Detailed tech spec for xite-1 and xite-1d

[Liquid EDGE]

Is there a Detailed tech spec for xite-1 and xite-1d around anywhere?
Full on details of converters internal word length blah blah blah.

[Liquid EDGE]

Including. Thd figures. Snr figures. Dynamic range of converters. Etc etc.

[dante]

http://sonic-core.net/joomla.soniccore/ ... 22&lang=us

Click the 'FEATURES' tab when u get there.

Internal word length > 80 bits.

Cant see Snr, Thd.

[Liquid EDGE]

Cheers Dante. Yeah I did see that. Was hoping to find a more in-depth and detailed list and figures. I'm guessing the test thing in the recording mag has all the detail but it's in German.

[petal]

Google translate of the last few paragraphs that seem to have the details you are looking for - better than nothing?

We will not ignore the Audio transducer functions of the Scope Xite-1 can. Passes through the obstacle course of measurements it with excellent Music, making it not only from the Equipment, but also technically enqueues measured in the upper class. The Noisefl oor in the FFT spectrum is excellent -100 decibels. Debt and noise to the distances Microphone inputs with measured 79.9 and 82.5 decibels very well.
THD + N is 0.01 percent and is over the entire frequency range constant. The same is true for the Common mode rejection, the only -70 dB in the bass achieved in the relevant field but at great
-80 Decibels. The nonlinearity is this in every way. To -108 decibels is completely linear trajectory, a
very good behavior. When measuring the Latency-enabled Fusion software shows a superb turn
Value of one millisecond between Xite-1 and PC. In VSTIM added this value to the Cubase Device Manager correctly displayed latency be what is simply excellent.
Even the sound is sort audio section of the Scope Xite-1 in the upper class. Signals, it accurately captures and solves it in detail on the top. A Wins special award for neutrality, however. Compared to our
Reference Lynx Aurora 8/Lake People micamp F355, but also the teutonischnüchternen RME Fireface 400 have the Xite-1 images have a noticeable emphasis on the lower middle range, the signals sounded pleasantly soft. At the same time the sound levels in somewhat more restrained, making a total to
argues that the Xite-1-shots superficial, bulky and not so therefore come as vividly in our Reference. But that's not a flaw, but rather a question of taste and many are Recordler the Xite-1 precisely because of these characteristics. estimate For as Ohrenschmeichler the Scope Xite-1 has no doubt his qualities.
Conclusion: The glory and the benefits of Creamware Scope DSP cards celebrate the Xite-1 is more than just a glorious resurrection. Sonic Core raises the Scope Xite-1 is the combination of DSPPlattform and audio interface to a new level of performance and success heralds a new generation of modernized recipe for success.

[Liquid EDGE]

Thanks. Why did I not think of google translate.
They really should get sound on sound to do a review of the xite-1.

Cheers petal.

[dante]

http://www.soundonsound.com/news?NewsID=13130
http://www.soundonsound.com/news?NewsID=13445

More announcements than full review though...

[Immanuel]

Translated from one of the German tests:
Mic input sensitivity [dBu] -63,8/∞
Line input sensitivity [dBu] -44,2/∞
Instr input sensitivity [dBu] -63,8/∞
max input mic/line/instr [dBu] ∞
max output [dBu] 21,1
Geräuschspannungsabstand (signal:noise ratio) Noise floor? [dB] 82,5 (Mic/Instr.)
Geräuschspannungsabstand (signal:noise ratio) Noise floor? [dB] 88,3 (Line)
Fremdspannungsabstand (signal:noise ratio) [dB] 79,9 (Mic/Instr.)
Fremdspannungsabstand (signal:noise ratio) [dB] 84,4 (Line)
Verzerrungen über Frequenz = THD? max. % 0,01

() marks my translation of google translate's attempt to translate
? marks my guesses