MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Planet Z Announcements

Moderators: valis, garyb

User avatar
next to nothing
Posts: 2521
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Bergen, Norway

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by next to nothing »

I'm not THAT enthustiatic, and i would like more info on how i can utilize this. that being said it COULD potentially fill a hole which has been left wide open by SC for a long time; a way to utilize scope/creamware tech on new hardware without forking out 3000e for new hardware. If it works on newer windows systems (and even linux), with vst compability and reasonable hardware resources i find it very interesting. What puts me of somehow is the "one slot pr box" thing, if i understand it correctly i can load one instrument with high poly, but not two with half poly.

Then again, the price of a unit isn't that far from a single synth from the SC shop, and i get sharc power included. If i can design my own synth/effect and upload it to this device and run it standalone, you are looking at a powerful piece of kit. It is basically Reaktor on steroids.

What puts me off is that, as far as i understand, i cannot run Scope in a traditional way, using this as an audio device with multiple ins and outs, with the free routing scope is known for. If tah t would be possible, you could design your own interface based on your needs, with configurable I/O as youd like. THAT would be amazing.

Honestly, as a customer, i'd be willing to put a 15 year old grudge that doesn't even concern me behind if the product is right. Call me cynical if you want. Solaris 5 (the device), minimax and similar synths, Flexor etc where all developed on 4.5 if i am correct, so i'dsay the tech still can produce quality.

It hurts to see SC falling behind on development in both soft- and hardware, so i welcome any initiative to push the platform further. But i would like to see this in action before i finally make up my mind.
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
Mikael-R
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 11:33 am

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by Mikael-R »

For the sake of the argument, imagine that the MPA takes off and becomes really popular. With time hundreds of plugins might be developed for it. Some of the customers that have bought MPA products might be in need of a soundcard that can work as a hub, or some might want something powerful yet compact that fits in a rack. Then they will come across Xite-1 and think: "great now I can use all my favorite MPA plugins inside my soundcard", or "now I don't need a lot of dongle MPA boxes laying around, I can just use this with my laptop to load my favorite plugins".
Then they will find out that they can’t and think: "I can't run the plugins I want on the Xite-1, what a disappointment. There are a lot of interesting plugins available, but at the end of the day why bother buying the Xite-1 for 3 890 eur or Xite-1 D for 2 400 eur so I can buy plugins I might not need, and also there is no way to demo it without the hardware". Let’s just go for something else.“

My point is that SonicCore would probably benefit in the long run from being 100% compatible with the MPA system. With some extra cashflow and attention they might be able to afford to fix some issues with the Xite-1 like: MADI interface, USB 3 connection to computer (if technically possible), a project loader that can load projects without a computer with the help of MPA expertise. Maybe fix some SAT-connection issues if possible. If they do all of that and is 100% compatible with the MPA system who will be able to compete? MPA will have no interest in coming up with a competing product if SonicCore already does everything right, on the other hand if they refuse to work together MPA might sooner or later decide to make their own version of Xite-1 that might win out because of the compatibility issues.
Of course, this is just speculation, MPA might just become another Plugiator. On the other hand maybe they didn’t want to push the plugiator more because they had a greater vision in mind.
Mikael-R
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 11:33 am

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by Mikael-R »

I don't see what the drama is about. Frank wrote what he was planning to do with his own company and he clearly pointed out that he hadn't talket to Holger yet, probably because they weren't the best of friends. He has abandoned some projects he didn't longer believe in, that seems like a helathy approach (not a sign of disloyality)
I guess what it boils down to is some conflict about some plugins that were sold by inDSP that they hadn't the rights to, or someone can correct me if I'm wrong.
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7306
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by valis »

Hey guys, this is the same underlying Scope (v4 era) implementation on Analog Devices technology that was used for Plugiator and etc, implemented for a lower cost solution that is in-line with the tabletop trend that has been...trending...for some time now. It should work with Scope or any other studio tech just fine, but I doubt it will drive new users to SonicCore or vice versa to the degree that I am seeing discussed. It does seem to be semi-modular (in the techy sense of the word, not in the classic analog wall-mounted sense of the musical world).

Holger was clear that we should avoid lashing out at Frank or assuming too much, and so please respect that. Otherwise, consider this just as you would any other new tabletop tech for us music mavens, something that may or may not suit your chosen workflows and be evaluated as such.
User avatar
yayajohn
Posts: 1694
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:01 pm
Location: Everywhere....Nowhere

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by yayajohn »

Thanks valis; I don't really see any "Frank bashing" going on here as of late but it's probably best to remind people to mind their manners.
Reputation matters to smart consumers, there's no drama it's as simple as that.
Mikail; Your unbridled enthusiasm for this project is starting to reek of a vested interest. I'm not really sure if it's personal or monetary but perhaps it's that you've already purchased this and wish others to join you? If so I'm looking forward to your unbiased review once this ships, especially value for money paid.
Mikael-R
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 11:33 am

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by Mikael-R »

I’m mostly taking on the role of the optimist to balance out the pessimists and keep the discussion more interesting.
I didn’t say that what I wrote earlier was a likely scenario or that it would happen soon.
The most likely scenario would probably be a very slow growth if the company survive, the market is already saturated with good and cheap products. Yet, at the same time if they can offer something that can simplify and remove clutter while keeping very high sound quality then I think they have a good chance in the long run. If one can remove midi interfaces, audio cables, mixers and do everything via ethernet cables and some MPA boxes that you can modify however you want (I’m not sure if that is what they are going to be able to do), that is going to be desirable.
The thing that impresses me the most is how adaptable and flexible it seems to be, so it’s like it’s bound to find some use here and there unless the company goes bankrupt.
The worst case scenario for SC’s part might be that people that had considered buying the Xite-1 for some classic creamware plugins now instead buys the MPA box. On the other hand it could be a stepping stone into the system that SC always have needed.

It would be good if someone that actually know what they are talking about can correct my specualtions, I just spent some time on the website and on this thread and I don't have a deep technical understanding of how the system works. And I won’t be buying the MPA system for a long time since I already have the plugiator. It will depend on the features it will get in the future.

I guess my so called “vested interest” might be that I would like to see as a company that favors the DIY spirit succeed. There is something appealing about not having to rely on mass produced generic instruments that might lack one specific feature you want. And also having an instrument that you can build on and improve over time. Etc.

Now I will try to forget about the MPA thing for a year or so, it's time-consuming to write forum posts.
User avatar
yayajohn
Posts: 1694
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:01 pm
Location: Everywhere....Nowhere

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by yayajohn »

ok, fair enough :)
Personally I think the concept is worthy, minus the almost 20yr old plugins
but chop the price to 1/10 what's being asked and I think it stands a chance. If not then the current price puts it in a category that it cannot compete.
Just my opinion, but I'm not a DIY'er either so not really the target audience.
Oh and the Xite-1 is much much more than a synth plugin but you know that :wink:
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8406
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by astroman »

Noone buys an Xite to run 'old Scope plugins', you want it for it's routing and rock-solid audio performance.
Of course the synths and fx are welcome as a huge bonus...
Moog released a Model D ($15) that runs on an iPhone 5s :D
In fact I could cover most of my sound synthesis in IOS only and while (atm) doing some software spring-cleaning I found the most interesting Scope devices were from either the abandoned of modular category.
But I'd never want to miss the routing and sub-system design that's so easy with Scope.

In a more general context the main thing to significantly improve Scope/Xite sales would be a more workflow oriented approach with easier control beyond the midi protocol.
I admit to benefit a lot from the ongoing support of 'old gear' aka PCI cards. A rare exception on today's market - and I'm grateful forever to all the folks responsible in one or the other way to keep it up.

But knowing the system for decades I also know how difficult a(ny) 'new approach' would be - keeping the great things of the past and turning it into an innovative system as convincing as ever (which has been tried a couple of times iirc).
Funds are limited, so steps are small... that's way it goes ;)

As mentioned I lack to see any (solid) direction in the MPA system, but a lot of empty space 'left to user ideas'.
I'm also in an IOS forum and know how 'smart' the majority of such users is... most cannot even read anymore but need a video instruction, while waiting on the next 'sales' :D

I have an interface that supports 2 iPads simultanously and this is connected by simple analog stereo busses to both a Scope and a Pro Tools TDM system. It lets me record audio/midi in any of the 3 worlds and feed audio for processing through any of them in live mode. With just plain current technology.
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7306
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by valis »

What interface is that?
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8406
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by astroman »

It's an iConnectAudio4+ (by iConnectivity), the only interface with double-host feature.
The 2 USB ports connect to any OSX, Win or IOS system in any mixture (2x IOS, 1 Win 1 OSX, 2 Win, etc).
There's a routing matrix with physical and software ports (up to 10 virtual stereo channels) to connect between systems.
You could have an IOS synth show up in a Logic track, or route a Logic track to Cubase on PC, as you could route a mic input to 2 DAWs at the same time.
This also exists for the 2 Midi DIN ports and a dedicated USB port for external midi hosts (up to 10 iirc).

The routing-mixing control panel isn't the most intuitive design, but one can get along with it.
Unfortunately they don't develope this panel further, but turned to an 'automated' thing that tries to guess what you're after (which is pretty much bs, but the original software is still downloadable).
There's also a full sysex documentation if you feel challenged to write your own control software (probably).
Mikael-R
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 11:33 am

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by Mikael-R »

astroman wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2019 12:11 pm As mentioned I lack to see any (solid) direction in the MPA system, but a lot of empty space 'left to user ideas'.
I'm also in an IOS forum and know how 'smart' the majority of such users is... most cannot even read anymore but need a video instruction, while waiting on the next 'sales' :D
I think that if they want to have any mainstream success they should focus on distilling their technology to something simple and beutiful that just works without hassle, like the apple philosophy. Most people today have a lack of time and energy after work. What if for example the Moog iPhone app could automatically and wirelessly feed from an MPA box as soon as you open the app. If they can convince people that they will get a sonic edge compared to others that produce only in the box without sacrificing workflow, it would be an easy sell I think.
With that said, not everyone has to strive for mass market success.
Last edited by Mikael-R on Fri Apr 19, 2019 1:10 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Mikael-R
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 11:33 am

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by Mikael-R »

Also, there is the mantra: “It’s all software in a box anyway, if it’s not analog you can just as well run it on a computer.“ I have my doubts about the truthfulness of that statement but it is none the less what anyone developing DSP solution has to deal with.
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23248
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by garyb »

there is no truthfullness to that, but many, if not most don't care.
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7306
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by valis »

Also, being 'mainstream' as a measure of success isn't as meaningful as that may seem at first glance. Consider the 'mainstream' companies like Gibson that have gobbled up products and companies that we have loved, only to put them out to pasture after distilling what once made those brands and products great to extract what profit was able to be extracted. If memory serves, Creative Labs and many others have done this to companies and products that were quite well made, but not long-lived once under a 'mainstream' flagship brand. Is that really what we need for our personal and professional work?

There's nothing wrong with the Botique approach, and while the days where DSP was a necessity may be behind us, that doesn't mean that Motorola and Analog Devices, not to mention the products that run on these platforms, are dead. It simply means that the 'mainstream' moved on to plugins and is now served by by mobile, tablet and even free desktop products (Cakewalk, Traktion etc). That does NOT mean people will stop buying flagship digital synths, analog classics, well made instruments of any type or even our beloved Scope.

It does however mean that Sonic|Core has a limited and niche market to serve, and to suggest the 'answer' to that is to cast a wider net in an effort to distill this platform into something 'mainstream' is dubious imho. I however would like to see SonicCore have enough additional income to support someone besides Holger
Mikael-R
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 11:33 am

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by Mikael-R »

Mikael-R wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:12 pm Also, there is the mantra: “It’s all software in a box anyway, if it’s not analog you can just as well run it on a computer.“ I have my doubts about the truthfulness of that statement but it is none the less what anyone developing DSP solution has to deal with.
garyb wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 5:00 pm there is no truthfullness to that, but many, if not most don't care.
The good thing is that MPA can probably bypass that prejudice by marketing things like “hands on approach” or “standalone functionality”.
Mikael-R
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 11:33 am

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by Mikael-R »

Ok I will try to see it from a different perspective. Let’s imagine the worst-case scenario: A company copies a technology and lower the price so much that it is impossible for the original company to compete. This new company might not have any real passion or vision except monetary, and might therefore sooner or later degrade or die because it lacks drive and innovation. But not before it has killed of its competitors, leaving us with nothing.
Will porting SC plugins to MPA dry up sales of SC? As far as I know the only people aware of SC is people who have used creamware products in the past or heard about it via word of mouth. An example of the above scenario could be someone who has used ASB synths and now wants it in compact format and has a lot of money. They might skip the Xite-1 and go for the MPA, and as a consequence hurt SC sales. Yet, we are talking really small numbers here and it’s not like those numbers are growing. If there were many cheap MPA products on the market SC might be in a paradoxical situation. On the one hand the MPA boxes could keep some people away from SC since they both to a small degree offer the same things. On the other hand, it could give SC free advertisement. If SC could take advantage of some potential MPA success I think it’s a good thing, and being more integrated with the MPA could be one way of achieving that. But then there are the delicate problem of transfering plugins between MPA systems and SC. It could be difficult if the relationship isn’t great to start with.

I think it’s a problem that people can spend years in the audio gear market and not even know that SC exist. I think some publicity is better than nothing at all. Let’s for example imagine that a thousand guitar players buy an MPA box to use as a guitar pedal, they can load and control plugins via a tablet. One in a thousand might decide to buy an Xite-1, it’s not much but its’s better than nothing. Some UAD developers might port over their plugins with the intent of making their plugins available for users who wants the standalone functionality. Suddenly Xite-1 has some UAD plugins and can begin to compete a little bit with UAD’s rackunits. A large user base is always a good thing for plugin-developers, if MPA and SC can share that userbase I think they would benefit both.

Another perspective that some might have in this forum is that they don’t want “the masses” to be given access to the gear that you have paid a lot of money for and as a consequence diminishing your ability to be competitive. I don’t think that is very relevant here since no one can stop the price drop on the market. For example: no one can tell Behringer what they should charge for their products. An original Moog owner might not be glad that everyone can buy an analog Moog from Behringer now. What I’m trying to say is that there isn’t any point in trying to protect something that’s still going down in price weather you like it or not. For some years ago the Minimax was probably valued higher because it was rarer. Anyone can now get a sound with similar quality to scope by using some hardware and high-quality plugins from UAD/Native (not in such a neat package as scope but still). So, I don’t see any point in keeping the technology a secret or protect it, because then we may end up starving our investment which causes it to halt in its development.
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23248
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by garyb »

all of these ideas are nice in theory, but not how things actually are.
i would say much more, having some actual behind the scenes knowledge, but i do not want to be negative or insult anyone.

also, there is no desire to keep such tech from "the masses".

original Moog owners don't care about Behringer's clone. their synths are not devalued in any way.

the only real shame is that wannabes and kids are now controlling the market. it's fine. cheap crap doesn't hurt anyone, unless cheap crap is substituted for actual quality. in that case, it's bad for EVERYONE. welcome to the Brave New World.

suffice it to say that these arguments are irrelevant. buy MPA, if you like it and it helps you. it will go the same route as USE|Audio. many will love it, and many will find it to be second-rate garbage. it is up to the user to decide.

SCOPE IS NOT JUST SYNTHS! that's true even if synth users are a major part of the vocal participants. actually, the strongest part of the Scope system is mixing and routing, but there aren't that many who are creative and knowledgeable enough to take advantage of that. Synths are certainly an easier sell.
Mikael-R
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 11:33 am

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by Mikael-R »

I’ll should probably stop posting in this thread soon, but here we go :)
garyb wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2019 11:18 am all of these ideas are nice in theory, but not how things actually are.
i would say much more, having some actual behind the scenes knowledge, but i do not want to be negative or insult anyone.
I’ll admit that I don’t know much besides the surface stuff that they have presented. I also have introduced a lot of speculation of what the technology might do in the future, of course I don’t know.
garyb wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2019 11:18 am also, there is no desire to keep such tech from "the masses".
original Moog owners don't care about Behringer's clone. their synths are not devalued in any way.
For some users it might be an unconscious thing, I don’t know.
garyb wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2019 11:18 am the only real shame is that wannabes and kids are now controlling the market. it's fine. cheap crap doesn't hurt anyone, unless cheap crap is substituted for actual quality. in that case, it's bad for EVERYONE. welcome to the Brave New World.
Maybe MPA can offer cheap quality.
garyb wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2019 11:18 am suffice it to say that these arguments are irrelevant. buy MPA, if you like it and it helps you. it will go the same route as USE|Audio. many will love it, and many will find it to be second-rate garbage. it is up to the user to decide.
The MPA technology is so much more versatile than what useAudio offered. Of course, in its present state they just offer a crippled plugiator, not something to get excited about. The exciting thing is the potential for both SC and MPA. Like I said, that is just my impression from looking at it from the outside and I don’t know what will happen.
garyb wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2019 11:18 am SCOPE IS NOT JUST SYNTHS! that's true even if synth users are a major part of the vocal participants. actually, the strongest part of the Scope system is mixing and routing, but there aren't that many who are creative and knowledgeable enough to take advantage of that. Synths are certainly an easier sell.
That is why selling synths and effects that works in MPA boxes can be a good stepping stone into Xite-1.
Try to sell the workflow of Scope’s mixing and routing to someone who is used to work in the box and has a bunch of native plugins they like to use. Not very easy as you pointed out.
Last edited by Mikael-R on Sat Apr 20, 2019 2:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mikael-R
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 11:33 am

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by Mikael-R »

When I think about it, I do believe that the space-saving and portability factor is Xite-1s biggest strength and selling point. You don’t need a room full of crap in order produce at a very high standard. All you need is any laptop with express-card slot and the unit itself. It’s almost as portable as producing inside the box.
MPA biggest strength and selling point might be its ability to adapt to different circumstances while not being reliant on messy computer operating systems.
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7306
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Re: MPA: A whole new Chapter for SCOPE and you are invited

Post by valis »

garyb wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2019 11:18 am all of these ideas are nice in theory, but not how things actually are.
i would say much more, having some actual behind the scenes knowledge, but i do not want to be negative or insult anyone.

also, there is no desire to keep such tech from "the masses".

original Moog owners don't care about Behringer's clone. their synths are not devalued in any way.

the only real shame is that wannabes and kids are now controlling the market. it's fine. cheap crap doesn't hurt anyone, unless cheap crap is substituted for actual quality. in that case, it's bad for EVERYONE. welcome to the Brave New World.

suffice it to say that these arguments are irrelevant. buy MPA, if you like it and it helps you. it will go the same route as USE|Audio. many will love it, and many will find it to be second-rate garbage. it is up to the user to decide.

SCOPE IS NOT JUST SYNTHS! that's true even if synth users are a major part of the vocal participants. actually, the strongest part of the Scope system is mixing and routing, but there aren't that many who are creative and knowledgeable enough to take advantage of that. Synths are certainly an easier sell.
I do believe you have everyone's ear, as a steward here for the Scope platform we all understand you have a closer persective than most. I do hope, however, that you didn't interpret my statements about mass marketing as implying Holger has no desire for wider success. I suspect not, but just to be clear my point is that success is a metric that we define ourselves, it's not defined by the 'masses' nor by our publicly visible income stream(s). And of course, anyone would welcome more income if they had the ability to keep up with production without sacrificing their capability to continue to produce results (ie, burn out or sacrifice the principles on which their business is built just for greater earnings in the short term, as the examples I pointed out did).

We of course are agreement on MPA. If this appeals to someone's workflows or even buying impulse, send some income to Frank to and enjoy your exploration of what is on offer. I also agree about Scope's strengths, they go well beyond synths alone.

What I personally enjoy about Scope is its flexiblity. I only have 10 dsps, but that means I can accomplish a few complex internal mix chains ("busses" of items combined) as well as a few reverbs for external devices and the like, and use Scope alongside my other gear in a way none of that other gear really accomplishes on its own. In my case it's basically akin to what very powerful workstation in rack form accomplishes, and more. And in my case, this is why I continue to maintain a machine and cards that have been with me for almost 2 decades, and will I'm sure be with me for far longer. Certainly longer than my last and current laptops, my iPad and so on. And yet I've also had some of my synths for this long as well, they are like my family now. As is this community :D
Post Reply