Celmo's Flaming Super XDZ5W 2000 Master Killer Pumpkin Filte

Scope device files created using the Scope SDK

Moderators: valis, garyb

blazesboylan
Posts: 777
Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: The Great White North
Contact:

Post by blazesboylan »

Review of Celmo's Flaming Super XDZ5W 2000 Master Killer Pumpkin Filter

Johann

P.S. I'll get started on that preset archive tomorrow, I promise... Sheepish :smile: ...
User avatar
ChrisWerner
Posts: 1738
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Germany/Bavaria
Contact:

Post by ChrisWerner »

Wow, I am a bit speechles. I never had a plug that obtain his aim on a high quality level such this.
Only one button and your music changes completly to something really clear and athmospheric.
I know many music tracks that could benefit from this plug.

Another marvelous work from Celmo.
Plato
Posts: 463
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Plato »

Image
Review of the century, blazesboylan - Sound On Sound attains new heights of literary eloquence
Image

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Plato on 2004-06-26 06:35 ]</font>
User avatar
kensuguro
Posts: 4434
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: BPM 60 to somewhere around 150
Contact:

Post by kensuguro »

You need to hear the sound of this filter to actually understand its quality. I took the liberty of making a sound demo that captures the performance of the pumpkin filter.

http://www.iface.ne.jp/~ken/pumpkinfilterdemo.mp3

In the beginning half, you can hear how the pumpkin filter has rebuilt the low end, mids, and high end to sound perfectly similar to the original signal. I suppse Celmo has used some sort of STFT reverse synthesis mechanism.. still, pumpkin filter can rebuild the signal so much alike the orignal signal, that perhaps there are some hidden secondary resynthesis algorythms. I'm guessing there is some form of simple granular synthesis going on... or some sort of sample manipulation, as the reconstructed sound is sample accurate when compared to the original signal.

In the second half, the pumpkin filter has colorized the signal to sound like silence. As you can hear, Celmo's "silence" has a certain warm, phat, vintage feel to it that is reminiscent of all his other devices. I tried comparing pumpkin filter's "silence" to silence from Cooledit, Soundforge, Wavelab, and even ModIII, but Pumpkin filter's silence had most character, being totally dead, dark, and so.. "not there".

All in all, this device is a completed, polished product for the most professional musician. 20 years ago, this feat may have seemed impossible to achieve with the slow processors and weak DSPs of the time. Years have gone by, and now, finally, we can have perfectly modeled, physically accurate, totally custimizable silence at our fingertips.

Got a bad mix? Run it through pumpkin filter and shut it off.
rodos1979
Posts: 736
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Greece

Post by rodos1979 »

Lol! :grin:

Hilarious posts and reviews Blaze and Ken! :grin:

You made my day! :smile:
Spirit
Posts: 2661
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Terra Australis

Post by Spirit »

The Waves version was definitely inferior. But now I'm considering going hardware. The NoPass filter especially caught my attention.

Image

http://www.synthesizers.com/q199.html

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Spirit on 2004-06-26 19:07 ]</font>
Music Manic
Posts: 1743
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by Music Manic »

Funny guys.
Took it serious at first coz Celmo plugins are onw of my favourites.How did it get in SOS?
hubird

Post by hubird »

On 2004-06-27 01:12, Music Manic wrote:
How did it get in SOS?
check the url of the review link... :lol:
User avatar
ChrisWerner
Posts: 1738
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Germany/Bavaria
Contact:

Post by ChrisWerner »

On 2004-06-27 07:56, hubird wrote:
On 2004-06-27 01:12, Music Manic wrote:
How did it get in SOS?
check the url of the review link... :lol:
<img src="http://www.pepp.de/hilfe/PIX/rofl.gif"></img>
blazesboylan
Posts: 777
Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: The Great White North
Contact:

Post by blazesboylan »

On 2004-06-26 07:08, kensuguro wrote:
Got a bad mix? Run it through pumpkin filter and shut it off.
I think Ken has hit the nail on the head with this one. In fact, I can think of numerous pop songs that would benefit immensely from Celmo's new plugin. :grin: Maybe this plugin is really designed for mastering engineers -- the Fairchild 670 of binary filters...

Spirit: you can go hardware if you want. But the problem is THERE IS NO "ON" SWITCH!!! :razz:

Cheers,

Johann

P.S. Edit: Ken is right, this is for mastering. From the horse's mouth:
Simply an Ultra Efficient Master Killer (UEMK)

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: blazesboylan on 2004-06-28 03:23 ]</font>
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23364
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

thank you for existing.
without you guys, i wouldn't be capable.
Spirit
Posts: 2661
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Terra Australis

Post by Spirit »

On 2004-06-28 03:22, blazesboylan wrote:
Spirit: you can go hardware if you want. But the problem is THERE IS NO "ON" SWITCH!!!
Quite right :sad: I see now that Celmo's GUI allows much finer control of the most important filter parameters. I always seem to come back to the SFP devices in the end...
Liquid EDGE
Posts: 1205
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Brighton England
Contact:

Post by Liquid EDGE »

simply fantastic :lol:

think i'll use this to improve my lil sisters hi fi.
User avatar
Nestor
Posts: 6683
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Fourth Dimension Paradise, Cloud Nine!

Post by Nestor »

I thought you would never do something better than the BAM! :lol:
sonolive
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Digital AudioSoft
Contact:

Post by sonolive »

fantastic tool !!!
why don't you try to build a hardware version of it ??? i'm sure you are able to !

a+++
olive
Post Reply