Gigastudio and 96K

An area for people to discuss Scope related problems, issues, etc.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
beatpete
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue May 01, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by beatpete »

I can run my Gigastudio (SFP 3.1c) at 96K fine on Win 98SE but when I run Gigastudio on Win XP SP1a, the 96k option doesn't appear in the Gigastudio pull-down menu (Gigastudio 2.54) even though I've set the Luna sample rate to 96K.
Any ideas?
marcuspocus
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Canada/France

Post by marcuspocus »

Hi, i remember you from Northernsound :smile:


I don't use Giga not more, mbut maybe i can give a suggestion.

Have you tried to set your default Luna project to 96khz and including the gsif src driver in it? I mean the default project, the one that load in background automaticaly at startup.

I say this, cuz i remember that giga search his driver at windows startup and start his own thing

Then completely shutdown and reboot?
beatpete
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue May 01, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by beatpete »

marcuspocus:
Thanks for the reply, but yes I did save a 96K project with a GSIF driver as my default project and still Giga still ownly sees up to 48K.
marcuspocus
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Canada/France

Post by marcuspocus »

There's been a response posted to your thread on northernsounds which say this :

"Gigastudio does not/never has supported 96K!
As of yet anyways, maybe V3 will! "

You're sure it was working in 96k in 98?

Sorry, i really don't know myself, just asking...
beatpete
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue May 01, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by beatpete »

marcuspocus:
I saw the replies on the Northern Sounds site, but Gigastudio DOES work perfectly at 96K in Windows 98SE with my Luna card and SFP3.1c. I just can't figure out why it won't work in Windows XP. Is it a Giga issue or a SFP 3.1c issue?

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: beatpete on 2003-09-12 14:48 ]</font>
beatpete
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue May 01, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by beatpete »

anyone?
Post Reply