i don't know if anyone will find this helpfull but i will pust it anyways since i spent more than a few hours testing things out.
it turns out that IF you have any channels ganged, grouped, or whatever have you, you can only succesfully assign a controller to the RIGHT side of the group, to control it via cc.
try assigning some controllers on the left side of the group, save the device (the only way to save cc's with a device apparently) and restart luna, pulsar, scope.
now if you check the cc assignments by right or ctrl - clicking, everything looks in order....but its not. go into the detailed view and you'll notice that
there are blank slots for where the volume, mute and solo assignment should be for your ganged channel controls.
on another note the soloing isn't very usefull is it? solo a channel and EVERY channel but the soloed one has its output removed from the mix outs....eh.
problem and workaround to assigning controllers to ganged ch
Why would you want to spoil 2 CC# on a coupled stereo channel volume? It's true what you say, RM242 only responds to last assigned or confirmed CC# on a coupled stereo fader.
So that's not a problem, it's rather a way from Creamware to guide you to better use CC#
after all, why would you couple them if wanted to control them separately!?
What I really don't like about RM242 is that Aux send buttons and faders are also coupled as following: couple Ch1 and Ch2. Ch1, Aux1'on', value'100'. Now Ch2 is at exact same setting.
I cannot use ie. a stereo reverb on that mixer, unless I do as you do, CC# assign every fader, but NOT couple the channels. Now you'll have make double amount of assignments. And browsing in your remote control device. And more risk of midi overload.
I think in one of my Pc1600x preset bundles, there might be some RM242 presets, inclusive mapping. Check my presets and their info files, they might have usefull little tricks for remote control -even if you don't own a Pc1600x.
atomic.
So that's not a problem, it's rather a way from Creamware to guide you to better use CC#
after all, why would you couple them if wanted to control them separately!?What I really don't like about RM242 is that Aux send buttons and faders are also coupled as following: couple Ch1 and Ch2. Ch1, Aux1'on', value'100'. Now Ch2 is at exact same setting.
I cannot use ie. a stereo reverb on that mixer, unless I do as you do, CC# assign every fader, but NOT couple the channels. Now you'll have make double amount of assignments. And browsing in your remote control device. And more risk of midi overload.
I think in one of my Pc1600x preset bundles, there might be some RM242 presets, inclusive mapping. Check my presets and their info files, they might have usefull little tricks for remote control -even if you don't own a Pc1600x.
atomic.
i appreciate your suggestions atomic, but i didn't imply that i was trying or even wanted to assign a cc for each each side of the group.
my problem arose from trying to assign a single cc to control the group, but it was on the left side of the group which i pointed out doesn't work.
if you assign a cc to the right side of the group to control both sides the cc is remembered. cc assigned on the left side and it is not remembered, as well as displaying wrong in the mini assigner as still being assigned.
i agree, having two mono auxes ganged doesn't make a whole lot of sense. i haven't really put the auxs to much good use yet so i haven't run up against that.
i had a look at one of your preset bundles, specifically the pulsar mixer one. the readme was a bit enlightening, i liked the idea about setting up a master fader for a specific group of channels. isn't there a preset for the pulsar mixer though?
i only use software cc control from within my sequencer which doesn't support assigning multiple cc's to one control, but that might be fun with a bunch of efx or synth parameters.
does the peavey scale its data or is it absolute? i think i remember reading it can do both, not sure though.
i doubt it has this function but if you could limit the data range sent and say reverse it or randomize its output by a percentage that would yield some interesting results. or say set take the cc data from two patches and morph between them from a single controller.
just doing some out loud brainstorming
//c
my problem arose from trying to assign a single cc to control the group, but it was on the left side of the group which i pointed out doesn't work.
if you assign a cc to the right side of the group to control both sides the cc is remembered. cc assigned on the left side and it is not remembered, as well as displaying wrong in the mini assigner as still being assigned.
i agree, having two mono auxes ganged doesn't make a whole lot of sense. i haven't really put the auxs to much good use yet so i haven't run up against that.
i had a look at one of your preset bundles, specifically the pulsar mixer one. the readme was a bit enlightening, i liked the idea about setting up a master fader for a specific group of channels. isn't there a preset for the pulsar mixer though?
i only use software cc control from within my sequencer which doesn't support assigning multiple cc's to one control, but that might be fun with a bunch of efx or synth parameters.
does the peavey scale its data or is it absolute? i think i remember reading it can do both, not sure though.
i doubt it has this function but if you could limit the data range sent and say reverse it or randomize its output by a percentage that would yield some interesting results. or say set take the cc data from two patches and morph between them from a single controller.
just doing some out loud brainstorming
//c
are you try this update?!
Stereo linking of channels is not resored with recording mixer rm242
Please copy this file into the directory ..Pulsarappscript so that it replaces the original file.
layer.pep
Stereo linking of channels is not resored with recording mixer rm242
Please copy this file into the directory ..Pulsarappscript so that it replaces the original file.
layer.pep
