Very Mixer old mixer from Version 3
Very Mixer old mixer from Version 3
I remember the old Crew Version 3 mixer, does anyone still have the device? I liked it very much. Can somebody send it?


Re: Very Mixer old mixer from Version 3
the Bug mixer?
Re: Very Mixer old mixer from Version 3
The biggest one


Re: Very Mixer old mixer from Version 3
blue, called "big mixer"?
there's a reason that mixer isn't in Scope anymore. it had some serious phase issues. that's how the "big mixer" became the "bug mixer".
there's a reason that mixer isn't in Scope anymore. it had some serious phase issues. that's how the "big mixer" became the "bug mixer".
Re: Very Mixer old mixer from Version 3
Okay,in this case my interest is gone. THX Gary


Re: Very Mixer old mixer from Version 3
wet blanket, me... 

Re: Very Mixer old mixer from Version 3
I believe SpaceF has some interesting mixers...
-
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:55 am
Re: Very Mixer old mixer from Version 3
Shame on me, but I love big mixer. It gives a clean overview and it allows to modify the eq within the main window.
The later mixers are nice, but I miss the simplicity and overview of big mixer.
For this reason, I'm very happy, that it still runs on V7.
The later mixers are nice, but I miss the simplicity and overview of big mixer.
For this reason, I'm very happy, that it still runs on V7.
\\\ *** l 0 v e | X I T E *** ///
Re: Very Mixer old mixer from Version 3
So what you are after is the ease of use of being able to see General channel strip settings in one glance across the mixer like many current DAWs offer. I do like seeing my ra curves for the stock EQ in logic at the top of each channel for instance, so I understand this. I was going to suggest That the STM mixers also have built in functionality like the Bigmixer but with phase lock functionality in the mixer, until I read the above post and realized Ed this is related to the following discussion: viewtopic.php?t=35401
GaryB, this may be worth passing by CW. A few tweaks to the STM GUI would address this stuff ( realizing of course that this simply puts another item on holger’s to do list ).
GaryB, this may be worth passing by CW. A few tweaks to the STM GUI would address this stuff ( realizing of course that this simply puts another item on holger’s to do list ).
Re: Very Mixer old mixer from Version 3
yes, this would not be a pressing matter at this time.
the big mixer did have a nice layout. if you like it, use it. now we know who has a copy.
perhaps someone with the SDK could modify the big mixer. i believe the v3 brought the STM series, so it was in v1 and 2.
the big mixer did have a nice layout. if you like it, use it. now we know who has a copy.
perhaps someone with the SDK could modify the big mixer. i believe the v3 brought the STM series, so it was in v1 and 2.
Re: Very Mixer old mixer from Version 3
Nebel I am absolut with you!nebelfuerst wrote: Sat Jun 30, 2018 12:24 pm Shame on me, but I love big mixer. It gives a clean overview and it allows to modify the eq within the main window.
The later mixers are nice, but I miss the simplicity and overview of big mixer.
For this reason, I'm very happy, that it still runs on V7.


Re: Very Mixer old mixer from Version 3
Found it, thanks nebelfuerst. Attached a screenshot so we can see what the UI fuss is all about & Marco has what he wanted.
I do think that I would still prefer STM, but I'm open to hearing a comparison of what this offers versus that based on what we can now see. I also suggest referring to SpaceF's mixers here: http://spacef-devices.com/
I do think that I would still prefer STM, but I'm open to hearing a comparison of what this offers versus that based on what we can now see. I also suggest referring to SpaceF's mixers here: http://spacef-devices.com/
- Attachments
-
- bigmixer.jpg (291.88 KiB) Viewed 4006 times
Re: Very Mixer old mixer from Version 3



Re: Very Mixer old mixer from Version 3
The channel layout in Big Mixer was great - and I never had any sonic issues with the Big mixer. But the fact of having to switch between 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16 is why I eventually stopped using it.