Network Cards and Pulsar
DUMP THE REALTEK CARD!!!!!
I have known it to cause instabilities, it is the worst network card money can buy in my opinion. Lets say for the sake of argument you do get it to be stable, that doesn't change the fact that its pci latency seesm to be fixed at 128 clocks, this absolutely hogs the pci bus, robbing the pulsar card of performance, and casues small glitches in sound.
I have known it to cause instabilities, it is the worst network card money can buy in my opinion. Lets say for the sake of argument you do get it to be stable, that doesn't change the fact that its pci latency seesm to be fixed at 128 clocks, this absolutely hogs the pci bus, robbing the pulsar card of performance, and casues small glitches in sound.
Add life to your days, not days to your life.
Haven't really found any problems with the Realtek yet. Got a D-Link too, is that a better card? Any other cards you can advise?
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
The cheap d-link cards use the same realtek chipset, and have the same pci latency issue, its less of an issue on intel make chipsets, but still not the best card to have, just simply becuase you get what you pay for. I've seen these cards retailing for 15 euros.
I would recommend an intel network card, 3com are a good name also, but I've not tested it. I'm using a netgear at the moment its given me no problems, slight increase in network performance, although check compatibility with your motherboard, netgear doesn't get along with some via motherboards.
I would recommend an intel network card, 3com are a good name also, but I've not tested it. I'm using a netgear at the moment its given me no problems, slight increase in network performance, although check compatibility with your motherboard, netgear doesn't get along with some via motherboards.
Add life to your days, not days to your life.
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Contact:
I got a Netgear USB to overcome the Realtek thing a while back but could never get it working. It installs ok and works sometimes but its really not useable as it drops out all the time and sometimes doesnt even work at all. Tried it on a CUSL2 and BH6....
I will go an Intel NIC i think. Thanks for the help...
I will go an Intel NIC i think. Thanks for the help...
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Contact:
I replaced my D-Link NIC with a D-Link USB 100/10 network and it works awesome! Since I need USB for Logic's XSKey, I might as well use the other for something - a network! That also allowed me to take the NIC off my board entirely, freeing a PCI resource and lessen my resrouce shares! It works as well as the NIC though conforming down to USB's bottle neck of 11Mbits/sec, but that's quite alright! Also, my box seem to be running a lot better! My only regret is that I should have done this in the first place and saved meself some headaches!
Also, I was advised that the CUBX board doesn't handle USB that well, but for my experience, It's humming along VERY well! Perhaps due to the latest MOBO BIOS? Actually, the CUBX doens't really have a good grasp on the on-board ATA66 - not a lot of difference from the regualr IDE controller.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: The Z Station on 2002-05-23 10:11 ]</font>
Also, I was advised that the CUBX board doesn't handle USB that well, but for my experience, It's humming along VERY well! Perhaps due to the latest MOBO BIOS? Actually, the CUBX doens't really have a good grasp on the on-board ATA66 - not a lot of difference from the regualr IDE controller.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: The Z Station on 2002-05-23 10:11 ]</font>
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Contact:
Hmmm, interesting, my D-Link USB network port is running like a champ! Netgear should probably work better?! Could it be a faulty devise? I couldn't be happier "De-linking" my D-Link NIC! This USB network is quite the work horse! Although it conforms down to the USB bottleneck of 11Mb/sec, XP Pro is still showing a connection of 100Mb/sec. and the performance is equally as good as the NIC! Haven't experience any drops at all!On 2002-05-23 07:49, Rattler wrote:
I got a Netgear USB to overcome the Realtek thing a while back but could never get it working. It installs ok and works sometimes but its really not useable as it drops out all the time and sometimes doesnt even work at all. Tried it on a CUSL2 and BH6....
I will go an Intel NIC i think. Thanks for the help...
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: The Z Station on 2002-05-26 17:29 ]</font>
<i>SFP works fine but i can load "only" 6 MV´s.</i>
On CUSL/TUSL2, 12 should be the maximum if you have it setup correct with a make2 board (pulsar2,luna2,etc) as the main board handling the PCI. So perhaps it's doing more than you suspect.
More information on NICs:
http://www.dslwebserver.com/main/nictest.html - 3com makes the fastest cards, the 905 series, which aren't in this roundup.
http://www.dslwebserver.com/main/nictest-usb.html - USB network roundup - check out that performance
http://www6.tomshardware.com/network/01 ... index.html - includes a wider range of 3com cards and the Intel as well. I have the 3com SOHO card mainly because of the lower CPu utilization...
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: subhuman on 2002-05-29 09:57 ]</font>
On CUSL/TUSL2, 12 should be the maximum if you have it setup correct with a make2 board (pulsar2,luna2,etc) as the main board handling the PCI. So perhaps it's doing more than you suspect.
More information on NICs:
http://www.dslwebserver.com/main/nictest.html - 3com makes the fastest cards, the 905 series, which aren't in this roundup.
http://www.dslwebserver.com/main/nictest-usb.html - USB network roundup - check out that performance

http://www6.tomshardware.com/network/01 ... index.html - includes a wider range of 3com cards and the Intel as well. I have the 3com SOHO card mainly because of the lower CPu utilization...
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: subhuman on 2002-05-29 09:57 ]</font>