Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 4:45 pm
Just added a second Pulsar II to an existing Pulsar II with 2 STDM cables. Works fine (after a bit of hair pulling and getting them both to fit in the case) but...
With just one Pulsar II (6 DSPs), a trivial project with one wave source and one ADAT destination takes roughly 6% on 5 of the DSPs and maybe 10% on the 6th. With 2 Pulsar IIs (12 DSPs), 9 of them start off at 20-25% with the same trivial project.
I know there's some overhead involved in managing the STDM bus, but this means that (roughly) doubling the number of DSP chips has actually only achived a 30% increase in DSP power.
Not that it's a problem for what I'm doing, but it doesn't seem quite right...
With just one Pulsar II (6 DSPs), a trivial project with one wave source and one ADAT destination takes roughly 6% on 5 of the DSPs and maybe 10% on the 6th. With 2 Pulsar IIs (12 DSPs), 9 of them start off at 20-25% with the same trivial project.
I know there's some overhead involved in managing the STDM bus, but this means that (roughly) doubling the number of DSP chips has actually only achived a 30% increase in DSP power.
Not that it's a problem for what I'm doing, but it doesn't seem quite right...