SX 3.01 out now...

Planet Z Announcements

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
AndreD
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg-audio.de
Contact:

Post by AndreD »

Counterparts
Posts: 1963
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Bath, England

Post by Counterparts »

:lol:

Would sir prefer 'A' or 'B' this evening?
AndreD
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg-audio.de
Contact:

Post by AndreD »

There is a new reverb called "room worx" and it should sounds better than A or B...

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: AndreD on 2004-12-16 10:42 ]</font>
User avatar
darkrezin
Posts: 2123
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: crackney

Post by darkrezin »

I heard it's the same as the freeware/donationware Ambience (www.smartelectronix.com) with a modified GUI.
nitty gritty
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Whitstable, England

Post by nitty gritty »

If that's true then bloody excellent I'd say!!
suthnear
Posts: 69
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: the end of the world

Post by suthnear »

I assume everyone here is using SX3 - are any of you haveing problems with MIDI latency and external synths? There is a thread on it here:

http://forum.cubase.net/forum/Forum2/HTML/072051.html
AndreD
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg-audio.de
Contact:

Post by AndreD »

On 2004-12-16 15:07, dArKr3zIn wrote:
I heard it's the same as the freeware/donationware Ambience (www.smartelectronix.com) with a modified GUI.
Yes, it seems to be the same...
Even the sound :lol:
Fortunately, I like the sound of ambience.
The export-fuction looks interesting!

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: AndreD on 2004-12-17 06:10 ]</font>
Counterparts
Posts: 1963
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Bath, England

Post by Counterparts »

suthnear wrote:
I assume everyone here is using SX3
Wow! That's quite an assumption :grin:

It is, unfortunately, incorrect.

I use SL (v.2 at the moment) myself, and there's quite a few people running logic on Macs.

Royston

p.s. re: new reverb == ambience, nice to see that Steinberg are still as big a bunch of slackers as ever! :smile:

DESPITE the fact that they've brought out 2x patches for SL2 (the last one FINALLY addressing the issue of insets being post-fader!), both the mixer and channel tracks meters still DO NOT display audio activity on the right channel (i.e. for a mono track). Cheers, Steinberg! :sad:
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7650
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Post by valis »

There's even a few stubborn logic PC users!
symbiote
Posts: 781
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 4:00 pm

Post by symbiote »

Go Logic PC!! =P
suthnear
Posts: 69
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: the end of the world

Post by suthnear »

On 2004-12-17 10:01, Counterparts wrote:
Wow! That's quite an assumption :grin:
I meant here as in this thread. Obviously not everyone on this forum...
hubird

Post by hubird »

...quite Logic...
User avatar
braincell
Posts: 5943
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Washington DC

Post by braincell »

I use Cubase SX 2.X. I am curious about Tracktion. I like Cubase but I'm not upgrading to version 3 because I don't see a compelling reason and it's an expensive upgrade. I just bought Ambience so I don't need the improved reverb.
User avatar
alfonso
Posts: 2225
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Fregene.
Contact:

Post by alfonso »

On 2004-12-25 16:23, braincell wrote:
I don't need the improved reverb.
Improved, maybe but it sucks bigtime :lol: and not compared to Warp's, but also Masterverb is such a superior class....

I went to sx3 from sx1, as sx1 was really a shame for it's limitations, I couldn't stop with vst 5.1 and used sx1 only for UV22hr.
Now, if they fix it, sx3 looks nice.
I hope that Yamaha makes things better, as the actual phylosophy of selling to betatesters (us...) is horrible.
Quifster
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 4:00 pm

Post by Quifster »

On 2004-12-17 02:34, suthnear wrote:
I assume everyone here is using SX3 - are any of you haveing problems with MIDI latency and external synths? There is a thread on it here:

http://forum.cubase.net/forum/Forum2/HTML/072051.html
I've finally solved the midi timing issues with sx 3.01.
I've bought a midex to get time accurate timing (LTB). I was stunned that the same problems still did occur. the behaviour was that notes start on time this way, but after a couple of measures notes seems to drift away from my vsti's or audio wav files. There were severe timing issues.

After a lot of testing i've discovered that the fault was in my creamware card. My creamware card acted as a master for syncing the midi clock. In sx3 this seems to be not working anymore, however, i;m not sure it's the fault of sx3 anymore. Maybe the clock is just 'broken'. What i did was synced my card to the wordclock on my ADAT. All my troubles went away !!! I've never experienced such a solid steady system.

So i'm happy now.

I've also discovered that setting the buffersize lower than 1024 with my creamware midi results in shifted notes during recording. The recorded position of the notes seems to be related to the buffersize that i've defined.
Switching to the midex solved this problem for me. (buffersize of 1024 was not an option for me).
Post Reply