PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com

Mr Arkadin wrote:

niceboy wrote:You dont seems to understand .
We dont want your crap advice, because you just dont understand.

As predicted. Priceless.

Just get off my back with your English crap.
Bear

niceboy wrote:Just get off my back with your English crap.
Bear

Oh, so you're a xenophobe too. Nice.

niceboy wrote: You dont seems to understand .
We dont want your crap advice, because you just dont understand.

you are just someone without any communication skills and without basic understanding of how to handle a studio.
So you're doomed to fail as a producer

siriusbliss wrote:

hubird wrote:are you sure about the mix file?
It sounds extremely thin in the midlows and lows, with only some vague sub lows if I turn the bass up to max.

I agree.
It's sounding thin now with the lead guitar prominent in the mids.
I also don't hear much stereo 'spread'.

G

I did not have time , but now to you.

http://soundcloud.com/bjorn-olofsson/br ... ys-demo-13

On this drums is much easier because its normal rock tempo,
and here we already recorded a third guitar.
The heavy rytmguitar.
We putted in an organ to describe that only the organ and drums is on the sides.
First rythmguitar is -4 and +4 left right to be where its supposed to be.
In the middle.
Also here we are going to use Synth instead of Organ on the sides
when one more rytmguitar , but the drums is not good.
When we put in new rytm today we will make the drums much more clear.
Maybe Organ will be okey far in the backround I dont know.
We dont want now more Yellow Submarine technic Crap.
Can we have an american feedback Soundenginere please ,
They silently work and teach after many years of studies.
Normally 6 years for a Masters Degree.
Bear

niceboy wrote:We dont want now more Yellow Submarine technic Crap.

Wow, are you really now saying that you're better than George Martin and The Beatles because they didn't use 'exclusive muffled through pillow feedback' technique? Keep believeing guy!

Mr Arkadin wrote:

niceboy wrote:We dont want now more Yellow Submarine technic Crap.

Wow, are you really now saying that you're better than George Martin and The Beatles because they didn't use 'exclusive muffled through pillow feedback' technique? Keep believeing guy!

I say it one more time
"Get Off My Back"
We dont want your Crap.
People dont want to listen to that crap.
Bear

niceboy wrote:I say it one more time
"Get Off My Back"

I'm not 'on your back', I seriously want to know if you believe that George Martin's techniques and decades of 'traditional' recording in general is, in your opnion, inferior to your feedback technique?

niceboy wrote:People dont want to listen to that crap.

Well I don't think you speak for 'the people'.

Mr Arkadin wrote:

niceboy wrote:I say it one more time
"Get Off My Back"

I'm not 'on your back', I seriously want to know if you believe that George Martin's techniques and decades of 'traditional' recording in general is, in your opnion, inferior to your feedback technique?

niceboy wrote:People dont want to listen to that crap.

Well I don't think you speak for 'the people'.

Well I speak for some companies that made new plugins used here.
Just recently this summer.
Made specially for DSP feedback setup.
Thats here in Scope.
Also with built in feedback .
So why dont you go to some other Thread with your stupid acting.

http://soundcloud.com/bjorn-olofsson/br ... ys-demo-13

Bear

And that's where we say, ok....C U Next Time

something for you niceboy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e82VE8UtW8A

hubird wrote:something for you niceboy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e82VE8UtW8A

Why do you want me to listen there.
Or watch .
Bear

well, just because of the title of Rihanna's song, as opposed to your nickname.
but the production is also great, I could learn from it

Look, I'm a jerk, if I want to, but Mr Arkadin took the effort to explain you decently why he thinks you're rude.
I would take him seriously.
He predicted your reaction precisely, that should make you think.

hubird wrote:Tip: make picture(s) smaller, no one will ever see the whole thing this way.

but now one knows that Brooklyn Bridge has a couple of very nice dihedral ascents
(just not sure where to place pro to protect the climb...)

cheers, Tom

Well, no one minus one then, if that sounds logically

niceboy wrote:

hubird wrote:something for you niceboy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e82VE8UtW8A

Why do you want me to listen there.
Or watch .
Bear

Because you are very Intelligent and totally get the pun...

And your "Mixing" is not good.

Also
your
communication
skills
are
not
good.

And did i mention that you sound like you were Raised on a Salted Pickle?

Put some good Recordings up to support your self centered egostyle Posting or Gtfo!

countin' down from 88 what you'll be called in just a moment...

Doesn´t bother me.Cant take him serious for even one Picosec....Really, what a Sucker with too much Money.

Fluxpod wrote: Doesn´t bother me.Cant take him serious for even one Picosec....Really, what a Sucker with too much Money.

You dont really understand .
We dont give a shit about anything you say,
because you are just shit, and I understand why also.
Go and give your shit advice somewhere else.
Bear

well, at least I got the color right

astroman wrote:countin' down from 88 what you'll be called in just a moment...

So you you did not get married ,
is that why you follow after people.
So you dont understand that Fat Inserts , Fat Cat ,
Mus Eq and Sat where made to do feedback.
Recently made was at least Fat Inserts.
Or maybe you just drink a lot of alkohol,
so you lost your ability to make conclusions.
Brooklyn Bridge symbolises going from PCI to Xite.
We got BxV2 for free before and we got Transient Designer.
on one off the two cards from Spain.
and the pic is PCI 45 dsp.
Using only half.
Bear