Hard MOBO - RAM decision to be done, help me to chose one pl

Please remember the terms of your membership agreement.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
User avatar
Nestor
Posts: 6688
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Fourth Dimension Paradise, Cloud Nine!

Post by Nestor »

Not many of us go to the Tech Talk area, so I’m posting this question here for more people to read it. Anyway I’m going to continue writing in the already open thread there, were I’m asking help to build my new system.

I am between getting the P4G8X at $220 or the P4PE at $110, both from Asus.

The P4G8X allows for Dual-channel DDR technology doubling the bandwidth of your system to be used only with DDR266. The P4PE allows DDR 333 memory and hither DDR ram as well, with single memory technology.

The P4G8X handles DDR PC2700 • CL=2.5 • Unbuffered • ECC • 6ns • 2.5V • 64Meg x 72 while the P4PE only handles DDR PC2700 • CL=2.5 • Unbuffered • Non-parity • 6ns • 2.5V • 64Meg x 64

The P4G8X utilizes de E7205 new Intel Chipset, which is slightly faster than the 845PE utilized in the P4PE.

P4G8X is 100$ more expensive than the P4PE, does it worth the price? Which one would you choose from and why?

Thanks for your answers.


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: nestor on 2003-04-27 22:22 ]</font>
jupiter8
Posts: 448
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Sweden lives in Norway

Post by jupiter8 »

Well they are both pretty safe bets. I think you'd be very satisfied with either of them.

The E7205 chipset is slightly faster but newer which necessarily isn't a good thing.
The 845 chipset might have a slight edge on stability since it has been out longer. But i am talking very slight differences.

I would probably by the E7205 because i am a tech junkie!!!

But how do you rate value for money? It is twice as expensive but only marginaly faster.
On the other hand if you take the price for the whole system the difference isn't as big.

The wisest choice is the I845 but the world isn't ruled by wise people :smile:
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8454
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by astroman »

yeah, those 'slight differences' always make me laugh when I read the reviews in PC World.
The distance between the bright winner and a total looser is sometimes less than five percent. :lol:
User avatar
Nestor
Posts: 6688
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Fourth Dimension Paradise, Cloud Nine!

Post by Nestor »

Thanks guys for your answers.

I think that one of the most important points here, is whether the ECC handled by the P4G8X worth the effort, cos the P4PE has None Parity memory. The ECC, as I have read in many forums, gives a more accurate working to the whole system.

We know that the difference between the E7205 – 845 is almost imperceptible to the user, but what about stability? This is THE QUESTION here, if the P4G8X gives us truly a strong stability, I think I worth it. If you are talking exclusively about performance and fastness, I would not even think about it, I would go P4PE.
User avatar
alfonso
Posts: 2225
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Fregene.
Contact:

Post by alfonso »

AFAIK, ECC should be not recommended for Audio, as it's slower. I don't know how much...but this is what I hear.
User avatar
Nestor
Posts: 6688
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Fourth Dimension Paradise, Cloud Nine!

Post by Nestor »

Hi Alfonso, what’s up…

I’m rather surprised at this statement, I have read the opposite… could you please post the link or something to read about it? Cheers :smile:
User avatar
paulrmartin
Posts: 2445
Joined: Sun May 20, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by paulrmartin »

What does "None Parity memory" mean?
User avatar
Nestor
Posts: 6688
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Fourth Dimension Paradise, Cloud Nine!

Post by Nestor »

I only know practical things about this, first of all: you can't mix the two types. Keep it simple; count the chips on each module, if there are 9, it’s a “Parity one”, if there is less than 9, it’s a “Non Parity one”. Get more that are the same.

Here you have this text, from Kingston Technology:

Please explain ECC supporting vs. non-parity.
Parity is a form of error detection, which can detect memory errors and halt the system to prevent data corruption. The term Non-parity evolved to describe modules that did not have error detection capability. ECC (Error Correction Code) memory is a more complex form of error detection which not only detects, but also corrects most memory errors while your system is running. ECC supporting means the system is capable of supporting ECC memory, but can also run with non-parity modules.
User avatar
braincell
Posts: 5943
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Washington DC

Post by braincell »

I think it would be obvious by the name "error correction" that it would be slower. Did the price you quoted include shipping? It seems cheaper at http://www.mwave.com

4/29/03

BA19225 ASUS P4C800 DLX INTEL 875P CHIPSET ULTRA ATA100 ATX FORM FACTOR 1xAGP(PRO/8X)/5xPCI/4xDDR W/RAID,1394,USB 2.0 & AUDIO (CPU TYPE:INTEL PENTIUM 4 (800Mhz) - 478PIN) (*Limit 1pc/customer) $198.38

BA19151 ASUS P4G8X DLX INTEL E7205 CHIPSET ULTRA ATA133 ATX FORM FACTOR 1xAGP(8X/Pro)/5xPCI/4xDDR W/SATA,LAN(Gb),1394,USB 2.0 & AUDIO Detail Specs (CPU TYPE:INTEL PENTIUM 4 (533MHZ) - 478PIN) $190.80
Post Reply