razz:

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: astroman on 2006-09-06 14:17 ]</font>
User avatar
alfonso
Posts: 2225
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Fregene.
Contact:

Post by alfonso »

Most of the stuff in my SX3.1 is not used as I do everything in Scope, I'll upgrade only if new audio bitrates are included at least 32bits fixed, otherwise I really don't know what reason to spend more money could I have....
H-Rave
Posts: 569
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Toulouse, France
Contact:

Post by H-Rave »

Apparently after Windows Xp and Vista they're going to call it Windows 3.2 ?
User avatar
Zer
Posts: 2510
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Zer »

same shit as every year, James.
Post Reply