Sonic Timeworks : Classic Plate released

Planet Z Announcements

Moderators: valis, garyb

medusa13
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Post by medusa13 »

I think the price is 100 US dollars.

Warp69, you are pushing me to spend more money that I can . . .
But it's just too good. I can't help doing so :smile:

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: medusa13 on 2004-09-27 12:46 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: medusa13 on 2004-09-28 00:43 ]</font>
bbrian
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 4:00 pm

Post by bbrian »

Wow, I am continually amazed by Warp69! First we get a great deal on the best software plate verb, then a monster chorus/delay bonus, and now these double algorithm packs! All of these devices are must buys for Creamware users!

@Warp69: see if you can get CWAudio to post some CD100 pics or info along with the P100, this is a nice incentive to purchase.

Also, I have heard of a trick from several engineers. Sometimes they like to use 2 reverbs (hall or plate), panned hard left/right, with slightly different modulation settings to create a very wide reverb field. Is there some way to add an "offset" to the modulation, so that the L/R modulations are still linked, but one side has a different phase (ie sin for left, sin+180 for right) or slightly faster/slower modulation? I'm not sure if this is possible if the modulations are very randomized...or if this is possible at all with the algorithm?
hubird

Post by hubird »

it makes them both mono though :sad:
I would prefer two reverbs of different room/length etc, combined with smart delaying.
If you put an exiter followed by a stereo widthener on it during mastering you may get a more wide effect than with two mono reverbs :smile:
off topic, sorry :smile:


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: hubird on 2004-09-27 18:09 ]</font>
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8446
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by astroman »

On 2004-09-27 17:01, bbrian wrote:
... Also, I have heard of a trick from several engineers. Sometimes they like to use 2 reverbs (hall or plate), panned hard left/right, with slightly different modulation settings to create a very wide reverb field...
I have successfully roughplated with the SPX90 and fineplated the return by the P100 :razz:

You also might try some of Flexors phase tricks in front of P100 or...
hell, I love this system, and what it's developers achieve :grin:
who needs engineers tricks if one can invent a dozen per hour :wink:

cheers, Tom
rodos1979
Posts: 736
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Greece

Post by rodos1979 »

:blush..Warp, plz forgive my stupidness! I hadnt paid attention to the file extension so I was trying to load the .pre file! :blush

All is well now! Everything working and everything sounding excellent! :wink:

Cheers!
medway
Posts: 229
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by medway »

On 2004-09-27 17:01, bbrian wrote:
Wow, I am continually amazed by Warp69! First we get a great deal on the best software plate verb, then a monster chorus/delay bonus, and now these double algorithm packs! All of these devices are must buys for Creamware users!

@Warp69: see if you can get CWAudio to post some CD100 pics or info along with the P100, this is a nice incentive to purchase.

Also, I have heard of a trick from several engineers. Sometimes they like to use 2 reverbs (hall or plate), panned hard left/right, with slightly different modulation settings to create a very wide reverb field. Is there some way to add an "offset" to the modulation, so that the L/R modulations are still linked, but one side has a different phase (ie sin for left, sin+180 for right) or slightly faster/slower modulation? I'm not sure if this is possible if the modulations are very randomized...or if this is possible at all with the algorithm?
Or how about just giving us a mono version that only takes half the dsp. Then you can load two different instances, with different settings.

Jesse
bbrian
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 4:00 pm

Post by bbrian »

Yes, a lite mono version would be a cool thing, the more I think about it, the less I can see my idea working! I am guessing that the modulation is handled by some sort of slow random LFO, and thus there could be no offset on the LFO cycle. Two mono verbs with different size/modulation/color would probably sound good though, but I am much more anxious about just getting the ambience/hall algorithms!

Or a suprise AMS RMX-16 emulation...
Warp69
Posts: 679
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Warp69 »

Hey,

It would not be possible to create a lite mono version that only takes half the dsp - I could probably save 20%.

But I think I'll finish the other algorithms before any update of the plate.

Cheers
Warp69
Posts: 679
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Warp69 »

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Warp69 on 2005-09-02 00:28 ]</font>
bbrian
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 4:00 pm

Post by bbrian »

Yes! I forgot about the Ursa, what a cool old piece of gear. Man count me in for a 2016 clone too. Doesn't it have some RMX 16 simulation modes in it? Those things sound really warm. I say copy their old Princeton 2016!

I can't believe they want $500 for the Ursa Major or $700 for the 2016...put them to shame for us!

You seem to be great at simulating these great devices, have you ever considered emulating a Roland Dimension D chorus? Those things are really unique and full sounding.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: bbrian on 2004-09-30 00:11 ]</font>
User avatar
sandrob
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Slavonski Brod - Croatia
Contact:

Post by sandrob »

i use cw masterverb pro, also uad's and nice powercore's verbs, but this one is something different and special.
'must have' - i agree. :smile:

btw: i send request 2 days ago and i still waiting for key? i guees because of weekend?
AndreD
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg-audio.de
Contact:

Post by AndreD »

I´m waiting too since 3 days :wink:
User avatar
sandrob
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Slavonski Brod - Croatia
Contact:

Post by sandrob »

still waiting...
AndreD
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg-audio.de
Contact:

Post by AndreD »

...and waiting.. :wink:
Warp69
Posts: 679
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Warp69 »

Hi,

Please contact craig at cc (AT) sonictimeworks (DOT) com.

Best regards
AndreD
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg-audio.de
Contact:

Post by AndreD »

still waiting...
User avatar
sandrob
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Slavonski Brod - Croatia
Contact:

Post by sandrob »

i send request string to cc... and still waiting...
now 'double waiting'. :roll:
User avatar
sandrob
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Slavonski Brod - Croatia
Contact:

Post by sandrob »

finaly i got key from cc :smile:
thanks, warp (or kim?!?) for this nice reverb :wink:
bbrian
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 4:00 pm

Post by bbrian »

So, any news Warp69? If you already have some algos done, is it possible to do some shadey back-alley deal where I can buy them right now, or try out some pre-releases? I'm close to dropping $200 on the Princeton 2016 verb but I would much rather spend that on your devices!
Warp69
Posts: 679
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Warp69 »

Hey,

Unfortunately I dont have any news right now. The Ambience/Inverse algorithms are finished and so are the RHall/Concert Hall algorithms. I dont have any release date since Im waiting for a response from STW.

Regarding the SP2016 - I really think you should support developers with high quality products, like Princeton. They did a bold moved with the vst version.

Kind regards


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Warp69 on 2005-09-02 00:29 ]</font>
Post Reply