Considering the RECORDING MIXER...

An area for people to discuss Scope related problems, issues, etc.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
MeloManiac
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by MeloManiac »

Is it really as low on DSP as Creamware states, compared to the BM? I'll miss the busses, but if I can get real low on DSP use I think I'll buy it. How about outputs. How many and which does it have? Only MIX out or what?
marcuspocus
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Canada/France

Post by marcuspocus »

Like i said in a previous thread, Recording Mixer is for...well...RECORDING, And yes it is much lower in DSP usage. But for mastering, still use the BigMixer. Busses are a must.

In bigmixer you can record 16 input, in recording mixer you have 24.

Usually I put 4ch Asio source, 24 Asio dest, and keep 20 input to record.

It have 3insert per ch. including Master ch. and 4aux. Less than BM, but for recording purpose, it's perfect.
Post Reply