computer to slow after inst 4.5
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Terranova-Amsterdam
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Terranova-Amsterdam
back to this system.
H-rave, i did not de-install 4.0 now i can't???
I thought to be clever and install 4.5 in a different folder, it worked with sfp3.1 to scope 4.0.
now I first de-installed 4.5 and try to remove the 4,0 but I get error:no installation found-Abort!
very strange I can still start up scope 4.0, there is only no start up projekt running when I restart.
@hubird, I'm almost there!!
H-rave, i did not de-install 4.0 now i can't???
I thought to be clever and install 4.5 in a different folder, it worked with sfp3.1 to scope 4.0.
now I first de-installed 4.5 and try to remove the 4,0 but I get error:no installation found-Abort!
very strange I can still start up scope 4.0, there is only no start up projekt running when I restart.
@hubird, I'm almost there!!

I'm pretty sure that it's one of those typical nonsense messages (like cpu load 4500%), but I just can't remember in which context I've had it...
at least I HAVE seen it a couple of times and it was nothing serious. It's possibly associated with outdated code that's executed on a modern CPU
cheers, Tom

at least I HAVE seen it a couple of times and it was nothing serious. It's possibly associated with outdated code that's executed on a modern CPU
cheers, Tom
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Terranova-Amsterdam
you may have misunderstood the 'nonsense message' item.On 2005-12-25 02:39, virtualstudio wrote:
...Tom, this one is not, really I can still find the complete SFP folder, ...
It is 'without sense' because it's (almost certainly) a program sequence that was originally written with another version of Windows and another architecture of the mobo/CPU/menory in mind.
I never had a fundamental problem with my system, yet I remember having seen this message one or two times.
It is of course something that got triggered by an exception, it just doesn't point at the correct source of the error (which is what an error message is supposed to do)
cheers, Tom