Bad idea to install a PCI SATA controller card?
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:00 pm
My mobo doesn't support disks larger than 120 gb but I need more space, much more space. My friend wants to sell me a Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 200GB S-ATA together with a one port S-ATA controller (PCI) for quite a good price. Do you think my mobo can handle it without PCI overflows or other problems? In this moment the Luna card is my only PCI card.
My spec's:
Asus P4T533-c
P4 2.4 Ghz 533 FSB
Samsung 512 mb RAMBUS 1020 @ 1200 Mhz
Geforce 4 Ti 4200 64 mb
WD 120 gb, 8mb cache
IBM 60 gb. 2mb cache
Nec ND-1300A
Luna card + 8 channel I/O-box running SFP 3.1c in Windows Xp
My spec's:
Asus P4T533-c
P4 2.4 Ghz 533 FSB
Samsung 512 mb RAMBUS 1020 @ 1200 Mhz
Geforce 4 Ti 4200 64 mb
WD 120 gb, 8mb cache
IBM 60 gb. 2mb cache
Nec ND-1300A
Luna card + 8 channel I/O-box running SFP 3.1c in Windows Xp
-
- Posts: 2310
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: Canada/France
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:00 pm
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:00 pm
"don't do it" is my opinion. you need more than 120gig for your WORKING files? i agree with marcus,get a firewire or usb drive to archive the stuff you are not currently working on. you have 2 ide slots which can control 4 devices.if one is a cd or dvd burner and one is your program data,that leaves space for two 120gig drives. is that not enough for your current working files?
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:00 pm
Thanks for the answers. I love this community, I chose my system parts after suggestions from this site. Anyways,
actually I wanted to buy a large and fast disk that I could use on my next system, an "investment for the future"
. But after your anwers I
guess I'l buy another 120 gb disk or try to find an external disk second hand.
Another question:
It seems like the usb devices share resources with the PCI-busses. Doesn't that mean that an external disk is as bad as an internal?
actually I wanted to buy a large and fast disk that I could use on my next system, an "investment for the future"

guess I'l buy another 120 gb disk or try to find an external disk second hand.
Another question:
It seems like the usb devices share resources with the PCI-busses. Doesn't that mean that an external disk is as bad as an internal?
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:00 pm
I can't afford a separate DAW system. It's a little embarrasing. But I can assure you that 120 gb isn't even near the amount of hd memory I need for recordings, samples and programs. Maybe 240 gb's for the music related stuff and the same amount of memory for the rest.
Edit:
Oops I didn't get the bit that the USB disk was meant for archiving. Can't understand how I could miss that and it's not very respectful to start a new topic and not read the answers properly. I am sorry for this and blame my lack of sleep. That's quite a good solution. It's a shame that those disks are that expensive.
You have all been of great help!
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Synaesthetic on 2004-03-02 21:25 ]</font>
Edit:
Oops I didn't get the bit that the USB disk was meant for archiving. Can't understand how I could miss that and it's not very respectful to start a new topic and not read the answers properly. I am sorry for this and blame my lack of sleep. That's quite a good solution. It's a shame that those disks are that expensive.
You have all been of great help!
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Synaesthetic on 2004-03-02 21:25 ]</font>
Garyb, i want to buy a lacie hd where i'll put all my cakewalk project/data. One hd only for rec as you told me. now i'm using 2 hd (seagate III and IV 7200rpm,40+80Gig). is it possiable to hook another big hd (external firewire)like LaCie Bigger Disk (1 terabyte capacity) or lacie Big Disk (500Gb)? My setup--- Asus P4T mobo,512 RDRAM,Pentium 4 (1.4).(Maybe not so good setup for hook a big hd),Pulsar2+On 2004-03-02 12:40, garyb wrote:
i use an external usb hard drive to unload stuff that will not be used in the near future.
Thanks
*FireWire 800: 800 Mbits/s;--- does it means 100Mb/sec!! 1 track 16 bit needs 5Mb/min or 0.083Mb/sec..... in that case 100Mb/sec is huge!!!!
* http://www.lacie.com/products/product.htm?id=10123
No matter how fast the bus you're using is, you will always be limited by the speed of the slowest thing in it.
With a Firewire 800 bus, even though it is theoretically capable of 100MB/sec (although real-world performance will be significantly lower), the hard drive connected to it will certainly not be capable of that kind of speed.
It's certainly a good thing for connecting several firewire devices though.. I wish more PC motherboards/laptops came with FW800.
With a Firewire 800 bus, even though it is theoretically capable of 100MB/sec (although real-world performance will be significantly lower), the hard drive connected to it will certainly not be capable of that kind of speed.
It's certainly a good thing for connecting several firewire devices though.. I wish more PC motherboards/laptops came with FW800.