scope pci cards AD/DA converters quality

A place to talk about whatever Scope music/gear related stuff you want.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
User avatar
ARCADIOS
Posts: 1358
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Glyfada, Athens-Greece
Contact:

scope pci cards AD/DA converters quality

Post by ARCADIOS »

How good are they?
In my ears they are good, but I haven't compared directly to another configuration, so I would be very interested in knowing
the difference in quality among 1.scope's pci cards, 2.xite, 3.A16, 4.ferofish, or other....
timstoel
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 1:26 pm

Re: scope pci cards AD/DA converters quality

Post by timstoel »

They are far superior to, say, a Focusrite Pro 40, which at the moment I use as a A/D converter on one ADAT input. The rear XLR inputs on Xite sound very good when I use them with high end outboard gear, and they actually allow for +4dB or more on input before clipping. The Xite will not get in your way of making good tracks, but I would like to A/B it against a lavry or Cranesong A/D and D/A.

Tim
djmicron
Posts: 1181
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Milano

Re: scope pci cards AD/DA converters quality

Post by djmicron »

the xite on board converters are very good, noise is difficult to be perceived even on the headphone.
The converters on pci cards are good too, still better than many of the middle range firewire cards available today.
If you don't need 16 AD/DA channels, you can invest in a good 2 channels AES/EBU converter, but it depends on what is your aim, because especially with the xite, there isn't so much difference.
User avatar
dante
Posts: 5044
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia
Contact:

Re: scope pci cards AD/DA converters quality

Post by dante »

Theres a brief mention re the A16 v Ferrofish converters here :

http://www.hitfoundry.com/issue_10/fsh_mast.htm

They both use AKM converters, but the Ferrofish uses a newer version.
Post Reply