PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com

<a name="planetz-file"></a><a href="http://www.machine-records.com/cat/monostril.mp3"><img src="/forums/images/listen_icon.gif" border="0" alt=" Song"> Song</a><BR> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Genre: IDM<BR> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Uses: Pulsar Synths<BR> copyright © 2005 Toby Newman<BR> _____________________________________<BR><BR> Here is my latest release on the machine.records record label, as promotion for a forthcoming album. I use Scope extensively throughout, naturally.

Here follows the label's blurb:

ODDSKOOL | 'Monostril'
DMR05/010
Released: 05.12.05
Format: MP3



‘Monostril’, the tenth download single from the award-winning electronica label machine.records, is a new track from ODDSKOOL.

Featured on last year’s machine.music 2 compilation, ODDSKOOL (aka Toby Newman) has been locked in the studio since then working on a full-length album release, emerging only to perform a few unforgettable live sets at our TERMINAL night (most recently on October 20th at Cardiff’s legendary Clwb Ifor Bach).

This track is the first we have managed to coax from Toby for public release since then, and it’s more than worth the wait. As with his ‘Diet Hogan’ track, which caught the attention of the late John Peel, the intricate yet expansive sound of ‘Monostril’ results in a totally unique kind of IDM.

‘Monostril’ is available as a free download from December 5th 2005. A full-length ODDSKOOL studio album will be released in 2006.

Hi Toby,
Incredible and funny track!
I like it very much in particular the sound!

How have you done the "reverse effect" at about 1:15 and about 2:10?

Nice work!

Hi Lima - thanks for the comments.

I'm not sure which sound you mean - can you be more accurate with the times?

Do you mean the sound at 2:13 and 2:22 perhaps?

I mean the global sound, "how the track sounds".

About the times, I was referring to the parts that seems to be played backwards (like you was scretching backwards the disc). They starts at minute 1:08 and at 2:21.

I think I know the part you mean now - although I think you are hearing two different techniques there and thinking that they are the same.

The first is done by internally sampling the mix, loading the sample on to the STS-5000, and extreme-pitch-bending the result.

The second one is my very own extra special technique that I am afraid I am disinclined to share

incredibly nice tune! im totally into the simplistic feeling this track gives me.

if i could go to a concert with you and stephen hummel i would be VERY enthustiastic.

Well I understand you

Thanks anyway!

nice atmosphere, and a lot of tech fun tricks

Just to follow up on this one with some good news...

The record label 'Machine.Records' have just released my album, which features this track.
The full details are in this thread:
http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... &0&start=0

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: asktoby on 2006-08-05 08:04 ]</font>

Cool:)
Makes me think of Oldfield, there's a bit of the same ... purity? ... as in his Taurus 1,2 and I'm not sure how many Taurus's he did.
yeah ... I am weird - I know
congratz on the record deal

This is very intelligent music, thanks for sharing it!!

Bizarre: I've not heard Oldfield's 'Taurus' before. I'll look into getting hold of it so I can compare.

Thanks, Shroomz, I like to make my music such that it is enjoyable even without paying much attention but, if you do sit down and listen carefully, there is enough going on to maintain your attention and interest. Hopefully the line between 'intelligent' and 'enjoyable from a relaxed perspective' is drawn accurately!

nice one! i like the "old games sound" at the end of the track

like it.