motherboard with really great PCI bandwidth

PC Configurations, motherboards, etc, etc

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
AltMR
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Poland

Post by AltMR »

Could anybody recommend me a motherboard, which allows to work properly with 3 CW boards connected by STDM bus?
Is really possible to use all DSP's of, for example, 3 Powerpulsars in XTC mode?
I need advice from somebody, who has experienced with it.
Now I have VIA K266a, and I allways see error message "PCI capacity limit reached" if I exceed 50 % of my DSP power (2xPulsar II).
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23255
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

most intel 800 series chipset based boards will do that. personally, an intel brand mobo is my choice for ease of use ver. performance.....
User avatar
Mr Arkadin
Posts: 3280
Joined: Thu May 24, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Mr Arkadin »

i'm a Maccer just entering the world of PC, but my research has shown that anything VIA seems to be bad. Check out other's set-ups here.

Mr A

PS. Also you need to be aware that having 9 DSPs spread across three boards is not as good as, say, having a 6 DSP board + 3 DSPs, as you may encounter phase errors if you load a larger device and it gets loaded 'across' the three cards, rather than loaded all on one 6 DSP card (if you see what i mean).
User avatar
darkrezin
Posts: 2123
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: crackney

Post by darkrezin »

He's talkin about Powerpulsars :wink:
User avatar
Mr Arkadin
Posts: 3280
Joined: Thu May 24, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Mr Arkadin »

Oh yeah, i thought he said 3xPowerSamplers :blush: Still needs to get rid of the VIA though.
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7351
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Post by valis »

VIA is definately to be avoided. The heresay is that this year their products finally eliminate all concerns, but they've been saying that since 99 or so...get an Intel chipset.
AltMR
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Poland

Post by AltMR »

Thanks, but I asked for concrete examples of motherboards. I thought there were some models which have very good PCI bandwith in particular. You know, I have 2 pulsars II now, and maybe I'll add third board in the future. I just don't want to spend much time on experiments and troubles. I'd like to be sure that I'll be able to exploit all the power of my DSP's.
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23255
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

intel d865perl
intel d875pbz
hubird

Post by hubird »

Image
User avatar
MikeRaphone
Posts: 181
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: slovenia

Post by MikeRaphone »

haven't posted anything in a while, just to serve justice- my goode olde KT400 works smooth(knock on wood), and i can load 8-9 masterverbs into my pulsar II before PCI floods , I guess some people have had negative expiriences with VIA chipsets, but this one works fine(Mobo; MSI KT-400V, Athlon)
Dont know how it behaves with multiple boards though, will let you know soon :smile:
May all sentient beings achieve liberation from suffering :)
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

Hold wood :grin: One can simply not take the risk. I tried VIA in the times of p3, I lost 4-5 months fixing it. It was an interesting journey through computer technics, but this is what AltMR wants to avoid if I understand it well. :eek:

I never had PCI bandwidth issues on P4B533 with Intel 845E chipset, it loads 13 Masterverbs or so with is more than I'll ever use. Same has been confirmed by other Pulsarians.
I do have issues with freezes upon loading an STS sampler, I have no idea where these come from :/ I doubt it's mobo related though.

Also, any additional 3rd party hardware with lousy drivers (I think of network cards, USB stuff) can bring the PCI performance to it's knees, so choose the accessories carefully.

Oh, and avoid Deluxe editions of motherboards. A glimpse at the problem and tech forums will tell you why. AGP, IDE, 6 slots - anything else you want on a motherboard? Get a decent PCI card for it.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: at0m|c on 2004-08-11 10:52 ]</font>
AltMR
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Poland

Post by AltMR »

On 2004-08-10 20:30, garyb wrote:
intel d865perl
intel d875pbz
Thanks, Garyb.

I must say, that apart from problems with PCI described here, my computer is very very stabile.
My configuration:
Athlon 2000+XP
VIA KT266a, Soltek
768 Mb DDRAM kingston
ATI Radeon 700, 2 monitors
Seagate Baraccuda 60 Gb 7200 rpm
CD-RW LG
2x pulsar II
no additional harware
Win XP Pro with SP 1
Cubase SX 2.2

I tested XTC mode - in project with about 40-50 audio tracks and many native plug-ins (50% CPU), I was able to connect only 6 MasterVerbs on sends (FX channels). I also noticed, that I could't use too many PEQs. So, the main problem is a quantity of connections between Scope harware and host.
I would say, 15 of MasterVerbs would be a good result, but 50 of PEQs would be much better for me...

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: AltMR on 2004-08-11 17:57 ]</font>
bronYaur
Posts: 156
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Italy

Post by bronYaur »

I have old 850 MRV2 intel MB no Bandwhit problem,I have 3 cards (powerpulsar scope srb and pulsar 2)consider this: http://www.intel.com/design/motherbd/cv ... bd_d925xcv&

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: bronYaur on 2004-08-13 07:38 ]</font>
User avatar
dehuszar
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Chicago, IL United States of Amnesia

Post by dehuszar »

Anyone using an Athlon 64? I was doing some research and the "Direct Connect [Market]ecture" claims to open up traditional bottlenecks to and from processor memory. Now the PCI bus is usually what gives us problems, but the goal is to get from the the PCI bus to memory, to the processor. So theoretically, the Athlon 64/Opteron architecture should do great things for our platform. But no one seems to have made much mention of it yet.

Anyone?

Sam
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23255
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

i believe wsippel had a thing for that processor...
Post Reply