pulsar 2 [2]

An area for people to discuss Scope related problems, issues, etc.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
User avatar
sandrob
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Slavonski Brod - Croatia
Contact:

Post by sandrob »

i have strange thing here.
all hardware io's have [2]?! Image
Image
i did scope reinstalation, but didn't help!

_________________
<font size=-2>i got my mojo working, but it just won't work on you</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: sandrob on 2005-10-07 08:30 ]</font>
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

If there's an IO daughterboard on your P2(1), its IO should be listed in its hardware folder... you didn't use the IOenabler.exe to disable IO for XTC with ASIO on another card? Have you tried to remove and reinstall the drivers in Device Manager? If not, or if that don't work, I'd reinstall the Scope software. If that doesn't work, email cw support eh.

Good luck, Sandrob!


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: at0m on 2005-10-07 08:59 ]</font>
ChampionSound
Posts: 334
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Netherlands

Post by ChampionSound »

I have exactly the same situation, but it doesn't bother me at all.
I have a pulsar 2 an I later added a 6DSP SRB board.
Now the Pulsar 2 card is displayed as Pulsar2(2), but I don't think it will do any harm, or am I wrong?

cheers
Guest

Post by Guest »

this means you have 2 cards and both need to be identified.

Pulsar 2 is the name of the card compared to pulsar (1) or Scope (project)

Pulsar 2 (#1 1st card in the system)
Pulsar 2 (2) (#2nd card installed)
Pulsar 2 (3) (#3rd card installed)

this way you can tell which card's I/O you are using. this is not a problem.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: antar on 2005-10-07 09:57 ]</font>
User avatar
sandrob
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Slavonski Brod - Croatia
Contact:

Post by sandrob »

i have one card with io's, second one is xtc board - just dsp.
everything working - no problem at all, but anyway i like to know why this happends?

i guess, because i replaced all cards yesterday and system now see 'fantom card'.
where can be this information?! in registry maybe?

bdv: meni pulsar2 is empty, whille all hardware io's i have i in the meni pulsar2 [2].
Guest

Post by Guest »

99% of XTC cards show up as Pulsars 2(as they are in fact pulsars 2 with no I/Os) however if you can not access the I/O for the XTC in the routing windows then it is simply listing the card #.


the # is to identify card priority.



<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: antar on 2005-10-07 10:19 ]</font>
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8455
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by astroman »

SFP checks the board order on every startup
first it scans the slots, first board found is assigned (#1)
then it checks if there's an entry in the cset.ini file to 'overule' this. If not it keeps what was found.

in your case both boards are 2nd generation (with the improved IO), so it's probably not relevant at all which one is labeled first and second - and you'll hardly mess the IO connectors as there's only one present :wink:

I have 2 Pulsar Ones, a couple of days ago SFP identified one as a Pulsar two and wrote 10 DSPs (!) - what a magical upgrade... :eek:
I was a bit concerned at first, but it has come back to it's mind again

cheers, Tom
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

Hoi Sandrob,

I understand you added a board, and now all IO's have shifted to [2]. This is indeed quite annoying, since all older projects will ask for the other one.

There's a tweak in cset.ini; to change detected board order, add:
[board0]
boardid=1
[board1]
boardid=0

Hope this helps!
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
User avatar
sandrob
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Slavonski Brod - Croatia
Contact:

Post by sandrob »

xtc board is placed in the first slot and pulsar2 (with io's) is in the 5. slot.
i don't use xtc so i disable xtc in instalation.
now i'm looking in the cset.ini, but i don't see nothing suspisious?
[Runpep]
InScreen=1
Language=English

[FileBrowser]
All Files=0
STS-Samples=0
LastPath=C:/Scope/Devices

[AudioFormats]
Wav=Wav

[Installer]
Version=3.0
App=SFP
OS=3.1
ProductID=0

[ReferenceResolver]
All files_Paths=C:/Scope/;
Modules/Devices_Paths=C:/Scope/Devices/;
Presets_Paths=C:/Scope/Presets/;
All files_AutoUse=1
Modules/Devices_AutoUse=1
Presets_AutoUse=1

[StaticPath]
Modules=
Modular=C:/Scope/Modular2 Modules/
Projects=C:/Scope/Projects/Examples/
Effects=C:/Scope/Devices/Effects/
Presets=C:/Scope/Presets/
HardwareIOs=C:/Scope/App/Application/IOs/Hardware/
SoftwareIOs=C:/Scope/App/Application/IOs/Software/
Bitmaps=C:/Scope/MRC Skins/
Devices=C:/Scope/Devices/
Samples=C:/Scope/Samples/

[Path]
Bitmaps=C:/Scope/MRC Skins/
Projects=I:

[APPEARANCE]
ToolTips=1
GridY=5
GridX=5
DragWindows=1
StandardCursor=1

[LOAD]
AlignSurfaces=1
LoadMixer=STM 1632.dev
LoadMixerEnabled=1
LoadDefBoard=0

[AUTOCONNECT]
InstrumentToMixer=1
EffectToMixer=1
AudioSrcToMixer=1
DeviceToMidiSrc=1

[SFP]
Favourites_Minimized=1
Favourites_Size=187
FileBrowser_Minimized=0
FileBrowser_Size=564
Top_Minimized=0
Top_Size=419
About_Show=0
About_PosX=254
About_PosY=14
ControlRanger_Show=0
ControlRanger_PosX=289
ControlRanger_PosY=89
ControlRanger_TopLevel=2000
SFPBar_PosX=1027
SFPBar_PosY=254
SFPBar_SizeX=238
SFPBar_SizeY=518
SFPBar_TopLevel=100000
SFPBar_RestoredSizeY=582
Bottom_Size=88
Bottom_Minimized=0
DSPLoad_Load=0
Dsp Load_Show=0
Dsp Load_PosX=282
Dsp Load_PosY=82
Dsp Load_TopLevel=2000
Registry_Load=0
ModuleRegistry_Show=0
ModuleRegistry_PosX=300
ModuleRegistry_PosY=102
ModuleRegistry_TopLevel=2000
Options_Load=0
Options_Show=0
Options_PosX=296
Options_PosY=96
Options_TopLevel=2000
Resolver_Load=0
ReferenceResolveOptions_Show=0
ReferenceResolveOptions_PosX=302
ReferenceResolveOptions_PosY=104
ReferenceResolveOptions_SizeX=332
ReferenceResolveOptions_SizeY=250
SFPRouting_Show=0
SFPRouting_PosX=127
SFPRouting_PosY=88
SFPRouting_SizeX=874
SFPRouting_SizeY=547
SFPRouting_TopLevel=0
FileBrowser_Show=0
FileBrowser_PosX=626
FileBrowser_PosY=185
FileBrowser_SizeX=261
FileBrowser_SizeY=363
FileBrowser_TopLevel=1
Splitter_Size=0
Splitter_Minimized=1
SFPDesktop_PosX=0
SFPDesktop_PosY=0
SFPDesktop_SizeX=1055
SFPDesktop_SizeY=548
SFPDesktop_Maximize=0
PulsarConfigSurface_Show=0
PulsarConfigSurface_PosX=274
PulsarConfigSurface_PosY=75
PulsarConfigSurface_TopLevel=2000

[RecentFileList]
Entry5=
Entry4=
Entry3=
Entry2=
Entry1=I:/Startup.pro
Entry0=c:/scope/app/SFPApp/StartProject.pro
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

Scope 4 has better board order detection (like telling v1 to v2 hardware afaik), but this Pulsar2 and Pulsar2 SRB confuse it. Add the 4 lines I posted above to override the auto-detection, and to solve the issue.
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
User avatar
sandrob
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Slavonski Brod - Croatia
Contact:

Post by sandrob »

thanks, atomic and all of you. :roll:
i add 4 atomics lines and probelm is solved. Image

_________________
<font size=-2>i got my mojo working, but it just won't work on you</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: sandrob on 2005-10-07 12:02 ]</font>
User avatar
sandrob
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Slavonski Brod - Croatia
Contact:

Post by sandrob »

On 2005-10-07 11:38, at0m wrote:
This is indeed quite annoying, since all older projects will ask for the other one.
project don't ask nothing. just open same as before, but with sighn [2].
so, this is not a big problem, but unlogic when hardware io's haveÿ[2] if i have only one card with io's.
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7681
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Post by valis »

I wonder, would leaving the card with all the physical i/o as the 2nd card in the system increase stdm traffic?
Post Reply