I know there have been threads about this, and Ive read them all. However there dont seem to be a solution to this problem. At least I couldnt find it.
Ive got the problem after removing a scsi controller with 2 HD attached, and putting in 1 sata disk on raid controller. Striped the drive and it works allthough theres only 1 drive. I have 2 other sata drives on my other 2 onboard sata controllers. This seems to have caused my problem with PCI capacity limit reached. It seems strange that removing a scsi controller and adding a sata disk could cause this.
I use Asus P4C800 Deluxe, 1 Gb dual channel ram and no other pci cards. Is there anyone who can help..?
Ive never had the problem before my reconfiguration...
I have tried the bios settings that the manual suggests, with no luck.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: stoolie on 2005-03-30 07:01 ]</font>
PCI capacity limit reached
I just found out that in my device manager
->Creamware Pulsar2->General it states:
PCI bus 2, device 13, function 0 and for my WinXP promise fastTrak i states:
PCI bus 2, device 4, function 0
This must meen that there is a conflict right? Would it be the solution to move my card to slot 1 or can i do something with some proggie og util to solve this?
->Creamware Pulsar2->General it states:
PCI bus 2, device 13, function 0 and for my WinXP promise fastTrak i states:
PCI bus 2, device 4, function 0
This must meen that there is a conflict right? Would it be the solution to move my card to slot 1 or can i do something with some proggie og util to solve this?
Hoi,
That does not mean there is a conflict. It just means that both cards are on the PCI bus, each have assigned a location number and the device mentioned is the first on that location or so. PCI overload is not a consequence of direct conflict. Conflicting IRQ's can cause other problems, but not PCI overload if I remember well.
Maybe the other card hogs the PCI bus, that's well possible. There's a small PCI tool mentioned here on z, search for 'set PCI latency' for example. This should help you further.
at0m.
That does not mean there is a conflict. It just means that both cards are on the PCI bus, each have assigned a location number and the device mentioned is the first on that location or so. PCI overload is not a consequence of direct conflict. Conflicting IRQ's can cause other problems, but not PCI overload if I remember well.
Maybe the other card hogs the PCI bus, that's well possible. There's a small PCI tool mentioned here on z, search for 'set PCI latency' for example. This should help you further.
at0m.
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio