Posted: Mon May 06, 2002 7:19 pm
I'm just wondering what the potential pros and cons of putting 2 Luna II's (with adat expansion) into my G4 rather than 1 Pulsar. The main reason I would be doing it is for the i/o side, but I'm making several assumptions which I hope someone can confirm/deny.
1. 2 Lunas = 6 DSP's, which is the same as 1 Pulsar, so presumably it is equivalent in DSP power.
2. With the standardised 3.1 platform across all CW hardware coming up, there won't be any differences in the base OS for the cards.
3. Obviously I wont get the synth/effect bundle that comes with a Pulsar, but would still be able to use the full library of synths/effects available in the public domain for free.
4. The Scope 3.1 software should integrate the two cards completely re - routing environment etc.
5. I'll need some sort of connector between the two cards.
6. PCI bus traffic should be the only potential drawback.
Any info related to the above assumptions would be hugely appreciated.
Cheers, Bill.
1. 2 Lunas = 6 DSP's, which is the same as 1 Pulsar, so presumably it is equivalent in DSP power.
2. With the standardised 3.1 platform across all CW hardware coming up, there won't be any differences in the base OS for the cards.
3. Obviously I wont get the synth/effect bundle that comes with a Pulsar, but would still be able to use the full library of synths/effects available in the public domain for free.
4. The Scope 3.1 software should integrate the two cards completely re - routing environment etc.
5. I'll need some sort of connector between the two cards.
6. PCI bus traffic should be the only potential drawback.
Any info related to the above assumptions would be hugely appreciated.
Cheers, Bill.