Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 7:08 am
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: AndreD on 2005-02-27 08:01 ]</font>
PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com
Scope Users Community
https://www.forums.scopeusers.com/
Ambience High Quality Reverb
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 8:00 am
..and somehow "ot"..
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: AndreD on 2005-02-27 08:01 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: AndreD on 2005-02-27 08:01 ]</font>
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:08 pm
I've used it and it's pretty good (and free!). Don't know how it would hold up against Warp69's P100/A100 reverbs though...
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 7:09 pm
serious ??? you're kidding
ok, it doesn't cost much - but is it supposed to synthesize new hi-hats into drumloops ?
it doesn't transfer the room's character to the signal, but it's own sh*tty noiseprint - those rooms simply do not exist (but it's not spacey either...)
definetely 2 classes below Warp69's Ambient - now I begin to understand why that Princeton emu got such enthusiastic reviews.
cheers, Tom
ok, it doesn't cost much - but is it supposed to synthesize new hi-hats into drumloops ?
it doesn't transfer the room's character to the signal, but it's own sh*tty noiseprint - those rooms simply do not exist (but it's not spacey either...)
definetely 2 classes below Warp69's Ambient - now I begin to understand why that Princeton emu got such enthusiastic reviews.
cheers, Tom
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:18 am
btw. it's old too.
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:36 am
off
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: pwabixcpp on 2005-03-05 09:20 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: pwabixcpp on 2005-03-05 09:20 ]</font>
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:10 am
the algorithm is crap - it completely blurs the highs.
And the thing got a kind of shoebox-material soundprint, it severely cuts the spectrum of the input - sparing lots of CPU cycles probably
Btw it produced a close to 20% load on my P4/2.4, not too smart imho...
This doesn't mean that it sounds bad or isn't useful in a mix.
It just means that it's not a faithful 'ambience'-producer.
(All of) Warp69's devices are incredibly precise in this context of preserving the characteristics of the original signal.
cheers, Tom
And the thing got a kind of shoebox-material soundprint, it severely cuts the spectrum of the input - sparing lots of CPU cycles probably
Btw it produced a close to 20% load on my P4/2.4, not too smart imho...
This doesn't mean that it sounds bad or isn't useful in a mix.
It just means that it's not a faithful 'ambience'-producer.
(All of) Warp69's devices are incredibly precise in this context of preserving the characteristics of the original signal.
cheers, Tom
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:09 pm
true.
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:15 pm
Isnt that the same verb thats been repackaged and bundled with SX3 and Nuendo3?
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:38 pm
yes.
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 6:28 am
i trust deneb's opinion as he always has a completely balanced opinion on things and has superior ears (cos he's told us so).
Mr A
Mr A
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 8:50 am
........... ' I really have superior ears 'Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:55 am
This is good:
http://www.knufinke.de/sir/index_en.html
for impulses:
http://noisevault.com/index.php
...
http://www.knufinke.de/sir/index_en.html
for impulses:
http://noisevault.com/index.php
...