Process priority in Windows XP

An area for people to discuss Scope related problems, issues, etc.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
devo
Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by devo »

I just learned something that I thought I would share with you all - I don't know if it useful in solving SFP problems. Maybe this is something you all know about, but I guess its better to hear it twice than not at all.

A friend of mine upgraded Cubase SX to 1.02 and that caused severe timing problems. It turns out the Cubase application process wasn't started with the correct priority (it was Normal instead of High). Using the Task Manager we changed the priority and suddenly it was back to super timing - we stressed the machine to use all CPU without any timing problems whatsoever in Cubase SX.

When I went back to my own system I saw that the SFP process was also running at Normal priority. Now, I don't have any current issues with performance, so I can't really tell if it makes a difference. But I though that anyone that might have problems with timing, latency or whatever (especially in conjunction with other activities on the machine) might just want to try raising the priority.

Just thought I would mention that.
cook
Posts: 135
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: travelling

Post by cook »

Thanks man, I didn't know that!!
Music Manic
Posts: 1743
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by Music Manic »

Yep we will be able to control things down to threading with XP eventually.
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

There's already options for that in Cubase, isn't it? See Cubase SX ->Devices ->Device Setup ->VST Multitrack ->Expert. Also Cubase 5.x implemented this option.

It's set to High priority in my Cubase, also showing 'High' in XP Task Manager.
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
Post Reply