
cheers, Tom
The plural of anecdote is NOT 'data', it's anecdotes.braincell wrote:but the overwhelming majority of scientist think global warming is a grave concern.
valis wrote:The plural of anecdote is NOT 'data', it's anecdotes.braincell wrote:but the overwhelming majority of scientist think global warming is a grave concern.
a dutch ministers reasoning was this:braincell wrote:This debate could go on forever. The public is not decided but the overwhelming majority of scientist think global warming is a grave concern. I'm not going to put much stock in the opinion of laymen such as you over highly educated professionals.
Debating is pointless since we are no experts. IMHO the best thing we can do is discuss these things and tune our perspectives.braincell wrote:This debate could go on forever.
FrancisHarmany wrote:Debating is pointless since we are no experts. IMHO the best thing we can do is discuss these things and tune our perspectives.braincell wrote:This debate could go on forever.
My guess was that before they GMO'ed the Elites they farted non stop.garyb wrote:FrancisHarmany wrote:Debating is pointless since we are no experts. IMHO the best thing we can do is discuss these things and tune our perspectives.braincell wrote:This debate could go on forever.
actually, it's simpler than that, and it's not that hard to be an "expert". many of these "experts" have done little or no actual investigation themselves. look, the data is real or not, and in this case, the data is admittedly phony. there really isn't any "debate'", except in the minds of those who haven't done any actual investigation. the only debate is over who will get lucrative grants and other funding.
again, if man-made "greenhouse gasses" are the cause of "climate change", then explain the midieval warm period and the "little ice age" that followed in that context. where were the greedy midddleclass and their suvs then?
FrancisHarmany wrote:My guess was that before they GMO'ed the Elites they farted non stop.
Even if they are the same thing?braincell wrote:I will gladly side with the elites over the god fearing inbreds![]()
![]()
.
That's obvious.braincell wrote:That's your perspective. I don't think they are the same thing at all.
Awwww how cute, braincell needs to be part of something to feel whole.braincell wrote:I will gladly side with the elites over the god fearing inbreds![]()
![]()
.
Past climate changes can be measured in several ways. Such measurements concur with each other which is why we think they are accurate. Climate shifts take place over thousands of years not hundreds of years!!!garyb wrote: oh and btw-there's still no possible response to the smoking gun on the co2 fakery, or a proper explanation of the midieval warm period or the little ice age following, assuming that there ever was something like "stable climate".
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www. ... RFLNLo3goAgaryb wrote:yes, they call themselves the best. of course, according to braincell, the thing to be most feared is an "inbred". how amusing it is that the most inbred humans on the face of the earth(they even write whole books detailing every inbred family line possible to prove it, because they're just that proud of it), are the "elite". the only thing elite about such people is that they are few in number.