Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2002 3:40 am
why less 3rd parties are making plugs for creamware?
i don't know, but if it's true........
PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com
Scope Users Community
https://www.forums.scopeusers.com/
why less 3rd parties are making plugs for creamware?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2002 4:35 am
good old dxl!
i don't know, but if it's true........
i don't know, but if it's true........
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2002 11:15 am
you already asked a similar question here: http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... 16&forum=1
and if your pulsar2 is so bad, please sell it to me
this way you can use your energy and money on "better" products
and if your pulsar2 is so bad, please sell it to me
this way you can use your energy and money on "better" products Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2002 11:17 am
Because the userbase is to small.
And because it's a closed system.
If you write VST/DirectX/R-TAS plugs, you only need a C++ compiler and a Software SDK. With Pulsar/Scope on the other hand, you need the Scope/DP hardware/software and a Sharc Developer kit from Analog Devices.
Also you need to learn the Scope/DP software, wich is very different from coding.
Kim.
And because it's a closed system.
If you write VST/DirectX/R-TAS plugs, you only need a C++ compiler and a Software SDK. With Pulsar/Scope on the other hand, you need the Scope/DP hardware/software and a Sharc Developer kit from Analog Devices.
Also you need to learn the Scope/DP software, wich is very different from coding.
Kim.
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2002 3:04 pm
that is what i heard and seeOn 2002-03-17 04:35, sandrob wrote:
good old dxl!
i don't know, but if it's true........
Fxpension, timework stop making creamwrare plug is ture... others...some with no action for a year already.
"celom" and "wavelength" and "ZargMusic" have new stuff going on.
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2002 3:11 pm
you think i don't want pulsar to be better??On 2002-03-17 11:15, musquash wrote:
you already asked a similar question here: http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... 16&forum=1
and if your pulsar2 is so bad, please sell it to me
more 3 parties will make creamware bigger and better support, and even better DSP plug qualities.
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2002 3:23 pm
Timeworks didn't stop making Pulsar plugs...that is what i heard and see
Fxpension, timework stop making creamwrare plug is ture... others...some with no action for a year already.
"celom" and "wavelength" and "ZargMusic" have new stuff going on.
Kim.
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2002 3:41 pm
hope timework still with creamware
just found other 2 they are still having some action
http://www.huicholity.com/newshop.html
http://www.dspdev.com/products_verbgold.asp
but super dsp hunger plugs.....
just found other 2 they are still having some action
http://www.huicholity.com/newshop.html
http://www.dspdev.com/products_verbgold.asp
but super dsp hunger plugs.....
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2002 11:04 pm
'nuff hating!
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:00 am
whatever you think!
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2002 11:49 am
I thought the Phatsync from FXpansion (in the NAMM brochure) was new? I know it from Cubase but didn't know it's for Pulsar as well. If it's new than it seems FXpansion didn't quite making pulsar stuff just yet, if not, forget I ever said this.
_________________
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: King of Snake on 2002-03-18 11:53 ]</font>
_________________
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: King of Snake on 2002-03-18 11:53 ]</font>
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:53 am
thank you!On 2002-03-18 00:00, dxl wrote:
whatever you think!