The Pope arrives in Washington
-
BingoTheClowno
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
first, talking with y'all and engaging every one that i can..
second, remaining as independant and free thinking as possible.
third, keeping informed.
fourth, complaining to power, letting them know that i'm not down.
fifth,.............(i'm not detailing any further than that)
............
.........
...........
..............
last, encouraging you to do something, anything as well. at the very least, i'm not going down willingly.
i'm not here to tell you what to do, you need to figure that out yourself. i'm no hero, nor do i have all the answers(phew!
)
second, remaining as independant and free thinking as possible.
third, keeping informed.
fourth, complaining to power, letting them know that i'm not down.
fifth,.............(i'm not detailing any further than that)
............
.........
...........
..............
last, encouraging you to do something, anything as well. at the very least, i'm not going down willingly.
i'm not here to tell you what to do, you need to figure that out yourself. i'm no hero, nor do i have all the answers(phew!
)
extremely important but insignificant issues?
sublime?
what are you trying to say?
important is by definition significant. what you wrote is rather orwellian. this is a good example of doublethink.
you are the only one who can do anything! first you must find the real world!
sublime means "characterized by nobility; grand; majestic" and "of a high spiritual, moral or intellectual worth." and "not to be excelled; supreme".
while i thank you for the complement, i still have the feeling that we are not communicating well due to the language barrier.
last, please stop using that inane "conspiracy theory" catch-phrase. it is used to lump things that are true and things that are not true into one big pot of unimportance. the true things are FACT not THEORY and deserve their proper due.
sublime?
what are you trying to say?
important is by definition significant. what you wrote is rather orwellian. this is a good example of doublethink.
you are the only one who can do anything! first you must find the real world!
sublime means "characterized by nobility; grand; majestic" and "of a high spiritual, moral or intellectual worth." and "not to be excelled; supreme".
while i thank you for the complement, i still have the feeling that we are not communicating well due to the language barrier.
last, please stop using that inane "conspiracy theory" catch-phrase. it is used to lump things that are true and things that are not true into one big pot of unimportance. the true things are FACT not THEORY and deserve their proper due.
spare me the condescention!
your ability to dismiss with predjudice that which you obviously don't understand is beyond me. i never claimed to know everything or to always be able to see the truth. i CAN read, however. i CAN put two and two together and i have no illusion that the people in charge are my betters or are acting in MY behalf.
btw- sublimation come from the Latin sublimare, meaning "to raise from", and that comes from Latin sublimis, meaning "uplifted". if you are making errors of meaning that are this ergregious(i know you're not a native english speaker), to where you have exactly reversed the actual meaning of the word, perhaps you've misunderstood quite a bit more in the same way.....
your ability to dismiss with predjudice that which you obviously don't understand is beyond me. i never claimed to know everything or to always be able to see the truth. i CAN read, however. i CAN put two and two together and i have no illusion that the people in charge are my betters or are acting in MY behalf.
btw- sublimation come from the Latin sublimare, meaning "to raise from", and that comes from Latin sublimis, meaning "uplifted". if you are making errors of meaning that are this ergregious(i know you're not a native english speaker), to where you have exactly reversed the actual meaning of the word, perhaps you've misunderstood quite a bit more in the same way.....
Gary isn't necessarily wrong though, just like Alex Jones isn't necessarily wrong...
We all take in a barrage of given information & churn out our opinions... Whether we impose those opinions on other poeple is entirely down to the individual. I've imposed my opinions on this forum before & ended up feeling like it just wasn't worth it - from anyone's point of view. But I guess that's mainly because my opinions were so awfull..
I've imposed my opinions on my parents & they looked well shocked, surprised, then just non-caring.
... Well, I have to forgive them on those counts since they've both worked hard in their lives & are now enjoying a holiday-filled retirement. Why should they care about the difference between the reality they've always known & the reality their son suddenly tells them about.
We all take in a barrage of given information & churn out our opinions... Whether we impose those opinions on other poeple is entirely down to the individual. I've imposed my opinions on this forum before & ended up feeling like it just wasn't worth it - from anyone's point of view. But I guess that's mainly because my opinions were so awfull..
I've imposed my opinions on my parents & they looked well shocked, surprised, then just non-caring.
... Well, I have to forgive them on those counts since they've both worked hard in their lives & are now enjoying a holiday-filled retirement. Why should they care about the difference between the reality they've always known & the reality their son suddenly tells them about. Ratziner's history is murky at best. i can leave that alone.stardust wrote:true shroomz.
But for me it is not important whether gary is wrong or right.
i could not care less about his personal hell he bears with a sharp mind and dignity.
When I said he is wrong I refer to the wrong statements about ratzinger.
No good style and no good argument.
gary just has no reason to be hubristic with the reality he owns.
i own no reality. my personal reality is not important.
it's a shame that you are so injured stardust, because of the strength of your posts, i thought you could handle the exchange without bad feelings. i never wished you harm even if the exchange seemed severe to you.
yes, you have a virus running that does not allow the computation. update your antivirus.
program=a series of instructions telling hardware how to function.
i NEVER said "all is lost". these are you words that you are putting in my mouth.
i NEVER said "every idealistic attempt in this world is per definition a delusion or undermined by the hidden agenda of the invincible inevitable world wide conspiracy."
i DID say that the powers that be fund all sides of the bogus "issues" that we discuss. the fact that the idea is idealistic, doesn't make working on it "productive". often our energy is dissapated fighting each other or tilting at the windmills. there IS a group that runs all this, but they're about as powerful as we make them. the thing is, that they are twisted in a way that their Joy and Peace is incomprehensible to us(they call themselves another species publically). naturally, it makes no "sense" and we do what they need us to, as the shepherd moves his flock from pasture to pasture, which seems soooo wonderful to the sheep, who can't imagine what's in store for them. their memories are tooo short to remember the treatment they got at the shearing, and they don't understand that the one driving away the predators, is in fact the TOP predator.... yeah, i say stuff like that.....
you want to argue whether Ratzinger sold ZyklonB, a product made by a company that is run by eugenicists, for eugenics purposes, doing a eugenics test run(because the Nazi camps were only a test of the principles that are to be more widely utilized in the future. just as the Poles, Germans and Czechs who had neighbors removed really didn't know what was happening until it was too late, if at all. they thought that "terrorists" and "ne'er do wells" were being rounded up but not abused if they even noticed at all...), or if he INHERITED the job of selling IG poison, fine. that doesn't matter to me. IG continues to do eugenics work. there have been a number of scandals in recent years, that company is rotten through and through. the people and groups that the false Vicar of God(he doesn't sit on God's throne. God doesn't need his help, JMHO) associate with don't make him look very clean. is this a surprise? there have been many scandalous Popes in history, this is another one.
if the church was really what it claims to be, a spiritual organization, then i would agree with your atttitude whole heartedly. but the Church has tentacles everywhere. they run business, they own stock, they own banks and in fact, behind the Rothschilds are the biggest banking institution on the planet. that runs governments. the Churches economy is bigger than all but the biggest governments. they have armies. to call Ratzinger just a spiritual leader is a grave misrepresentation of the man's true power and purpose. when the Pope arrives in a country, all laws and activities are bent to his comfort. even the most powerful politician bows his head in reverence, becomes subservient(the psychopaths in power understand pecking order and power) and kisses his ring bowing and scraping.
he certainly doesn't need you to protect him.
it's just a study of mine, i'm sorry it upsets you so. they study us, i study them. it's fair.
program=a series of instructions telling hardware how to function.
i NEVER said "all is lost". these are you words that you are putting in my mouth.
i NEVER said "every idealistic attempt in this world is per definition a delusion or undermined by the hidden agenda of the invincible inevitable world wide conspiracy."
i DID say that the powers that be fund all sides of the bogus "issues" that we discuss. the fact that the idea is idealistic, doesn't make working on it "productive". often our energy is dissapated fighting each other or tilting at the windmills. there IS a group that runs all this, but they're about as powerful as we make them. the thing is, that they are twisted in a way that their Joy and Peace is incomprehensible to us(they call themselves another species publically). naturally, it makes no "sense" and we do what they need us to, as the shepherd moves his flock from pasture to pasture, which seems soooo wonderful to the sheep, who can't imagine what's in store for them. their memories are tooo short to remember the treatment they got at the shearing, and they don't understand that the one driving away the predators, is in fact the TOP predator....
yeah, i say stuff like that..... you want to argue whether Ratzinger sold ZyklonB, a product made by a company that is run by eugenicists, for eugenics purposes, doing a eugenics test run(because the Nazi camps were only a test of the principles that are to be more widely utilized in the future. just as the Poles, Germans and Czechs who had neighbors removed really didn't know what was happening until it was too late, if at all. they thought that "terrorists" and "ne'er do wells" were being rounded up but not abused if they even noticed at all...), or if he INHERITED the job of selling IG poison, fine. that doesn't matter to me. IG continues to do eugenics work. there have been a number of scandals in recent years, that company is rotten through and through. the people and groups that the false Vicar of God(he doesn't sit on God's throne. God doesn't need his help, JMHO) associate with don't make him look very clean. is this a surprise? there have been many scandalous Popes in history, this is another one.
if the church was really what it claims to be, a spiritual organization, then i would agree with your atttitude whole heartedly. but the Church has tentacles everywhere. they run business, they own stock, they own banks and in fact, behind the Rothschilds are the biggest banking institution on the planet. that runs governments. the Churches economy is bigger than all but the biggest governments. they have armies. to call Ratzinger just a spiritual leader is a grave misrepresentation of the man's true power and purpose. when the Pope arrives in a country, all laws and activities are bent to his comfort. even the most powerful politician bows his head in reverence, becomes subservient(the psychopaths in power understand pecking order and power) and kisses his ring bowing and scraping.
he certainly doesn't need you to protect him.
it's just a study of mine, i'm sorry it upsets you so. they study us, i study them. it's fair.
i don't care if people disagree with me or if they think i'm wrong in particular. that doesn't make them right either.
i'm not shutting my mouth just to make you happy unless you will really cry and try to get me in trouble with my mommy.
i'll stick to my story and you stick to yours. if i find that my position is fundimentally flawed later, i'll change my mind. i hope you can do the same.
isn't that harmonious enough? gee that quote reminds me of an episode of the prisoner. he was found to be "disharmonious"(he refused to say that the village was wonderful the way they take care of everyone) and so was taken in for "spontaneous social conversion"( a fancy labotomy). i hope you don't plan on reporting me to the committee.....
i'm not shutting my mouth just to make you happy unless you will really cry and try to get me in trouble with my mommy.
i'll stick to my story and you stick to yours. if i find that my position is fundimentally flawed later, i'll change my mind. i hope you can do the same.
isn't that harmonious enough? gee that quote reminds me of an episode of the prisoner. he was found to be "disharmonious"(he refused to say that the village was wonderful the way they take care of everyone) and so was taken in for "spontaneous social conversion"( a fancy labotomy). i hope you don't plan on reporting me to the committee.....
i'm fine with that. i don't see EVERYthing as subjective, however. i think that's at least as big of a lie and a trap as everything being from that "supposedly superior one".
the truth is the truth and no amount of rhetoric will change that. if i'm wrong, i'm wrong. no big deal, i'm nobody. if i'm right, there's a mighty big problem. good sense requires thorough investigation, not just a complete blow off because it doesn't fit your world view.
the truth is the truth and no amount of rhetoric will change that. if i'm wrong, i'm wrong. no big deal, i'm nobody. if i'm right, there's a mighty big problem. good sense requires thorough investigation, not just a complete blow off because it doesn't fit your world view.
-
FrancisHarmany
- Posts: 1078
- Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Haarmania
I do not understand where people get the idea multiple realities exist. Same as the deluded statement "everybody has their own truth"! This is simply not the case!
Duncon Macloud knew..... "There Can Be Only One"!
For those of you doubting this: Explain to me how existence comes from Two. And then continue to explain within what those "Two" exist. This is not possible, hence the Oneness is proven. Please point to my flaws in thinking if you can, I am willing to adapt my own assumptions if you give usefull feedback.
so I see gary & stardust here showing us two things.....
gary travels down to earth and presents us with most pressing issues which need to be discussed in depth by the whole planet.
stardust stays true to his name and relates to the spiritual realms where all the answers lie.
the trick is to combine both to a fruitfull practice of words & actions in both "earth" and "spirit" worlds.
It is my believe the Pope hasnt got much good advice on either realms!
Duncon Macloud knew..... "There Can Be Only One"!
For those of you doubting this: Explain to me how existence comes from Two. And then continue to explain within what those "Two" exist. This is not possible, hence the Oneness is proven. Please point to my flaws in thinking if you can, I am willing to adapt my own assumptions if you give usefull feedback.
so I see gary & stardust here showing us two things.....
gary travels down to earth and presents us with most pressing issues which need to be discussed in depth by the whole planet.
stardust stays true to his name and relates to the spiritual realms where all the answers lie.
the trick is to combine both to a fruitfull practice of words & actions in both "earth" and "spirit" worlds.
It is my believe the Pope hasnt got much good advice on either realms!
-
MikeRaphone
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: slovenia
Ok, let us see;
Existence as we know it, can only come from Two, there is no other way of describing reality in positive terms than by dualism- namely existence and non existence, it's done within language. it is therein where those two exist, and there is no other way that you can posit existence hence Onenesss is disproven
Now, you say that Gary is of the Earth and Stardust is of the Spirit, that seem to me like two quite distinct realities, and each dwells in his own, isn't it?
What about fish's reality? Can you perceive the world from its perspective, can you experience how it feels to swim freely in the water? Don't you think it's a whole other world that it lives in?
And BTW- Pope is on dope Just kiddin'
Peace
Existence as we know it, can only come from Two, there is no other way of describing reality in positive terms than by dualism- namely existence and non existence, it's done within language. it is therein where those two exist, and there is no other way that you can posit existence hence Onenesss is disproven
Now, you say that Gary is of the Earth and Stardust is of the Spirit, that seem to me like two quite distinct realities, and each dwells in his own, isn't it?
What about fish's reality? Can you perceive the world from its perspective, can you experience how it feels to swim freely in the water? Don't you think it's a whole other world that it lives in?
And BTW- Pope is on dope
Just kiddin' Peace
May all sentient beings achieve liberation from suffering 
-
FrancisHarmany
- Posts: 1078
- Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Haarmania
@mike: non-existence ? whats that........ I believe you are stuck in dualistic thinking
@stardust: dont get me wrong, I get the feeling you are very grounded, but defending the poeples right to be ignorant about the things gary talks about
@gary: for the time being, I am with you, I am concerened, and I aint shutting up! so more power to you
@all: all your base are belong to us.
@stardust: dont get me wrong, I get the feeling you are very grounded, but defending the poeples right to be ignorant about the things gary talks about
@gary: for the time being, I am with you, I am concerened, and I aint shutting up! so more power to you
@all: all your base are belong to us.
-
MikeRaphone
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: slovenia
Oh Francis, come on.
I really hoped you'd put in some more effort
One line?
Anyway, of course you are right when you say i am stuck in dualistic thinking, and so are all of us. There is no other way to think- as long as we define thinkin' with using language, if you can point out a way how it is not so i shall be most astonished!
"Non existence" is obviously a word, it is a negation of the word "existence", but nevertheless we stay in the realm of language. And as long as we are confined to it we cannot avoid dualism. Mind you, i didn't make any statements about the ultimate nature of reality
Peace
I really hoped you'd put in some more effort
One line?
Anyway, of course you are right when you say i am stuck in dualistic thinking, and so are all of us. There is no other way to think- as long as we define thinkin' with using language, if you can point out a way how it is not so i shall be most astonished!
"Non existence" is obviously a word, it is a negation of the word "existence", but nevertheless we stay in the realm of language. And as long as we are confined to it we cannot avoid dualism. Mind you, i didn't make any statements about the ultimate nature of reality
Peace
May all sentient beings achieve liberation from suffering
people don't need to be led, but if they are blindfolded, then it will seem so.stardust wrote:Understood.FrancisHarmany wrote: @stardust: dont get me wrong, I get the feeling you are very grounded, but defending the poeples right to be ignorant about the things gary talks about
Ignorance of that kind will not be changed by naysaying, but only by good example and a way forward.
powermongers of all kinds have always held that the sheep need a shepherd...
i'm not against a system organized to achieve a goal. there needs to be a coordinator so the effort isn't wasted. the problem comes when significant amounts of power get involved. at this point, all candidates become untrustworthy, worthy of inspection and rough treatment for abuse of that power. in fact, the opposite situation exists. we are under intense scrutiny always spied upon, while authority is to be bowed to and not questioned. all instruments of power are to be wielded for the obviously untrustworthy(because power corrupts), instead of those who have voluteered to give their power to the coordinator for the general good(you know, the rest of the people).
scheming against the public(don't even try to deny that such a thing exists) is the ultimate disrespect that "authority" can do. the thing is, the public is supposed to be the ones who lead. the leaders are coordinators(at least that's the idea of the so-called "democratic republic"). anything else is plain old dictatorship.
when i say people don't need a leader, they just need to know what's really up, it's because we will know what to do, we can stop doing stupid things, if the anti-virus can be run. i didn't mean that there should never be leaders. i mean it's not leaders that will make everything great. even in your projects of 3 or more that had a leader, it's everyone who did the work. while a good leader might be essential for success, the other members performancers had as much or more(since there are more of the others) to do with that success. all members of the team are equally important, the leaders are not better than the followers. they are not worth more as humans.
all this because i dissed the pope. i apologise to any Catholics i may have offended.
scheming against the public(don't even try to deny that such a thing exists) is the ultimate disrespect that "authority" can do. the thing is, the public is supposed to be the ones who lead. the leaders are coordinators(at least that's the idea of the so-called "democratic republic"). anything else is plain old dictatorship.
when i say people don't need a leader, they just need to know what's really up, it's because we will know what to do, we can stop doing stupid things, if the anti-virus can be run. i didn't mean that there should never be leaders. i mean it's not leaders that will make everything great. even in your projects of 3 or more that had a leader, it's everyone who did the work. while a good leader might be essential for success, the other members performancers had as much or more(since there are more of the others) to do with that success. all members of the team are equally important, the leaders are not better than the followers. they are not worth more as humans.
all this because i dissed the pope. i apologise to any Catholics i may have offended.