Suggested Hardware for Creamware

PC Configurations, motherboards, etc, etc

Moderators: valis, garyb

subhuman
Posts: 2573
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Galaxy Inside

Post by subhuman »

I've tested quite a few platforms now with Creamware cards, and have been doing this for quite some time. I will eventually be able to give hard numbers and pretty graphs, but until then, here are my suggestions, based on careful tests, for the most reliable and highest performing computer parts for use with your Creamware cards.

It is suggested that you maximize your PCI performance by choosing a motherboard with a chipset with the best PCI performance. Delays, Reverbs, and Samplers all use PCI bandwidth, and although in theory most current boards should have 133mb/sec, in reality some boards have less than half of that! This of course leads to the "PCI Overflow" problem, but can be avoided by choosing a motherboard with a tested chipset.

It's suggested that you get the most simple board with the least onboard devices, as usually even onboard devices take IRQ resources, etc - sometimes they can be disabled, sometimes not - so unless you know for sure, get a no frills board with a solid chipset.


Motherboards:
Pentium IV + DDR -- Any board with Intel i845-DDR, I have three favorites, ASUS P4B266, Intel D845GB, and Abit BD7.

Pentium IV + RDRAM -- Any board with Intel i850 chipset performs well, I'm using ASUS P4TE with great success. Better memory bandwidth but slightly less PCI than i845-DDR. Also the Intel D850MV or D850MVL if you need network. We also use the D850MVL with great success.

Pentium III + SDRAM -- Any board with the Intel i815E, i815EP, i815EP vB. My current favorite hands down: ASUS TUSL2-C. Even more reliable, but not quite as high performance: Intel Motherboard D815EPEA2.


General P4 information: At this time if buying a P4, you will definitely want to make sure you get a Northwood core. These have 512K cache, double the previous P4 cores, and run cooler. A 2.0A seems the best price/performance ratio until the 2.2A Ghz version drops a bit more.

- - - - -

So far, for AMD, the tested chipsets include KT133A, KT266A, AMD761. Soon to be tested nForce (although nForce 415 looks a lot more interesting for our purposes). Future testing: SiS745 (once the ASUS board comes out). SiS735 will not be tested, although some have said they get great results with it - reason - no top quality board makers have a 735 board out, but will have a 745 out in the future.

The best chipset for PCI performance is by far the AMD761. Three favorites, ASUS A7M266, GigaByte GA-7DX, Epox 8K7A. Do expect much, much <b>less PCI performance</b> compared to the Intel solutions, but if you're using lots of VST/native plugins and rely on outboard reverb units, then this might be the perfect solution for you. The AMD CPu's price vs. performance is hard to ignore!

SCSI is not suggested, as IDE is cheaper, runs quieter, and, at least on the Intel chipsets, the onboard IDE header does not eat any PCI resources (generally, onboard RAID headers DO take PCI/CPU resources, something to keep in mind). Large SCSI RAID arrays on a traditional desktop PC literally take most of the available PCI bandwidth - if you want SCSI and want to use PCI intensive DSP devices like realtime samplers, reverbs, delays, then it is suggested you get a Workstation/Server motherboard with dual PCI buses, one bus for your DSP boards, etc, and one bus strickly for your SCSI array.

The only chipsets which should be avoided if you need to use anything related to the PCI bus, are VIA chipsets. The problems with PCI bandwidth issues with VIA chipsets are well documented around the web, and other people with PCI intensive devices have found a problem with ALL Via chipsets as well - including the KT266A. There is some 3rd party patch that may help this, but until this is fixed by Via themselves (ie: in a VIA 4-in-1 update), or unless you understand how to fix this issue, it's going to be suggested you avoid these chipsets.

(Note, the AMD761 Northbridge is often times paired witha Via southbridge - this doesn't seem to effect the PCI performance so much.)

Dual processors can also be used with Creamware, but you really should run duals only under Windows XP Pro, otherwise you might run into more issues. Also make sure the dual motherboard you get is the latest revision without any AGP or PCI problems. :smile:

Currently we have an Elektra inside a Tyan Tiger MP rev3 system with dual Athlon MPs, and we are getting great PCI performance and no issues to report at this time. We did have problems with the Tyan Tiger MP Rev1, so buyer beware.

I suspect I'll edit this post every so often to keep it up to date. Also if you have any of the mentioned untested motherboards (nForce, SiS745), feel free to try the PCI test so we can get a rough idea of how they perform. I'll eventually get a hard number from these, as well, but until then this could help guide us.

_________________
<a href=http://infinitevortex.com>Infinite Vortex Audio</a>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: subhuman on 2002-01-23 09:43 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: subhuman on 2002-01-23 09:45 ]</font>
User avatar
sandrob
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Slavonski Brod - Croatia
Contact:

Post by sandrob »

sub, i just pay for new setup:

Intel P4-478 0,13um Northwood 2.0 GHz, 512k, box
HDD IBM 123 GB, 120GXP, IC35L120AVVA07, Ultra ATA/100, 7200 RPM, 2 MB Buffer
IPC-975 19"4U Server 3*5.25"+(1+2*3.5") 2*noPSU
nVidia GeForce2 64MB DDRAM
mobo ASUS P4T-E
RDRAM 4x256MB, 184P PC800, 800MHz –
Aluminum Heat Sink w/2 Fan Ballbearing, TTC-HD82
ENERMAX EG465AX-VE Active PFC P4 431W D (PSU-182)

what do you think about this configuration!?
most of this i find on your site - so thanks again! :smile:
in croatia i must pay much (25%) more then from you, but it isn't too far!
sandro


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: sandrob on 2002-01-23 16:25 ]</font>
Morphium
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue May 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by Morphium »

Hello Subhuman,

a nice update on this topic indeed but still doesn´t clarify the situation on the nforce unfortunately.

Meantime I have a GA-7DXR in my Setup and my preordered Asus A7N266 arrived early January. Since then I have it still boxed lying in the corner because I dont want to mess with my nice working setup at the moment. What mostly interests me, is if the nforce can outperform the 761 (better is always better) or has any issues regarding pulsar and soundcards in general. Those nice words like DASP and Hyper bla bla sound very promising but I dont have the proof yet.

My little question...
When do you think would you have a nice test result on the nforce420?

Sincerly waiting :smile:
Drum-Maker
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Post by Drum-Maker »

Hi Subhuman, thanks for the post, but i must say that the KT266A is better than AMD 760 chipset!!

For now the best chipset is KT266A for AMD Mainboards!!

I had tested with Sandra Pro, but it's only 4 or 5 points more.

Finally it's quite the same KT266A and AMD760 are both good!!

I've only a question: My friend want to buy a dual processor P4, what is the best mainboard to buy?

Thanks

Regards

Drum Maker
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

Hi Drummaker, Benchmarks are quite useless for Creamware setups. You need real life DSP and PCI loading :wink:
My old MSI was slightly faster than my current system, but it gave me errors. Would you keep the mobo or keep the cards?

_________________
http://www.Neutron7.com

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: atomic on 2002-01-27 03:28 ]</font>
Drum-Maker
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Post by Drum-Maker »

Well, my test was also made with 4 Masterverb and 6 stereo asio2 channel, with a compressor, but I've only a Luna 2, therefore I can't say how good is with a pulsar 2 or with 2 audio boards with TDM Bus.

But the next 2 month I'm planning to buy a Pulsar XTC ... :smile:

Regards

Drum-Maker
subhuman
Posts: 2573
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Galaxy Inside

Post by subhuman »

AMD761 is quite without doubt MUCH better than VIA KT266A for Pulsar. I would not suggest you buy a VIA KT266A, it has the lowest PCI of all current motherboards - loads 2 masterVerbs with errors. :sad:
marcuspocus
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Canada/France

Post by marcuspocus »

On my CUSL2-C with a Luna2 and a Pulsar1 (7DSPs total), i load 7 masterverb without any errors, then the 8th one give PCI capacity reach, i try optimize and it work, all 8 of them...

Try an do that on any via! :wink:
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

You're right. He's only got 3DSP for now, not really enough to load lots of Reverbs. But he'll see... :eek:)
My Acorp 6A815EPD maxes out at 8 or 9 Masterverbs, my old VIA deck (MSI 694Dpro) couldn't even load one. I must admit the MSI is a VIA Apollo133A, later versions (266 series) could be slightly better. Don't expect miracles to happen, though :roll:
Drum-Maker
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Post by Drum-Maker »

Here are benchmarks on KT266a chipset, and for these benchmarks the KT266a is slightly better than AMD760 ...

http://www.amdmb.com/article-display.php?ArticleID=116
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

As I said, most benchmark test results do NOT report max. sustained pci bandwidth. As I said, my VIA dek w exact same config as my current 815, showed slightly better on SiSoft Sandra tests. It severely failed the reverbs tests.

:eek:
WayneSim
Posts: 124
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by WayneSim »

On 2002-01-23 09:42, subhuman wrote:

(Note, the AMD761 Northbridge is often times paired witha Via southbridge - this doesn't seem to effect the PCI performance so much.)

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: subhuman on 2002-01-23 09:43 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: subhuman on 2002-01-23 09:45 ]</font>
Subhuman, can you please give examples of these motherboards. I am considering buying the new motherboard by Gigabyte. (GA-7VRXP) I'm not shure if its out yet. But it has the 760 NB and a VIA SB. It is also based on the new KT333. (better than KT266A) BUT it has the AMD 760 NB!

It has many features like ATA133. I still don't know much about it. But it seems like a good AMD mobo.




<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: WayneSim on 2002-03-02 22:47 ]</font>
Immanuel
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Post by Immanuel »

To my knowledge there are NO MBs out with the AMD south bridge.

Immanuel
WayneSim
Posts: 124
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by WayneSim »

On 2002-03-03 11:06, Immanuel wrote:
To my knowledge there are NO MBs out with the AMD south bridge.

Immanuel
I said Northbridge.

Bump

Come on Sub please tell me about your findings with the AMD 760 NB and VIA SB.
If you can remember that is.

Thanks
Immanuel
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Post by Immanuel »

http://www.acme.com/build_a_pc/boardfinder/

Choose the AMD 761, and you will find just about everything on the market.

Immanuel
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

On 2002-03-03 22:10, WayneSim wrote:
...
Come on Sub please tell me about your findings with the AMD 760 NB and VIA SB.
If you can remember that is.
..
If he did, he can remember. If he did and they wore satisfactory, they ratings would be here.
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
subhuman
Posts: 2573
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Galaxy Inside

Post by subhuman »

On A7M266, I was able to get 5 masterVerbs, error on #5 or #6. This is AMD761+686B architecture, and is the best I have seen with my own eyes on a Socket A motherboard out of the box. I have heard that after a bunch of lowlevel tweaks you can get a VIA to perform closely to the AMD761; I wouldn't suggest it for people not extremely confident in their technical skills, though.
Morphium
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue May 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by Morphium »

@WayneSim

I have a Gigabyte 7DXR with 768MB DDR running Pulsar1 and SRB2 counting 10DSPs. I can load 7 MVs (error on #8)maxing out the PCI.
topaz
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by topaz »

Hi Subs, hope your well ;

just to say I get 12 MV's using A7M266
(only by pumping up the latency timer to 128)
#13 it overloads.

37 stereo PV's in LAP5.

im happy.

cya topaz.

On 2002-03-05 08:54, subhuman wrote:
On A7M266, I was able to get 5 masterVerbs, error on #5 or #6. This is AMD761+686B architecture, and is the best I have seen with my own eyes on a Socket A motherboard out of the box. I have heard that after a bunch of lowlevel tweaks you can get a VIA to perform closely to the AMD761; I wouldn't suggest it for people not extremely confident in their technical skills, though.
subhuman
Posts: 2573
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Galaxy Inside

Post by subhuman »

topaz, that is really amazing results, which I never have duplicated. Let me know which slots you're using for your cards! You're the first person to report so many on that platform, maybe you could take a screen shot with a dynamixer in the project (showing audio levels), and the DSP meter showing? Not that I don't believe it, but... :wink: Also, if the 1 person who had a working nForce could do the same, it would be sweet!

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: subhuman on 2002-03-06 09:58 ]</font>
Post Reply