Flexor II Module Expectations
- next to nothing
- Posts: 2521
- Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Bergen, Norway
-
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Land of Polarbears
- Contact:
True stereo versions of every module (well the ones which would be worthwhile in a stereo synth or fx architecture anyway). I think the system would be improved & probably streamlined if modules are available in stereo format as well as mono where relevant.
I'm a bit dissapointed that so many of the stock CW modules don't have text entries for all of their parameters. There's absolutely loads of parameters on lots of the modules in there which need controlled over midi to get any idea of what value the pots are currently at. If every single parameter had a text entry or even just a central display module (virtual LCD) which gives a real-time read out of parameter values as you tweek them, then we would have a much deeper (more accurate) level of control when building & tweeking patches.
Another point worth a mention is pot/knob size for parameters such as course tuning of an OSC. It would be nice to see some larger controls for such params as it would give a nicer feel & greater degree of tuning accuracy without resorting to midi control.
That's all for now, but I might add more as it comes to me
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Shroomz on 2006-09-01 16:30 ]</font>
I'm a bit dissapointed that so many of the stock CW modules don't have text entries for all of their parameters. There's absolutely loads of parameters on lots of the modules in there which need controlled over midi to get any idea of what value the pots are currently at. If every single parameter had a text entry or even just a central display module (virtual LCD) which gives a real-time read out of parameter values as you tweek them, then we would have a much deeper (more accurate) level of control when building & tweeking patches.
Another point worth a mention is pot/knob size for parameters such as course tuning of an OSC. It would be nice to see some larger controls for such params as it would give a nicer feel & greater degree of tuning accuracy without resorting to midi control.
That's all for now, but I might add more as it comes to me
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Shroomz on 2006-09-01 16:30 ]</font>
I'am in lack of bipolarity ... would like pitch bipolar modifiers and mixers + something like that : http://www.ear-group.net/model_14.html quite a smart multi-purpose module, also model 17
VC mixers like Doepfer A-135
Something like the A -143-1.
A Track & Hold
" Multiple " module a little like the 1x8 switch but without the switch option and one model with bipolar outputs, one with sweeping option ( well it's a little the A-152 )
Merging the diode, half inverter and such into one " multimaxiverter " module with or without the switch option ( multiple outs at once )
Well merging old CWA into compact multi-uses modules in the spirit of hardware like dual ringmod and such to gain GUI space.
Squishing as most as possible modules like Val Freeze, GUI space again
Fade mod for granular sequencer
Gfx on / off for Hyper note sequencer ( despite there's not too much space left )
Sample delay mod.
On top of my head for now ...
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: decimator on 2006-09-01 11:08 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: decimator on 2006-09-01 11:10 ]</font>
VC mixers like Doepfer A-135
Something like the A -143-1.
A Track & Hold
" Multiple " module a little like the 1x8 switch but without the switch option and one model with bipolar outputs, one with sweeping option ( well it's a little the A-152 )
Merging the diode, half inverter and such into one " multimaxiverter " module with or without the switch option ( multiple outs at once )
Well merging old CWA into compact multi-uses modules in the spirit of hardware like dual ringmod and such to gain GUI space.
Squishing as most as possible modules like Val Freeze, GUI space again
Fade mod for granular sequencer
Gfx on / off for Hyper note sequencer ( despite there's not too much space left )
Sample delay mod.
On top of my head for now ...
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: decimator on 2006-09-01 11:08 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: decimator on 2006-09-01 11:10 ]</font>
Yeh!! I've been thinking for while now, why not have like Quad LFOs, ADSRs etc.On 2006-09-01 11:01, decimator wrote:
Well merging old CWA into compact multi-uses modules in the spirit of hardware like dual ringmod and such to gain GUI space.
This idea and any similarly unusual ones (more weird modulation possibilities which are abundant) would b killer additions.Sample delay mod.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Shroomz on 2006-09-01 14:39 ]</font>
Another issue I have with the modular is having no multi OSCs which have multiple waveform outs like you find on almost every old & new modular system including Clavia's. Instead, we're stuck with needing seven different modules to build an OSC with seven shapes & seperate outs for each shape. This is poor use of space & missing out on one of the real beauties of modular synthesis.
Yeah, I'am with Shroomz for multi outs for OSC and also LFOs like take MultiLfo A with " all outs " + non - integer ratios and possibility to hardsync
Also a bi-phase and tri-phase ( sine ) LFO with modulation on phase and on non - integer ratios and outputs for 1+2 1+3 2+3 1+2+3 and 1*2 1*3 2*3 1*2*3
j9k made a quite handy 8 X 8 mixer matrix with bipolar knobs but it eats some DSP, I wonder if DSP load could be reduced ... or a 4 X 4, 6 X 6 made.
Ah, also a Freq multiplier mod
Also a bi-phase and tri-phase ( sine ) LFO with modulation on phase and on non - integer ratios and outputs for 1+2 1+3 2+3 1+2+3 and 1*2 1*3 2*3 1*2*3
j9k made a quite handy 8 X 8 mixer matrix with bipolar knobs but it eats some DSP, I wonder if DSP load could be reduced ... or a 4 X 4, 6 X 6 made.
Ah, also a Freq multiplier mod
I'm with shroomz and the others.
I would add the following:
A buffer
A small oscilloscope
A "scale module" wich quantizes the pitch of the input according to a selected scale (ex CMaj, D pentatonic, chromatic etc...).
A "scale table module" which can be attached to the previous one and where the user can adjust his own scale.
Some smaller info modules like the "multipeak 4-6-8": you have in a single module 4 or 6 or 8 peak meter saving a lot of workspace.
Hmm... I have to think now...
I would add the following:
A buffer
A small oscilloscope
A "scale module" wich quantizes the pitch of the input according to a selected scale (ex CMaj, D pentatonic, chromatic etc...).
A "scale table module" which can be attached to the previous one and where the user can adjust his own scale.
Some smaller info modules like the "multipeak 4-6-8": you have in a single module 4 or 6 or 8 peak meter saving a lot of workspace.
Hmm... I have to think now...
Hey Guys, there are alot of suggestions so ill try to be brief as possible:
u got it!
when we will not have dsp limits, then modules of this sort will be very welcome, and even better dynamic modules (you can select how many envelopes you want...)
ok this is getting too long. ill post continue in another one...
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: ReD_MuZe on 2006-09-02 04:01 ]</font>
u got itselfoscillating filter alternatives
I know that the system has phase problems, and stereo modules would be welcome. unfortunetaly, dsp limits will not allow enough poliphony for the modules, another problem is that with a stereo module you can do much less than with 2 mono ones. im sorry but for now it is off the tableTrue stereo versions of every module
well i will be adding a midi desplay for you to see the midi stream of the controller of your choice this will save alot of space. adding texts to the modules will just make them bigger.I'm a bit dissapointed that so many of the stock CW modules don't have text entries for all of their parameters.
there are already two types of knobs. it doesnt matter how big it is if your using circular motion then you get the resolution of your screen (more resolution as far you are from the knob)Another point worth a mention is pot/knob size for parameters such as course tuning of an OSC.
u got it!VC mixers like Doepfer A-135
Voltage Controlled Switch?" Multiple " module a little like the 1x8 switch but without the switch option and one model with bipolar outputs, one with sweeping option ( well it's a little the A-152 )
u got it!
in analog you dont need to worry about dsp limitations. however this is digital domain and we could all use as much dsp as possible without leaving any unused modules to ocupy it.Something like the A -143-1.....Merging the diode, half inverter and such into one " multimaxiverter " module with or without the switch option ( multiple outs at once )
Well merging old CWA into compact multi-uses modules in the spirit of hardware like dual ringmod and such to gain GUI space.
when we will not have dsp limits, then modules of this sort will be very welcome, and even better dynamic modules (you can select how many envelopes you want...)
whats that?A Track & Hold
we try our bestSquishing as most as possible modules like Val Freeze, GUI space again
you got it!Fade mod for granular sequencer
just for the step indicator?Gfx on / off for Hyper note sequencer ( despite there's not too much space left )
you have phase mod which is actualy a modulatable delay. the sample delay crackles when modlatedSample delay mod.
again we have an issue of limited dsp at the moment. clavias system is not as modular as scope, and modularity requires more dsp...Another issue I have with the modular is having no multi OSCs which have multiple waveform outs like you find on almost every old & new modular system including Clavia's.
ok this is getting too long. ill post continue in another one...
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: ReD_MuZe on 2006-09-02 04:01 ]</font>
everything here is possible with modular3 modules and flexorI'am in lack of bipolarity ... would like pitch bipolar modifiers and mixers + something like that : http://www.ear-group.net/model_14.html quite a smart multi-purpose module, also model 17
will have to research that.NRPN to CV module.
pysical modeling is pattented. but comb filters are not you will have several tools for that.Some physical modelling OSCs. IE:- Plucked, bowed & hammered string, brass, bell, reed etc. You know, kinda like the prophecy & yamaha VL.
im not 100% sure what you mean.Also a bi-phase and tri-phase ( sine ) LFO with modulation on phase and on non - integer ratios and outputs for 1+2 1+3 2+3 1+2+3 and 1*2 1*3 2*3 1*2*3
you got it!j9k made a quite handy 8 X 8 mixer matrix with bipolar knobs but it eats some DSP, I wonder if DSP load could be reduced ... or a 4 X 4, 6 X 6 made.
whats that?Ah, also a Freq multiplier mod
thats a delayA buffer
sorry its impossible for me atm.A small oscilloscope
ill have to research on that a bitA "scale module" wich quantizes the pitch of the input according to a selected scale
you got it!Some smaller info modules like the "multipeak 4-6-8": you have in a single module 4 or 6 or 8 peak meter saving a lot of workspace.
guys keep em coming! there were some very good suggestions here!
I understand the will for combined modules.
it saves up space, and is easier to control...
the problem is, i cannot make a multimode oscilator without taking more DSP. and if your not using all of the shapes it would be a waste.
flexor has a problem that each module has to fit 1 dsp.
so it is actualy "waisting" more unused dsp anhow.
so for the time being combined modules are off the table.
sorry
i can however say, that flexor2's new moules will offer yet another whole new range of sound possibilities. brace yourself!
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: ReD_MuZe on 2006-09-02 04:31 ]</font>
it saves up space, and is easier to control...
the problem is, i cannot make a multimode oscilator without taking more DSP. and if your not using all of the shapes it would be a waste.
flexor has a problem that each module has to fit 1 dsp.
so it is actualy "waisting" more unused dsp anhow.
so for the time being combined modules are off the table.
sorry
i can however say, that flexor2's new moules will offer yet another whole new range of sound possibilities. brace yourself!
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: ReD_MuZe on 2006-09-02 04:31 ]</font>
New sampler-modules would be great, if they use fewer DSPs the modular-sample-modules use way too much DSP. The first simple sampleplayer was so fantastic light on DSP... something like this for modular would open the possibilities to build new customized samplers.
... I'm not too optimistic with that... should be very difficult somehow to build such a module...
hm... I just have an idea... oh, maybe I can do something too ;o)...
Martin
... I'm not too optimistic with that... should be very difficult somehow to build such a module...
hm... I just have an idea... oh, maybe I can do something too ;o)...
Martin