Poll for re-enabling the Pulsar Geekdom Levels

Please remember the terms of your membership agreement.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Do we want to have Pulsar Geekdom Levels (ak.a. Ranking Scheme) back?

Yes - The old Ranking Scheme
5
36%
Yes - Create a new Ranking Scheme
3
21%
No - I don't want to be ranked (and it's childish anyway)
1
7%
I don't care
5
36%
 
Total votes: 14

User avatar
pollux
Posts: 503
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: France

Re: Poll for re-enabling the Pulsar Geekdom Levels

Post by pollux »

stardust wrote:So I really need to change the avatar if this is the association. :cry:
You can take a pic of the Stardust casino in Vegas (which is dust by now) :lol:
User avatar
Shroomz~>
Posts: 5669
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: The Blue Shadows

Re: Poll for re-enabling the Pulsar Geekdom Levels

Post by Shroomz~> »

kylie wrote:ps: and don't come up with things like "firebreathing can raise your insurance rates since your property is at higher risk of being burned by accident now"... :D
As if I would come up with something like that. :D
User avatar
kylie
Rank-o-phile
Posts: 2130
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Dresden / Germany

Re: Poll for re-enabling the Pulsar Geekdom Levels

Post by kylie »

Shroomz~> wrote:
kylie wrote:ps: and don't come up with things like "firebreathing can raise your insurance rates since your property is at higher risk of being burned by accident now"... :D
As if I would come up with something like that. :D
why should I trust you on that matter? we're in the off-topic forum, so anything can happen :wink:

-greetings, markus-

ps. it's your furniture anyway. I for one (provided the old ranking system was re-enabled) still have to go miles from being a pathetic guru to overlord... :D
--
I'm sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.
User avatar
John Cooper
Moderator
Posts: 1182
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Planet Z
Contact:

Re: Poll for re-enabling the Pulsar Geekdom Levels

Post by John Cooper »

stardust wrote:I remember John saying that he stopped to re-implement the ranks because the original idea got obsolete by the sheer number of posts.
Recall that the highest rank was 2000 posts firebreathing levitating ..... ;)
And only a few members could reach this number of posts after a couple of years.
Nowadays there are 18 in that post range for the 'overlords'......

IMHO this points to waynes remark:


It is NOT posts that count.
It is the content, the help, the spirit.

There is no metric that measures that, but individual appreciation in the forum.

But Markus point was the fun of having ranks with creative names like many other boards.
hey lets not take ranks and posts too serious ;)

The quality of Z is in the helpful spirit, the community, self moderation and variety, not in the bragging, patronizing and showboating.
Yes, my thoughts exactly...
IOW, I'm not that interested in adding rankings, but if there's an overwhelming demand for them, we can do it. So far, the poll response is not exactly overwhelming :)

-John
User avatar
kylie
Rank-o-phile
Posts: 2130
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Dresden / Germany

Re: Poll for re-enabling the Pulsar Geekdom Levels

Post by kylie »

John Cooper wrote:IOW, I'm not that interested in adding rankings, but if there's an overwhelming demand for them, we can do it. So far, the poll response is not exactly overwhelming :)
that's what I started the poll for: to see if there is public demand for it or not. as I said, I will accept the vote of the majority.
so far there is at least no negative vote, thus I'll give that another 2 weeks, and if it will remain a wish of a minority, I'll resign :cry:
--
I'm sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.
Post Reply