96K SPdif destination modules

rafafredd · Post by **rafafredd** » Sun Sep 08, 2002 11:58 am

It seems that SPDif destination modules doesn´t works at 96Khz samplerate. Maybe this is happening because of the cables I´m using (analog audio cables). If anyone is using a 75 ohms cable (digital audio coaxial), let me know if the destination module works. By the way, I didn´t tried the source module.

Thanks

DJATWORK · Post by **DJATWORK** » Sun Sep 08, 2002 11:33 pm

Why are you talking about "modules"?

Your card works fine in 96Khz Sample rate?

Try the input, and tell what happens...

DJATWORK

Post by **garyb** » Mon Sep 09, 2002 10:41 am

if your card is slave,you may need the source module.....

rafafredd · Post by **rafafredd** » Mon Sep 09, 2002 2:02 pm

well, let me explain better.
I´m running both SFP 3.1c under XP and SFP 3.1a under 98SE. I have ROLAND DS-90a monitors and I´m using the SPDIF connection to feed them. The fact is that it works great with 44,100 or 48,000 Hz on both operating systems, but when I open the samplerate window and change to 96,000 Hz, the DS90a´s spdif light goes down and it stops to receive any signal. I´m using Belden high quality audio cables to do SPDIF connections and I cannot test SPDIF in because I don´t have any peripherals that outputs SPDIF. My LUNA is master(thats the only option in my case) and it works fine (except SPDIF) in 96K samplerate. So, If anyone have any idea...

Thanks!

[ This Message was edited by: rafafredd on 2002-09-09 15:04 ]

[ This Message was edited by: rafafredd on 2002-09-09 15:06 ]

[ This Message was edited by: rafafredd on 2002-09-09 15:07 ]

marcuspocus · Post by **marcuspocus** » Mon Sep 09, 2002 2:07 pm

Well, i think that your roland ds90 don't accept 96khz as input, read your manual, and confirm.

rafafredd · Post by **rafafredd** » Mon Sep 09, 2002 2:18 pm

well, you are right!!! It accepts 55K maximum. I was so certain that it worked at 96K that I didn´t checked it out. Sorry for the waste of time...

DJATWORK · Post by **DJATWORK** » Mon Sep 09, 2002 8:46 pm

Are you shure that the Rolands DA is better than the CW DA?

CW has the better specifications that I had ever seen in AD/DA...

DJATWORK