can someone (please) test the spdif (IN) module, I cant get any signal at 44.1k
32k 48k are all fine as soon as I switch to 44.1k the signal vanishes.
I have the exact same routing and config as in 3.01 . so the only thing that has changed is 3.1 update.
consequently I reinstalled 3.01 alongside 3.1
and all still works in 3.01, so it doesnt seem to be a driver issue.
routing>
(pc2)egosys wt2496 spdif out into(pc1) pulsar2 spdif, back into (pc2)
korg 168 on adat(a)in+out of pulsar.
system:
windows xp pro
pulsar 2 x 2
asus a7m266
512ddr
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: topaz on 2002-05-10 19:15 ]</font>
SFP 3.1 spdif input at 44.1k cant get a signal ?
I do not have the SFP up and running yet, but I have a tip for you 
You can rename this thread (click to edit the initial post) into something like: "will someone please send me their spdif" That might make someone look at the trhead, who otherwice would not?
Immanuel
You can rename this thread (click to edit the initial post) into something like: "will someone please send me their spdif" That might make someone look at the trhead, who otherwice would not?
Immanuel
Information for new readers: A forum member named Braincell is known for spreading lies and malicious information without even knowing the basics of, what he is talking about. If noone responds to him, it is because he is ignored.
why does the thread need renaming?
it,s quite clear what the problem is .
it,s quite clear what the problem is .
On 2002-05-10 03:17, Immanuel wrote:
I do not have the SFP up and running yet, but I have a tip for you
You can rename this thread (click to edit the initial post) into something like: "will someone please send me their spdif" That might make someone look at the trhead, who otherwice would not?
Immanuel
i can give you an 'answer', but don't know if you'll like it.
rightclicking the S/PDIF module doesn't give you the option to select 44.1Khz (at least on muy set up: macG3) and the manual says NOTHING about sample rate. mmm.
sorry to have not been of any help. haven't used S/PDIF even once.
rightclicking the S/PDIF module doesn't give you the option to select 44.1Khz (at least on muy set up: macG3) and the manual says NOTHING about sample rate. mmm.
sorry to have not been of any help. haven't used S/PDIF even once.
andy
the lunatics are in the hall
the lunatics are in the hall
still waiting for a confirmation, for me 3.1 is unusable till then, bahhh.
On 2002-05-10 03:32, borg wrote:
i can give you an 'answer', but don't know if you'll like it.
rightclicking the S/PDIF module doesn't give you the option to select 44.1Khz (at least on muy set up: macG3) and the manual says NOTHING about sample rate. mmm.
sorry to have not been of any help. haven't used S/PDIF even once.
-
groovemaker
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2001 4:00 pm
ahh thanks for replying man, ;
you are the first to.. yes imo spdif is broken in 3.1 and a hot fix is needed, I can see many dont use it but I sure do and without it 3.1 is redundant .. (for me)
thanks again for the confirmation.
you are the first to.. yes imo spdif is broken in 3.1 and a hot fix is needed, I can see many dont use it but I sure do and without it 3.1 is redundant .. (for me)
thanks again for the confirmation.
On 2002-05-10 03:45, groovemaker wrote:
I have the same Problem with the spdif module. I hear a strange noise when i use the 44.1 khz spdif module. I don't know what it is but it seems to be a bug from the new software. I hope they will fix this soon.
coaxal spdif in @ 44.1
On 2002-05-10 04:19, darolek wrote:When you write "spdif (in)" that you mean 'Pulsar SPDIF Source' ?On 2002-05-09 16:25, topaz wrote:
can someone (please) test the spdif (in) module, I cant get any signal @44.1
other sample rates are ok..
If yes, I can't confirm that "bug".
p.s.
Have you used optical or coaxial SPDIF connection ?
Hi, nothing has changed from 3.01 wich works fine.
no im not slaving to spdif im just running in from a 2nd pc, pulsar is master as always
pc2 > pulsar in spdif
adat a > pulsar in
pulsar as master.
no im not slaving to spdif im just running in from a 2nd pc, pulsar is master as always
pc2 > pulsar in spdif
adat a > pulsar in
pulsar as master.
On 2002-05-10 04:50, darolek wrote:Always check your settings in 'Samplerate' box. To get wordclock from coaxial IN you must set up 'Slave' + 'SPDIF as SyncSource' + 'opt.ADAT as hardw.Source'. I hope it will help.On 2002-05-10 04:23, topaz wrote:
coaxal spdif in @ 44.1
Topaz:
"why does the thread need renaming?
it,s quite clear what the problem is ."
It is my experience from visitting a lot of messageboards, that the more specific a title, the more shure can a person be, that the right people answer.
I think the old name was as informative as:
"Problem with spdif in"
(I know that was not the exact fracing).
That can be anything, that has to do with spdif in. And people not having problems with it might very well not look there (some helpfull soles yes - but far from all).
It seamed, you wanted a copy of a working module. Now that is very easy to provide for a person using the spdif. Sp maybe someone, who had no urge to look at the problem would from the title see, that this would be an easy 15seconds problem solving (just mailing it to you. It is often like that on the internet - many very effective people, that do not want to spend too much time fixing other peoples stuff, but if it is easy they might very well do.
Maybe it is a bit different here, but I only wanted to help the best I could, as you seamed frustrated.
Immanuel
"why does the thread need renaming?
it,s quite clear what the problem is ."
It is my experience from visitting a lot of messageboards, that the more specific a title, the more shure can a person be, that the right people answer.
I think the old name was as informative as:
"Problem with spdif in"
(I know that was not the exact fracing).
That can be anything, that has to do with spdif in. And people not having problems with it might very well not look there (some helpfull soles yes - but far from all).
It seamed, you wanted a copy of a working module. Now that is very easy to provide for a person using the spdif. Sp maybe someone, who had no urge to look at the problem would from the title see, that this would be an easy 15seconds problem solving (just mailing it to you. It is often like that on the internet - many very effective people, that do not want to spend too much time fixing other peoples stuff, but if it is easy they might very well do.
Maybe it is a bit different here, but I only wanted to help the best I could, as you seamed frustrated.
Immanuel
Information for new readers: A forum member named Braincell is known for spreading lies and malicious information without even knowing the basics of, what he is talking about. If noone responds to him, it is because he is ignored.
sorry im slightly confused immanuel
the topic says spdif in @ 44.1 broken ?
doesnt this asume it is a bug and I want users to clarify this ? ..
I dont need anyone to send me there spdif modules, that wont do any good if it is a 3.1 bug? and thats what im trying to find out.
the topic says spdif in @ 44.1 broken ?
doesnt this asume it is a bug and I want users to clarify this ? ..
I dont need anyone to send me there spdif modules, that wont do any good if it is a 3.1 bug? and thats what im trying to find out.
On 2002-05-10 05:22, Immanuel wrote:
Topaz:
"why does the thread need renaming?
it,s quite clear what the problem is ."
It is my experience from visitting a lot of messageboards, that the more specific a title, the more shure can a person be, that the right people answer.
I think the old name was as informative as:
"Problem with spdif in"
(I know that was not the exact fracing).
That can be anything, that has to do with spdif in. And people not having problems with it might very well not look there (some helpfull soles yes - but far from all).
It seamed, you wanted a copy of a working module. Now that is very easy to provide for a person using the spdif. Sp maybe someone, who had no urge to look at the problem would from the title see, that this would be an easy 15seconds problem solving (just mailing it to you. It is often like that on the internet - many very effective people, that do not want to spend too much time fixing other peoples stuff, but if it is easy they might very well do.
Maybe it is a bit different here, but I only wanted to help the best I could, as you seamed frustrated.
Immanuel
