Page 1 of 1
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:53 pm
by BingoTheClowno
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 4:18 pm
by hubird
Graphicer Maurits Escher (+ '72) could have done nice prints with these remarkable outlined creatures
The troubled water makes the picture more abstract already.
nice pics
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 4:35 pm
by BingoTheClowno
Maurits:
Brilliant!
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: BingoTheClowno on 2005-01-19 16:36 ]</font>
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 4:42 pm
by BingoTheClowno
On 2005-01-19 16:18, hubird wrote:
Graphicer Maurits Escher (+ '72) could have done nice prints with these remarkable outlined creatures
The troubled water makes the picture more abstract already.
nice pics
Maybe he already did...
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 4:56 pm
by hubird
Bingo, that picture I had in mind I guess
Escher was Dutch, prob he only knew 'simple' gooses and roaches (?)
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: hubird on 2005-01-19 17:03 ]</font>
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 6:51 pm
by Immanuel
Yeah, just cut your finger, if you want a little bit of attention.
Escher is one of my all time favorites. What a mind, and still so expressive. Imagine being able to do the same with music!!
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 9:47 pm
by hubird
morphing in surround?
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:20 pm
by Immanuel
Yes, I thought of that, and sure there exists a lot of nice transitions in music. Still it often feels like something else to me. Maybe because sound moves a timeline, and no 2 times exists at the same time without being something different. Whereas a painting exists (IMO) both as a whole and as a timeline if you let your attention shift between different areas/objects. But then, you can make attention shifts with music too. I don't know. Escher seemed to be able to bend physical laws in some of his works, while musicians for good reasons can not play backwards in real time.
