Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2003 6:20 pm
hello list,
why not start a module wishlist?I know these Sfp developper guys and CW are just waiting on something like that...
ok, joke.I think j9k is the only one who created a cool m3 module in the last couple of months.And this one (a FOAM version for the modular) is the first one I want to start with:
- a modular FOAM version that outputs INSIDE the patch window, not on the midi out, so you can lfo-, envelope- & whatever-control everything in the patch, including delaytimes.
- a sample osc where you can set the start points and modulate it.What about loop positions?
- a notch eq which cuts off really everything except the freq's you want
- vocoder analyse/synthese modules that sound good.I mean, I could only get rather crappy sounds out of the original ones by CW.
Btw/OT:Is it possible that the Vocoder2 device by CW does not work in the Sfp 3.1 environment?In version 3.0 everything is ok.Sound is much better than the modular3 voco but dsp load is much higher...
why not start a module wishlist?I know these Sfp developper guys and CW are just waiting on something like that...
ok, joke.I think j9k is the only one who created a cool m3 module in the last couple of months.And this one (a FOAM version for the modular) is the first one I want to start with:
- a modular FOAM version that outputs INSIDE the patch window, not on the midi out, so you can lfo-, envelope- & whatever-control everything in the patch, including delaytimes.
- a sample osc where you can set the start points and modulate it.What about loop positions?
- a notch eq which cuts off really everything except the freq's you want
- vocoder analyse/synthese modules that sound good.I mean, I could only get rather crappy sounds out of the original ones by CW.
Btw/OT:Is it possible that the Vocoder2 device by CW does not work in the Sfp 3.1 environment?In version 3.0 everything is ok.Sound is much better than the modular3 voco but dsp load is much higher...