Pulsar2 works with overlocked intel P4 2.5G to 2.8G?

PC Configurations, motherboards, etc, etc

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
Guest

Post by Guest »

as the topic!
thankz!
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

Should work fine:
-if OC'ed by multiplier, FSB remains the same so no problem whatsoever for pci cards.
-if OC'ed by raising FSB, pci bus would go 33-> 37MHz which is still within Pulsar's specs.
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
User avatar
Neutron
Posts: 2274
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Great white north eh
Contact:

Post by Neutron »

Asus and Abit intel chipset p4 motherboards allow overclocking the FSB while locking the PCI and AGP bus to the proper speed.
MeloManiac
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by MeloManiac »

... as do SiS chipsets:) Running on an MSI 645DX motherboard with Pulsar, works fine. P4 1.6@2.16
MeloManiac
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by MeloManiac »

... as do SiS chipsets:) Running on an MSI 645DX motherboard with Pulsar, works fine. P4 1.6@2.16
Music Manic
Posts: 1743
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by Music Manic »

What does FSB benefit,or what is its actual function?
Thx!
Micha
Posts: 471
Joined: Tue May 08, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Berlin
Contact:

Post by Micha »

FSB is the bus between CPU and memory. The faster it is, the quicker the results are pushed back form the CPU to the memory and vice versa. It is not necessary to have the same speed as the CPU. For a normal operation the CPU uses 3 or more cycles. So a ratio of 1:4 is pretty good, like a Northwood 2.x with 533 RDRAM. So there are not too many waiting cycles. But the effect is not so dramatic, compared to 266 DDR, ratio 1:8, it is about 12% (from german mag c/t).
Happy pulsaring
Micha
DJATWORK
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Argentina
Contact:

Post by DJATWORK »

I can´t leave this thread wuthout asking...
you really need that "extra power", even taking the risk of not being shure about stability?

DJATWORK
Luis Maria Gonzalez Lentijo
DjatWork! Optimizaciones
Buenos Aires
Argentina
marcuspocus
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Canada/France

Post by marcuspocus »

I'm thinking the same thing here... Why risk stability for a couple more cycles? I donno, maybe you need this small little extra to just sqeeze another vsti into the mix?

I know that i will never over'clock my daw, maybe a game machine that's already too slow for a particular game, then even... well, that was my tought, anyway, it's up to you!

:smile:
Post Reply