Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2001 8:10 am
by shloomper
Really nice
This 1 creates a virtual hard disk on the computer's RAM
very low latency when using samples stored on that drive...
http://www.superspeed.com/ramdisk.html
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2001 9:38 pm
by at0m
Cool! I used it in older OS'es, didn't know it still existed

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2002 1:11 am
by shloomper
With enough RAM on the machine.....one can install windows on the ramdisk and that is U-N-R-E-A-L!!!
works 30Xfaster
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2002 8:45 am
by remixme
Just out of purile interest?
How would one go about installing windows into a ramdrive?
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2002 11:44 am
by shloomper
Havnt tried it (not enough ram). Im sure its possible though, this small article describes how to do it with smaller applications...
Working with your application totally in RAM
By George Hawrysch, Ph.D.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: shloomper on 2002-01-01 11:51 ]</font>
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2002 1:15 am
by shloomper
the general idea is to make a bootable image from your system partition and use a script to boot...
of course 1 will need roughly 3gb of ram for this, but things would be different if you think 98lite micro weights about 70mb..
imagine this...running win98lite micro from the ram.....this must be ~ fast~ (:
A quote from superspeed's site:
"....Other techniques like caching your page file and placing the Operating System itself into RAM are also explained in other articles on this site...."
Interesting uses of RamDisk
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: shloomper on 2002-01-02 05:13 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: shloomper on 2002-01-02 13:17 ]</font>
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2002 6:02 am
by ohmelas
Okay Guys,
Are there any other real programs out there that you can buy or download that make this idiot proof for a guy like me?
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2002 4:18 am
by Gordon Gekko
#ééç@%!Gonna try this tonight, but shloomper, why do you say we need 3gb of ram to make it work? they are recommending 256megs

Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2002 5:16 am
by Gordon Gekko
err stupid me!! this thread got me excited like a kid and well aren't we close to running xp completely on RAM?

Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2002 12:02 pm
by astroman
I've tried out a similiar product under Win98 and was quite surprised that there wasn't a significant difference to the 'reference' physical harddisk recording I did. Can a driver be programmed that it's slower than moving mechanical parts?
Btw this was a slow 5400 disk.
Posted: Sat May 04, 2002 1:49 pm
by janila
When the OS is running it is mostly located in the memory. This is what's done in startup. It only changes the necessary components when doing different tasks. The copy process from the harddisk doesn't take that long and all the processing is done in RAM. Therefore running the OS completely from RAM woulnd't be that useful. I'm not certain thou.
Posted: Sat May 04, 2002 3:23 pm
by remixme
Windows Xp, has a function that can force all the core system files to me kept in memory say if you have 540+mb of ram.
I've tried it It gives a slight performance increase.
You need a program like tweakxp to do it though. Point is the makers of windoze have caught on.
Posted: Sun May 05, 2002 5:17 am
by cook
Had a look at the site.
I think only the start of programs will be faster. Working in those programs is the same! It's like you have a program in autostart - when you need it, it's already open!