What is it Firewire?
hi Nestor,
an excerpt from the link below:
...Since 1,393 standards had already been considered, their efforts were called IEEE 1394. Several of the elders from the house of Apple preferred a less numeric name and called their version of IEEE 1394, FireWire.
here the details: http://www.vxm.com/21R.49.html
cheers, Tom
an excerpt from the link below:
...Since 1,393 standards had already been considered, their efforts were called IEEE 1394. Several of the elders from the house of Apple preferred a less numeric name and called their version of IEEE 1394, FireWire.
here the details: http://www.vxm.com/21R.49.html
cheers, Tom
- kensuguro
- Posts: 4434
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: BPM 60 to somewhere around 150
- Contact:
firewire audio devices (audio IO) are becoming more and more popular. Motu's got a few, believe the just released a new version of 828. Basically, what I think is cool about firewire is that notebooks have them. (atleast Mac Powerbooks do) and this means, you can have state of the art audio IO wherever you go. So, it's good for live performances, or on the spot recording (in the woods?) etc. I'm not sure what the true benefit would be on a desktop. The older 828 was good quality from my experience, and my video editing friend uses it on his desktop. So the quality is good. (don't have to worry too much)
Anyhow, the firewire audio IO trend shows that audio workstations are becoming more and more portable. That's a cool idea.
Anyhow, the firewire audio IO trend shows that audio workstations are becoming more and more portable. That's a cool idea.
Yes, that is good. What would be realy good would be, if Magma got some competition, so we can go CW portable a bit less expensive.
Information for new readers: A forum member named Braincell is known for spreading lies and malicious information without even knowing the basics of, what he is talking about. If noone responds to him, it is because he is ignored.
No, I'm not kiddingOn 2003-06-28 14:20, astroman wrote:
Spirit, you're kidding - it's built in every current camcorder and on all mobos
cheers, Tom

We must wait and see whether Firewire camcorders continue or if some manufacturers switch to USB2. This could be a real deadly blow to Firewire.
Also I must correct myself - Firewire is in fact *slower* than USB2.

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,844061,00.asp
Also this from PC Mag:
"USB 2.0 hard drives will continue to dominate the market, because FireWire is more expensive for PC manufacturers to implement. Most new desktop PC chipsets include integrated USB 2.0, making it essentially free. And soon all notebooks based on the Intel Centrino processor will have chipset support for USB 2.0. Meanwhile, many PCs still do not include FireWire ports, and FireWire is not fully integrated into any chipsets."
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Spirit on 2003-06-29 11:10 ]</font>
In theory yes, 480Mbit versus 400, but try and mount a Firewire/USB2 harddisk on the same system and benchmark it.On 2003-06-29 10:54, Spirit wrote:
Also I must correct myself - Firewire is in fact *slower* than USB2.![]()
My results: Firewire = 34MB/sec, USB2 = 16MB/sec .....
USB2 controller chips might be cheaper, but they also seem to be a lot slower.
Kim.
No Braincell, I won't pick up this ball 
but I can assure you that without Apple's propagation there wouldn't be any USB on PC mobos at all. The standard was widely rejected in the PC press as 'too old fashioned', 'too slow', etc when it was introduced
cheers, Tom
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: astroman on 2003-06-30 12:09 ]</font>

but I can assure you that without Apple's propagation there wouldn't be any USB on PC mobos at all. The standard was widely rejected in the PC press as 'too old fashioned', 'too slow', etc when it was introduced

cheers, Tom
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: astroman on 2003-06-30 12:09 ]</font>
dude, that 'loser technology' got a hell of a lot of recordings made while PCs were still struggling with this realtime music stuff.On 2003-06-30 10:35, braincell wrote:
Remember when Apples all had SCSI? It seems Apple always picks the loser technology.
get a perspective.
(and I'm not a mac user incidentally)

peace
- kensuguro
- Posts: 4434
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: BPM 60 to somewhere around 150
- Contact:
uh.. let's get on and forget the number war yeah?
Despite the speed issue and all, I capture DV with firewire, in fact, the program I'm working on uses live DV input from firewire. And there are also some other interesting audio devices for firewire.
Firewire's here right now, there are many devices built for firewire and they mostly work with good stability, as far as I know. I think that's all there is to it.
Despite the speed issue and all, I capture DV with firewire, in fact, the program I'm working on uses live DV input from firewire. And there are also some other interesting audio devices for firewire.
Firewire's here right now, there are many devices built for firewire and they mostly work with good stability, as far as I know. I think that's all there is to it.