Processing some old tapes...?

Please remember the terms of your membership agreement.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
Counterparts
Posts: 1963
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Bath, England

Post by Counterparts »

I have a couple of demo tapes I did back in my Atari Falcon days (I might even have the music on DAT, but I no longer have a DAT player).

Theres a couple of tunes there that I'd like to record into Scope and tidy up a bit before the recording degrades any further.

Any thoughts on what chain I could use to do this? I was thinking of using the expander to drop the hiss down level a bit and perhaps the graphic EQ to tweak the frequency balance. Then maybe some final dynamics oomph by using the optimaster.

Any ideas gratefully received!

Royston
User avatar
alfonso
Posts: 2225
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Fregene.
Contact:

Post by alfonso »

I'd suggest to record everything as is at the highest level without clipping, at the highest bitrate and apply any processing afterwards. This is not going to change effectiveness of processing, but you don't risk to be condemned to keep any processing done when recording.

Then you backup your files and you can study solutions and judge with your ears.
Counterparts
Posts: 1963
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Bath, England

Post by Counterparts »

alfonso wrote:
I'd suggest to record everything as is at the highest level without clipping, at the highest bitrate and apply any processing afterwards.
Ar...that's how I'm going to do it. Probably record it as a track in Cubase then apply some processing to that.
User avatar
alfonso
Posts: 2225
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Fregene.
Contact:

Post by alfonso »

Make different files of the different tracks, much easier to handle and faster to process.

:smile:
Counterparts
Posts: 1963
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Bath, England

Post by Counterparts »

:grin:

I should perform some clarifications!

They are just normal two-track casette tapes like:

Image

Royston
User avatar
Ricardo
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Just an Englishman in Oz

Post by Ricardo »

Hi Royston
I put it down on cubase, edit the start/end times then process just as you say. Only, go easy on the optimaster otherwise you just get reverb back. Rather I try just to use the STW mastering comp at the end. (Or both)!!
I also put it through PSY Q to great effect.
Bye :wink:
R
Counterparts
Posts: 1963
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Bath, England

Post by Counterparts »

Cheers Ricardo.

I think the track(s) were made quite some time ago, when my "philosophy" of adding Reverb went, "Well, everything should sound as though it's in the same room/space, surely?".

So, I used to just chuck the entire 2-track stereo mix at the reverb unit! :lol:
hubird

Post by hubird »

great :grin:
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8446
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by astroman »

if the old reverb isn't a means of style you can reduce it significantly with the Transient Designer - it's stunning.
I agree with Ricardo on the STW mastering comp. A great tool for spicing up some faint mix, but also capable to (almost) turn folk rock into punk :grin:
Hopefully you still have the original recorder, otherwise playing back the tapes could be surprising.

cheers, Tom
Micha
Posts: 471
Joined: Tue May 08, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Berlin
Contact:

Post by Micha »

more or less what I do with my "wednesday-tapes": recording 24/44', level about -5 dB, normalize, noiseprint/remove hiss and the "raw material" is ready for whatever optimaster/psyQ etc. Normalize/hiss done with Audition. Help possible, no big thing for me.
ReD_MuZe
Posts: 670
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by ReD_MuZe »

i realy recommend trying Waves X-noise
Micha
Posts: 471
Joined: Tue May 08, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Berlin
Contact:

Post by Micha »

yes, it's best at hiss reduction, just the price... And cannot remove backward noises (the solo is so hot somebody let fall down his beer bottle etc.) like Audition or Cedar can do.
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23364
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

osiris?
Herr Voigt
Posts: 624
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: germany, east

Post by Herr Voigt »

Osiris can be great, if you tweak carefully. So many options ...
Vinyl or tape, both can be airy-crispy after processing. And decrackler/denoiser/declicker are really good and don't destroy the music.
Counterparts
Posts: 1963
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Bath, England

Post by Counterparts »

astroman wrote:
Hopefully you still have the original recorder, otherwise playing back the tapes could be surprising.
Indeed I do! :smile: My Walkman Professional is still going (fairly) strong. The rewind and fast-forward decided to call it a day recently, but the play & record still works OK. Must have had that for at least 15 years now I reckon. I've got some surprisingly good results from my experiments so far; I didn't need to bother with any noise reduction in the end as the recording's still remarkably quiet (I don't have any specific noise/hiss-reduction tools anyway).

After recording it as hot as possible, it went through the Graphical EQ, Optimaster and PsyQ before dithering down to 16 bits and rendering to MP3 with LAME.

Pretty good for a crusty old tape that's been lying around for over ten years now!

Royston
Post Reply