It will appear at Winter NAMM ...
Price is EUR 1.899,-
https://www.soundonsound.com/news/waldo ... ll-it-kyra
I imagine it being in my rack together w/ XITE-1 and J.B. Solaris 1HU rackmount unit.

Bud
All demos from Musikmesse are prototype.dawman wrote: Sat Jun 09, 2018 4:19 pm
Didn’t hear their Filters, so I’m assuming they’re not being highlighted for a reason.
Usually you show a synths strengths in a demo.
I use the HX-3 FPGA Module for my Hammond B3/Leslie 122 emulation. It’s pretty bad ass.spacef wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 6:44 am The more I read abour FPGA, the more I think that Scope/Xite itself is a kind of FPGA.... (it can be programmed to do different stuff, every user has a different setup, default config has to be loaded on start etc etc....). Of course I understand it is not the same, but the Scope system seems to have many advantages of the FGPA, eventhough it runs on many DSPs.
Of course, I am not qualified to make a comparison of features between DSP and FPGA, and what I just said is poetry rather than technicalities.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUsHwi4M4xE
Since I read this already posted @KC https://www.computerworld.com/article/3 ... ow-it.html , I wonder how I´ll deal w/ software in future and will try minimizing software usage, than buy more hardware again.dawman wrote: Fri Aug 03, 2018 6:23 am
Another 8 part hardware synth as I grow weary with Microsoft and Apple synths.
For the money, it will be good for many, many useful patches IMO,- and I doubt filters will sound unacceptable.
Since I´ve seen the "black" version and read every single voice is able to access different filter types, I have GAS !
I am getting into hardware now. I like the new analogue/digital hybrids such as the Prophet X. Hardware is a lot better than it used to be (in some cases). I would hate to add up all the money I've spent on software over the years. Don't get me wrong, I will still be using a lot of software because I could not afford to replace it with hardware and also some software does some things that hardware can't do. A few developers are getting creative rather than just copying hardware all the time. Seuomorphism is still going strong though.dawman wrote: Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:01 am The fake synths are what need bigger faster CPUs and still don’t get hardware quality sound.
Cheers
dawman wrote: Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:01 am
My PCs will just become hardware boxes with software samplers.
I have extra CPUs motherboards RAM and SSDs laying around too. All H/Z97 i7 5775C and DDR3.
All more than enough to handle samplers.
truedawman wrote: Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:01 am The fake synths are what need bigger faster CPUs and still don’t get hardware quality sound.
Do you really need all the different filter types and does it make sense in a 8-voice synth ?dawman wrote: Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:01 am The Code 8 OD in a dual 4 voice voice easily smokes Omnisphere and Zebra.
I got 40 Filters too. 8 of each, Roland, ARP, SEM, Moog and CS80.
Good to know you like ´em (more) now.dawman wrote: Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:01 am I actually like Valkyries digital filters, actually heard them modulated by LFO in other demos.
Hmm, SCOPE synths to my ears, sound in most cases better than native.
I´ll definitely try to find a balance.dawman wrote: Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:01 am Maybe as I get older and whinier about dragging around racks I’ll use soft everything.
There´s the danger when deciding for hardware 100%,- we´ll collect hardware keybds and rack-modules again like we did from mid 70s ´til Y2K.dawman wrote: Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:01 am But as long as I still have balls my sound must also have balls.
Great to read they work well for you.dawman wrote: Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:01 am Thanks for steering towards the TT08As.
...
These 8 inch cabinets are just insanely powerful and thick.