Compared UAD and Scope stuff: Pultec vs. Poltec, Vinco Vs. 1

MCCY · Post by **MCCY** » Fri Jun 16, 2006 9:43 am

<a name="planetz-file"></a><a href="http://www.planetz.com/Pulsar/files/mus ... .mp3"><img src="/forums/images/listen_icon.gif" border="0" alt=" Song"> Song</a> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Genre: Blues <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Uses: Pulsar Effects copyright © 2006MCCY _____________________________________ I compared Comps & I compared Pul&Poltecs.
The way I tested it is not very usefull. I just don't want to spend much time in imitating settings, so it's rather a basic sound comparison. Settings are very similar.

First part in the audio demo is source material.

Second & third are comps, 4th & 5th are Puoltecs.

As I said, I did some more testing. The source is kind of extreme for the compressors and puoltecs sound totally different anyway.

Guess what was what, I'm very curious....

2=? UAD or SCOPE
3=? UAD or SCOPE

4=? UAD or SCOPE
5=? UAD or SCOPE

Martin

[ This Message was edited by: MCCYRANO on 2006-06-16 14:40 ]

braincell · Post by **braincell** » Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:44 pm

I liked 2 and 5 more because they sounded more even. I hope those are the Creamware. By the way which Creamware comp is it? I have 2, the Vinco and the Optimaster.

MCCY · Post by **MCCY** » Sat Jun 17, 2006 2:05 am

Tested the vinco...
I'll send you a privat message for dissolving the mystery ;o)

kensuguro · Post by **kensuguro** » Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:50 pm

2 sounds like vinco. To me it sounds like 2 has the rounder, more exaggerated mid-low that you get from vinco. I've never heard the UAD version tho. Don't have the pultec so can't say for 4 and 5.

MCCY · Post by **MCCY** » Wed Jul 05, 2006 3:13 am

2 Creamware Vinco
3 UAD 1176
4 Polteq
5 Pultec

[ This Message was edited by: MCCYRANO on 2006-07-05 04:14 ]